• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF
  • Like

Bonen no Max'd
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:53 AM)
Bonen no Max'd's Avatar

Originally Posted by whyamihere

This year, 1.

Next year, New Mexico, Nevada, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Illinois, Colorado (I believe)

The breaking a bunch of R trifectas. There are some reach state houses like FL Senate, AZ Senate, MN Houss (I believe?), and then something in Michigan I believe they may go for. Not sure though.

Minnesota House would require flipping 11 (out of 134) seats, which seems doable if the numbers from specials this year are holding up.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 04:55 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by whyamihere

This year, 1.

Next year, New Mexico, Nevada, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Illinois, Colorado (I believe)

The breaking a bunch of R trifectas. There are some reach state houses like FL Senate, AZ Senate, MN Houss (I believe?), and then something in Michigan I believe they may go for. Not sure though.

There's actually two this year - winning New Jersey governor would flip that state to a trifecta, but there's also a heavily D, R-held State Senate special election in Washington state which would flip the chamber. Democrats have a nominal majority, but one turncoat Democrat (Tim Sheldon) is caucusing with the Republicans.

MN House is always in play, MI House is being targeted but it's gerrymandered as fuck. Not as far out of reach as the State Senate though, I believe.

Colorado and Maine are both one seat away from their State Senates flipping, and Maine needs the governorship. New Hampshire would require a total flip but is also an extremely volatile state, so that's not off the table. The other states you mentioned all just need the governor's race to flip our way, in addition to Maryland.

Originally Posted by Bonen no Max'd

Minnesota House would require flipping 11 (out of 134) seats, which seems doable if the numbers from specials this year are holding up.

Totally in play. We won the House majority in 2012.

The State Senate is aggravatingly 34-33 R/D. Had Terri Bonoff not left her seat open to run for Congress we probably would have held it and thus the majority, but that's hindsight for you. It's not up again until 2020.
BoboBrazil
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:55 AM)
BoboBrazil's Avatar
Trump doing a rally tomorrow in Missouri. Time to go off the rails again.
whyamihere
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:56 AM)
whyamihere's Avatar
Winnable (I'm not saying Dems have over a 50% chance of winning, I'm just saying these are theoretically winnable):

VA Gov (2017)
NJ Gov (2017)
WA Senate (2017)

ME Gov (2018)
NH Gov (2018)
MI Gov (2018)
OH Gov (2018)
FL Gov (2018)
GA Gov (2018)
KS Gov (2018)
NM Gov (2018)
NV Gov (2018)
VT Gov (2018)
IL Gov (2018)
IA Gov (2018)
MA Gov (2018)
WI Gov (2018)
MD Gov (2018)

CO Senate (2018)
ME Senate (2018)
FL Senate (2018)
AZ Senate (2018)
NH Senate (2018)
IA Senate (2018)
WI Senate (2018)

MN House (2018)
AZ House (2018)
MI House (2018)
NH House (2018)

VA Senate (2019)

Again, these are just vague targets, not that Democrats have over a 50% chance of winning any of these seats/houses. Don't reply with "lol Dems will never will KS Gov you idiot"

Originally Posted by Bonen no Max'd

Minnesota House would require flipping 11 (out of 134) seats, which seems doable if the numbers from specials this year are holding up.

Yeah unfortunately the MN Senate isn't up until 2020.
Last edited by whyamihere; 08-30-2017 at 04:58 AM.
Ithil
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:57 AM)
Ithil's Avatar

Originally Posted by BoboBrazil

Trump doing a rally tomorrow in Missouri. Time to go off the rails again.

He's doing a rally in Missouri while Texas is drowning?
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 04:58 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar
FL Senate is probably more winnable in 2020 due to how the terms are staggered out, though a wave could give it to us next year. We'll have to wait and see.
BoboBrazil
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:58 AM)
BoboBrazil's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ithil

He's doing a rally in Missouri while Texas is drowning?

Yep, for "tax reform"
whyamihere
Member
(08-30-2017, 04:59 AM)
whyamihere's Avatar

Originally Posted by Aaron Strife

FL Senate is probably more winnable in 2020 due to how the terms are staggered out, though a wave could give it to us next year. We'll have to wait and see.

