No, I switched to v.high. It's not making the performance any worse than it was at high.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Crysis 3 PC Performance Thread
- Thread starter Sethos
- Start date
ScepticMatt
Member
not possible to run maxed out ≠ unoptimized.FACE said:
Haunted
Member
Ahead of its time.
No wonder Yerli was talking it up in comparison to games targeting next generation hardware. It seems to be one of them.
edit: I want to link of the thread trying to prepare people that the next year will require people to upgrade their PCs to stay ahead in game performance. Looks like Crytek is (again) leading the charge.
No wonder Yerli was talking it up in comparison to games targeting next generation hardware. It seems to be one of them.
edit: I want to link of the thread trying to prepare people that the next year will require people to upgrade their PCs to stay ahead in game performance. Looks like Crytek is (again) leading the charge.
ShellyDeKiller
Member
Anyone with an HD 7970 here? All I see is nvidia -_-
I'm gonna get this game for free with my future 7970, so I wanted to see how it performs on it.
I'm gonna get this game for free with my future 7970, so I wanted to see how it performs on it.
Thanks!
I suppose once the next gen consoles release we'll notice more games like this, where current high end cards can no longer maintain the 1080p/60FPS target.
Roughly this with the beta 4 drivers, can't find anything for beta 5 which is even faster again.
Oh, very good news then. A single GTX670 maxing out Crysis 3 with SMAA/FXAA ?
I like that.
Can Crusher
Banned
Guess I can run it at 720p (no msaa) in high quality on my hd6850. Not bad.
keltickennedy
Member
Is there an option to turn off AO. Usually when games are dipping lower than I would like that is the first thing I turn down or completely off to get a huge boost in performance.
Glad I didn't get this right away. Will wait a bit till it gets optimized a bit.
Glad I didn't get this right away. Will wait a bit till it gets optimized a bit.
As long as you are okay with it being locked 30fps for the most!
Default SSAO is really cheap in CryEngine 3.
Moff
Member
this is what the games looks like on my i7-3820, 16GB RAM with a GTX680
top is medium settings with 1xAA, mostly 60fps with lots of dips to 30-40
not 100% sure on what setting I'll finish the game
top is medium settings with 1xAA, mostly 60fps with lots of dips to 30-40
bottom is very high settings (maximum) with 4xAA, mostly locked to 30 fps, occasional dips to 40 and 20
not 100% sure on what setting I'll finish the game
I don't understand. How can the GTX 590 out perform the GTX 680? Shouldn't it be the other way around? Do you have any insight on this, my friend?
Running with everything on high except for Textures and Objects which are on Very High, I also have SMAA on medium (2xTX) and the game is at a resolution of 1920x1080.
Getting a constant 30FPS on my laptop - 680m and i7-3630QM.
For anyone saying that Crytek can't optimise for shit - this is the best looking game I have ever seen. It's breathtaking visually. First mission isn't a great measure of this but as soon as you get to the more open and natural enviroments... HOLY HECK.
Crytek promised a game that would cripple GPUs due to how advanced it was and they delivered.
Getting a constant 30FPS on my laptop - 680m and i7-3630QM.
For anyone saying that Crytek can't optimise for shit - this is the best looking game I have ever seen. It's breathtaking visually. First mission isn't a great measure of this but as soon as you get to the more open and natural enviroments... HOLY HECK.
Crytek promised a game that would cripple GPUs due to how advanced it was and they delivered.
Because it's still a beast. It's essentially 2 580s on one PCB but at a slightly lower clock speed.
Beats it in almost everything http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/516?vs=555
Sweet. Has anyone tried it on the full version? (Not sure if it would even work, given it was for the Beta MP).
I have a GTX 680 2b SLI setup, and with EVERYTHING maxed out (4 TXA) the game runs like ass. 25-30 fps, with dips. I turned my TXA down to medium, and it didn't really change the FPS.
So I eventually switched to the lowest MSA setting - and now it runs 45-55 FPS. Much much better. Game is actually fluid again. I should also note, I'm playing at 2560x1600p. And TBH, I can't even tell the difference from going to TXA to MSAA. Still looks gorgeous. Also for those wondering, with EVERYTHING maxed out, I wasn't going over 2gb of memory. Even in heavy intensive/wide open areas. But I'm not that far into the game yet.
7970 here. Getting really bad performance tho. 13.12 Beta 5 drivers. Game seems to lock itself at 30fps during most of the 1st stage- occasionally jumping into the 50s
The GTX 590 has been the best GPU available for almost the last year, and the highest end GPU available for the year before that.
It's two underclocked 580's on one board.
I have one and it's been great, won't be looking to upgrade for at least another year. Next time I'll just go with a real SLI setup, though. the X90 series GPUs are pretty finicky. You can imagine the troubles that arise with two GPUs on one board. Especially the heat. Runs games like a beast, though.
Someone make a douchebag steve with the following: Has two GTX 690s -> Takes compressed screenshots.
MikeE21286
Member
So, is this the game which finally makes me upgrade my trusty GTX570?
I have the same card. I am very interested in the perfor---
oh boy
I don't know what hoodoo Crytek do but I played Crysis 1 at an average of around 25-30 fps because I refused to turn stuff off and it actually felt playable still, even on a mouse.
Saying that I may play this with a controller to negate that 30fps feeling you get with a mouse.
BloodMoney
Banned
The rain in those Guru3D captures looks insane.
Reminds me of the first level of MGS2.
Reminds me of the first level of MGS2.
Pretty sure you would need to 690s two even think about it until some better drivers/patches come out for performance.Guess I'll have to forget downsampling with my GTX570.
BloodMoney
Banned
Makes me appreciate my 720p projector
I don't anticipate performance problems at that red with my 670.
Same here, i've got an Eizo monitorsthat does 1:1 hardware scaling. If i am hurting for frames with my 670 PE i simple drop down to 1680x1050. The displayed image is smaller (black border around the perimeter) but the reduction in pixel rendering significantly improves performance.
1920x1200 = 2,304,000 pixels
1680x1050 = 1,764,000 pixels
appoximately 26% less pixels
IIRC yes.
dont see why not, C2 did, 1's supported it, but it wasnt great.
Snkfanatic
Banned
My 660ti is crying right now haha.
Haunted
Member
I'm impressed.
BloodMoney
Banned
The lighting effects look amazing.
ebullientprism
Member
Jesus Christ those faces. I mean holy shit that is insanely good.
Aye
Why does there seem to be a lack of good AA in some shots. I would think spending that much money would give you the ability to eliminate aliasing in all games.
Guess not.
Yeah, they actually have 'low' and 'medium' now. Very High is max. Judging by comparison screens there doesn't seem to be a huge difference between the higher settings but regardless, the game is a stunner.
I think it looks even better in motion than the screens give it justice. The first time I got to the section with the close-ups posted above, my jaw dropped.
EatChildren
Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Remember kids:
cl_fov 80 (or your chosen variable) changes the main field of view
r_drawnearfov 80 (or your chosen variable) changes the view model (first person gun) field of view
cl_fov 80 (or your chosen variable) changes the main field of view
r_drawnearfov 80 (or your chosen variable) changes the view model (first person gun) field of view
The beta came with a FOV slider, I assume the final game will too.
Similar threads
- Locked