Yeah, a lot of these require waves.
The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
(08-30-2017, 05:02 AM)
The Technomancer's Avatar
How bad is the actual property damage likely to be from Harvey? It doesn't look...structural? I don't know a ton about how flood recovery looks
sc0la
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:06 AM)
sc0la's Avatar

Originally Posted by The Technomancer

How bad is the actual property damage likely to be from Harvey? It doesn't look...structural? I don't know a ton about how flood recovery looks

Even if damage is not technically structural the water damage and mold will destroy basically everything.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 05:11 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by whyamihere

Yeah, a lot of these require waves.

8-point generic ballot win in Michigan in 2012 put them five seats away from a majority - maybe a double-digit win could do the job.

Candidate recruitment is going to be a huge factor, Democrats have whiffed on several winnable races because they can't find anyone to run. Hopefully what we saw with the Virginia House of Delegates this year (at least one Dem candidate in 88 out of 100 districts, versus just 56/100 in 2015) translates to other states next year.

To put those Virginia numbers in context: 54 of the 66 Republicans are facing challengers in the general election. Just 6 of the 34 Democrats are facing a Republican.
Last edited by Aaron Strife; 08-30-2017 at 05:14 AM.
VendettaRed07
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:12 AM)
VendettaRed07's Avatar
I'll also bring up for the millionth time that Dems are at risk of losing one of the only trifectas we have in 2018

Think all the others will be a hold but I'm not confident in that being maintained
Ithil
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:15 AM)
Ithil's Avatar

Originally Posted by BoboBrazil

Yep, for "tax reform"

Which he knows absolutely nothing about.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 05:18 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by VendettaRed07

I'll also bring up for the millionth time that Dems are at risk of losing one of the only trifectas we have in 2018

Think all the others will be a hold but I'm not confident in that being maintained

Connecticut? At least Malloy won't be running again.
Pixieking
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:19 AM)
Pixieking's Avatar
This would be worthy of a thread, except it's almost-bait, and would descend into hell within the first 6 replies.

In one corner of the Internet, the 2016 Democratic primary never ended

On Friday afternoon, a judge in South Florida dismissed a lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, brought by people who accused it of committing fraud during the 2016 primary to the detriment of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt). Neither the DNC nor ousted chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) responded to the dismissal when asked to comment.

Within hours, the attorneys who bought the suit, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, were providing updates on the case to the blogger and fantasy author H.A. Goodman. Calling out the people and outlets who they believe had covered them unfairly, the Becks described a legal system so corrupt that there could be no fair accounting for what the DNC did. It would be up to alternative media to get the truth out.

That's eerily close to the whole Fox News/Breitbart "pushing a narrative because the MSM" are so corrupt" thing.

In the months between the April hearing and the August dismissal, the #DNCFraudsuit Web speculated about the deaths of the process server who had handed papers to the DNC, of attorney Beranton Whisenant, of a Haitian official who was set to testify in a corruption case, and of the former DNC IT staffer Seth Rich.

“The DNC fraud lawsuit continues to be ignored by the mainstream media; meanwhile, the Clinton body count continues to grow,” said Infowars’ Owen Shroyer last month, before asking Elizabeth Beck whether the deaths were related to the fraud case.

The Infowars interview was one of several intersections between the DNC case obsessives and right-wing media.

It's interesting, especially as it's the WaPo covering something from the "dark corners of the internet", so to speak, and is therefore akin to when the mainstream media starting paying attention to GG - shining a light on the irrational, and all that.
Oblivion
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(08-30-2017, 05:19 AM)
Oblivion's Avatar
How many states allow the legislature to redraw maps without the governor's approval?

We don't have to flip every branch of state government. We absolutely have to get governorship and at least peel off enough Republican seats in the legislatures, even if Republicans still ultimately control them, as long as we deprive their ability to have veto-proof majorities.
VendettaRed07
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:22 AM)
VendettaRed07's Avatar

Originally Posted by Aaron Strife

Connecticut? At least Malloy won't be running again.

Yeap.

I'm worried that it won't make a difference sort of like Christie not running again won't help whatever republican runs.

I want Dan Drew to win because he's the most different of any of the candidates running but I doubt he wins a primary
Box of Kittens
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:24 AM)
Box of Kittens's Avatar

Originally Posted by Oblivion

How many states allow the legislature to redraw maps without the governor's approval?

We don't have to flip every branch of state government. We absolutely have to get governorship and at least peel off enough Republican seats in the legislatures, even if Republicans still ultimately control them, as long as we deprive their ability to have veto-proof majorities.

This page is somewhat useful but then you get into nuances like in Indiana where, yeah, the governor can technically veto the maps, but what's the point when the legislature can override with a simple majority?
NeoXChaos
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:26 AM)
NeoXChaos's Avatar

Originally Posted by Oblivion

How many states allow the legislature to redraw maps without the governor's approval?

We don't have to flip every branch of state government. We absolutely have to get governorship and at least peel off enough Republican seats in the legislatures, even if Republicans still ultimately control them, as long as we deprive their ability to have veto-proof majorities.

https://ballotpedia.org/State-by-sta...ing_procedures

This is some good information on that process. I would assume it depends on if the veto by the Governor can be overturned with a simple or 2/3rd majority. According to Box Kittens in Indiana it's just a simple majority. Approval is really just the matter of signing it or vetoing it.
Oblivion
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(08-30-2017, 05:29 AM)
Oblivion's Avatar

Originally Posted by Box of Kittens

This page is somewhat useful but then you get into nuances like in Indiana where, yeah, the governor can technically veto the maps, but what's the point when the legislature can override with a simple majority?

Originally Posted by NeoXChaos

https://ballotpedia.org/State-by-sta...ing_procedures

This is some good information on that process. I would assume it depends on if the veto by the Governor can be overturned with a simple or 2/3rd majority. According to Box Kittens in Indiana it's just a simple majority. Approval is really just the matter of signing it or vetoing it.

Thanks, that's helpful.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 05:30 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by Oblivion

How many states allow the legislature to redraw maps without the governor's approval?

We don't have to flip every branch of state government. We absolutely have to get governorship and at least peel off enough Republican seats in the legislatures, even if Republicans still ultimately control them, as long as we deprive their ability to have veto-proof majorities.

No veto power over maps in Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, Mississippi or North Carolina.

Arizona, Indiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia allow legislators to override a veto with simple majority votes. Alabama and Kentucky also allow this, but only in a special session called on by the governor, making their veto power absolute. In regards to redistricting though, Arizona has a nonpartisan commission that draws the maps (hence you have a Congressional map that tends to split 5-4 either way rather than being heavily gerrymandered for the GOP).

Also, Connecticut and Maine require a 2/3rds majority on maps passed out of the legislature, making it pretty difficult to gerrymander either state.
Box of Kittens
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:34 AM)
Box of Kittens's Avatar
Unfortunately I don't know of a good page with a summary of gubernatorial veto powers, perhaps in part because it can get really complicated with line item vetoes and such. Wisconsin, for example, gives the governor ridiculous veto powers, though they have been somewhat curtailed over time to eliminate tricks known by names like the Vanna White Veto and the Frankenstein Veto.

This page does briefly summarize veto powers in the Midwest at least, but if anyone has a link to a source which gives a decent summary for every state, I would love to see it.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 05:39 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar
If we win all the trifectas that whyamihere listed off, the only Clinton states that wouldn't have D trifectas would be Virginia and Minnesota, both one seat shy in the State Senate.

A problem which could be easily remedied come 2019 and 2020, respectively!
The Chosen One
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:46 AM)
The Chosen One's Avatar

Originally Posted by Wilsongt

At least you have a tag, lol

Seriously. I've been here since 2005 and I still don't have a tag.

We'll probably see Trump's taxes before I get a tag.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 05:51 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar
I don't even know when or why I got this tag. I think it was after something I posted in Gaming in like 2008.
Teggy
Member
(08-30-2017, 05:55 AM)
Teggy's Avatar

Originally Posted by Aaron Strife

I don't even know when or why I got this tag. I think it was after something I posted in Gaming in like 2008.

It's a pretty cool tag, given how many are designed to just embarrass people.
The Technomancer
card-carrying scientician
(08-30-2017, 05:55 AM)
The Technomancer's Avatar
Man I used to post so much more about science
Oblivion
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(08-30-2017, 05:58 AM)
Oblivion's Avatar
I didn't mind my older tag: "Runs better on PC than 360" (R.I.P. Hitokage)

Of course, this gave the impression that I liked that game, when I never played it. The word "Oblivion" existed before Bethesda used it, people!
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 06:01 AM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by Teggy

It's a pretty cool tag, given how many are designed to just embarrass people.

Yeah. It just makes me want to immortalize the Skeeter avatar though. Sometimes you gotta change it up, you know?
The Chosen One
Member
(08-30-2017, 06:02 AM)
The Chosen One's Avatar
Just looking at the Gallup Daily Tracker...

Trump's approval rating has almost literally been unchanged for the last 7 days. That's pretty unusual for the daily tracker. Definitely feels like we've hit a new threshold. I think the new variance will be between 32-37% where had been 35-39%.

It wasn't obvious immediately, but Charlottesville has definitely taken its toll on Trump, particularly among moderate-leaning Republicans.
UberTag
Member
(08-30-2017, 06:08 AM)
UberTag's Avatar

Originally Posted by The Chosen One

Just looking at the Gallup Daily Tracker...

Trump's approval rating has almost literally been unchanged for the last 7 days. That's pretty unusual for the daily tracker. Definitely feels like we've hit a new threshold. I think the new variance will be between 32-37% where had been 35-39%.

It wasn't obvious immediately, but Charlottesville has definitely taken its toll on Trump, particularly among moderate-leaning Republicans.

They enjoyed being able to play the denial card that he was a white supremacist.
Now they can't. Boo-urns.
aspiegamer
Member
(08-30-2017, 06:52 AM)
aspiegamer's Avatar

Originally Posted by The Technomancer

How bad is the actual property damage likely to be from Harvey? It doesn't look...structural? I don't know a ton about how flood recovery looks

This progressively seems likely to be worse than Katrina in terms of property damage, and perhaps just as many (or more) displaced persons. One ballpark estimate I saw was 300,000 homes in the broader Houston area impacted in some way from the water, but that's a number difficult to believe. That'd be about a million displaced persons. In terms of "people who have had to deal with the impacts in some way," six million people live in areas that have received at least 30" of rain in the pat 5 days.

Total death toll could be.... bad. Basically, anything under Katrina totals (1200 in NOLA) can be credited to the massive crowdsourcing water rescue effort that social media helped organize and execute, which is not a thing we had 12 years ago.
BoboBrazil
Member
(08-30-2017, 07:29 AM)
BoboBrazil's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ithil

Which he knows absolutely nothing about.

Neither does Congress:P He's definitely going to say something stupid though, so should be fun.
Strike
Member
(08-30-2017, 08:49 AM)
Strike's Avatar

Originally Posted by Pixieking

This would be worthy of a thread, except it's almost-bait, and would descend into hell within the first 6 replies.

In one corner of the Internet, the 2016 Democratic primary never ended



That's eerily close to the whole Fox News/Breitbart "pushing a narrative because the MSM" are so corrupt" thing.



It's interesting, especially as it's the WaPo covering something from the "dark corners of the internet", so to speak, and is therefore akin to when the mainstream media starting paying attention to GG - shining a light on the irrational, and all that.

I got a friend who seems to be all about this on facebook. She really went off the deep end after the primaries. RT got her fucked up.
Spoiled Milk
Member
(08-30-2017, 08:51 AM)
Spoiled Milk's Avatar


I've been busy with legal stuff but somehow I'm still the number one source of memes in PoliGAF.
Blader
Member
(08-30-2017, 12:47 PM)
Blader's Avatar

Originally Posted by Strike

I got a friend who seems to be all about this on facebook. She really went off the deep end after the primaries. RT got her fucked up.

It's much easier, and probably more interesting, to chase fantasies and believe you're the only one who can get to the truth than do anything real or constructive.
ArkhamFantasy
Member
(08-30-2017, 01:46 PM)
ArkhamFantasy's Avatar
How long does it usually take for disaster relief to go up for a vote?
dramatis
Member
(08-30-2017, 01:48 PM)
dramatis's Avatar
Paging pigeon

Thinking Of Running For Office? A Website Lets You Test The Waters

Bateson was sitting in the bleachers, her blood boiling. In 2008, McClintock won office by a tiny margin. But he's been winning with landslides ever since. She has a theory about why: The Democrats who've tried to unseat him didn't raise enough money. She looked into the records and saw that candidates raised only about $9,700 to $105,000. That's chump change.

While issues and party affiliation matter, money also matters. A campaign is like a startup. You need to pump it with cash.

And that is where the Internet begins to factor into this story.

Bateson wanted to find ways to raise money for Democrats in her district. So she Googled terms like "Kickstarter politics." And she got back a site called Crowdpac.com.

Like other sites, Crowdpac (which is nonpartisan), ranks candidates on issues and lets you donate. Unlike others, Crowdpac also lets you explore the idea of running for office, without having to commit.

Around the country, a handful of political newbies are doing what Bateson did — including Republicans, third-party hopefuls and even two other Democrats in her district. The San Francisco-based startup makes money by taking a cut from the donations.

There's a 10-1 ratio of Democrats to Republicans seeking support on Crowdpac. CEO Steve Hilton says, "It seems to me the energy in politics is there," on the progressive side. It could also be a network effect — friends telling friends.

In other respects, the platform is seeing substantial diversity — with disproportionately high use among women candidates, people under 35, and non-lawyers (scientists, doctors and professors).


Originally Posted by ArkhamFantasy

How long does it usually take for disaster relief to go up for a vote?

Congress is still in recess, they get back after the first week of September. I'm not optimistic about disaster relief if they're going to try and tie it to something dumb.
nature boy
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:04 PM)
nature boy's Avatar
Enjoy!

Crab
Famed for his Europa Universalis IV exploits
(08-30-2017, 02:05 PM)
Crab's Avatar
The answer is probably 'do nothing', in which case Trump might actually be okay since 'do nothing' has described his Presidency to date.
kess
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:07 PM)
kess's Avatar
Did the federal governmenr ever accept the Mexican offer for disaster relief?
chadskin
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:07 PM)
chadskin's Avatar

As he heads into an autumn fight on tax reform with a Congress he feels does not respect or fear him, the source close to the president described his mindset, in recent weeks, as “the worst it’s ever been.”

“He feels like this is not what he signed up for, and his accomplishments are being underplayed,” the person added. “He just looks around and says, ‘when is this going to get better.’”

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-house-242159
Wilsongt
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:11 PM)
Wilsongt's Avatar

Originally Posted by nature boy

Enjoy!

Back on NK.

Joy.
Gurgelhals
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:17 PM)
Gurgelhals's Avatar

Originally Posted by chadskin

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-house-242159

Good. At least he's suffering.
BoogieWoogie
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:24 PM)
BoogieWoogie's Avatar

Originally Posted by Spoiled Milk



I've been busy with legal stuff but somehow I'm still the number one source of memes in PoliGAF.

I always find it hilarious that the same people screaming about the government taking their guns are all for a heavily armed police force. Hey idiots, who do you think the government is going to send for your guns?

Originally Posted by chadskin

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-house-242159

Suffer then quit you orange fuck.
Baron von Loathsome
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:24 PM)
Baron von Loathsome's Avatar

Originally Posted by Spoiled Milk

Simple: I can do what I want, you can't.
Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 02:27 PM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by chadskin

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-house-242159

Even Trump hates President Trump.
Ernest
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:28 PM)
Ernest's Avatar

Originally Posted by chadskin

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...e-house-242159

As he heads into an autumn fight on tax reform with a Congress he feels does not respect or fear him, the source close to the president described his mindset, in recent weeks, as “the worst it’s ever been.”

“He feels like this is not what he signed up for, and his accomplishments are being underplayed,” the person added. “He just looks around and says, ‘when is this going to get better.

What a dumb fuck. The first 6 months of a presidency are always the "best", and it only gets tougher and worse from there. Always. Not to mention, he hasn't even had to face any real crisis that needed his direct attention. Even if he doesn't get impeached, he's in for some shit that's gonna rock his world. Unfortunately, it's probably gonna rock our world since he's our goddamned president.
nature boy
Member
(08-30-2017, 02:44 PM)
nature boy's Avatar
More Enjoy!

Aaron Strife
Honk if you love cookies.
(08-30-2017, 02:45 PM)
Aaron Strife's Avatar

Originally Posted by Ernest

What a dumb fuck. The first 6 months of a presidency are always the "best", and it only gets tougher and worse from there. Always. Not to mention, he hasn't even had to face any real crisis that needed his direct attention. Even if he doesn't get impeached, he's in for some shit that's gonna rock his world. Unfortunately, it's probably gonna rock our world since he's our goddamned president.

Yeah even Hurricane Harvey has been handled moreso by the local government thus far.

If he had any self-awareness he might think about the ways in which he's made this harder for himself - his divisive rhetoric, his attempts to make people fear him coming from a place of desperation and insincerity, his complete refusal to educate himself on the legislative process and desire to ram through significant legislation without any bipartisan input or understanding its far-reaching effects. Why did he want to repeal and replace Obamacare again? Oh yeah, to rack up a win.

But no. Everyone just failed him, or worse, deliberately sabotaged him. Entitled brat.

I think guys like him can't process that anyone in the world might have different intentions. Like McCain didn't vote No on skinny repeal because he genuinely didn't like the bill and thought it would hurt people (either people losing their insurance, or the GOP in the long term), I bet Trump thinks he did it so he could steal headlines for a few days.
Last edited by Aaron Strife; 08-30-2017 at 02:48 PM.

Thread Tools