The Strokes
Banned
Can they focus on making a good game first?
*Points at Halo 5*
Can they focus on making a good game first?
ThisThat's what 343i does. Literally their central design mantra is "Change for the sake of change and the sake of being different from Bungie."
See: The entire new garbage art style. And the entire new set of completely uninteresting and unfun enemies.
No. Halo 3 was better.*Points at Halo 5*
This
No. Halo 3 was better.
That was the problem with the storytelling. There was no emotional connection or even just something interesting about him. The problem wasn't that the main character for the whole game wasn't master chief. People had an issue with The Arbiter (I liked him and honestly didn't know this was a thing till way later, much like the Raiden situation in MGS2), and he was miles better as a character than Locke was (honestly I didn't even remember his name until I just read it right now).I'm not quite sure what the point of Locke is, was he just a Poochy? His character feels somewhat like a replacement of the Arbiter although Arby was still in Halo 5. I just don't get him nor did they really double down on the rivalry between him and Chief.
The whole point is that they haven't. Instead of evolving Bungie's stuff, they went to far on making their own version and it has crashed and burned.I agree, but he said 343 hasn't made a good Halo game. Also, 4's campaign was good, suck it Bronx-Man.
Will he finally reveal his face?
Yeah, maybe, though how sad would it be if Nathan Fillion's charisma had to single-handedly carry both Halo and Destiny's identities because the companies in charge of those franchises aren't capable of creating interesting stories, nor characters?Well, it didn't help that Locke was as interesting as cardboard. I still think Buck should have been the leader of Osiris and the one the player takes control of during those missions, instead of just playing a supporting role. Two characters that the fanbase loves pitted against each other - it practically writes itself.
Don't worry, you don't miss anything: they didn't, hence this thread's existence.But heck, this may have been what they attempted in Halo 5, I don't know, I never got an Xbox One.
She's great, but her and chief are better off as simple characters that you go along the ride with and experience a bigger story and adventure. They don't need 50 layers of backstory or depth added just because they haven't developed anyone else.counterpoint: cortana is the best and most interesting character in the halo universe
Yeah, that's true. They kind of painted themselves into a corner with creating the rampancy timeline, so without just a contrived "oh we fixed it" hand wavey explanation they kind of had to do something. I fully expect this to end with curing Cortana and her and Chief walking off into the sunset togetherShe's great, but her and chief are better off as simple characters that you go along the ride with and experience a bigger story and adventure. They don't need 50 layers of backstory or depth added just because they haven't developed anyone else.
For me that's sort of what the first game did and it worked so well. In this series I'd like to experience a story WITH Master Chief and Cortana rather than one that's literally about them and everything in the universe revolves around them somehow
Can they focus on making a good game first?
Only multiplayer. And my post is in good faith. I've no interest in single player FPS, but I'm genuinely curious as to why MC is treated like a gaming cultural icon
We certainly underestimated that with Halo 5.
I ask that question about everything Microsoft puts out.
It wasnt that surprising to me, but the volume of give us more Chief at the end of Halo 5 was significant and so I think if anything hes slightly more important now than he has ever been, certainly to our franchise.
Halo 5 struck me as a very strange direction to take the series, story wise at least.
Halo 4 was the first I've ever been interested in Chief as an actual character. There was some legit depth given to him in 4's story, something the other games did not have. For them to do a complete 180 and focus on an entirely different character (a boring character none the less) struck me as completely baffling.
avoided Halo 5 because of the game I will not name.
Always heard the campaign was pretty meh but wasn't the multiplayer pretty solid? May eventually dive into it. Fairly large community still or has it died out?
This is where MS fucked up real bad. Extra-material gone off the rails. There are literally books worth of gaps between games.I mean.... Halo 5 isn't great story-wise, but it is far better than the atrocity of Halo 4. A Cortana bubble to save Chief? A one off bad guy in the Didact? Who is the Librarian again?
Yeah, and it's just like so bizarre that any of them missed that. I think they thought they thought they were pulling a Metal Gear Solid 2 or something with the way the game was being marketed and hyped up, and everything would turn out alright once people played the game. The difference with MGS2 though was that what we got with that ended up being just as good if not better than what people were expecting and Raiden ended up being fantastic. That's why people were willing to accept that (well, most people anyway--even with the MGS2 twist there are still a contingent that didn't like it, which just shows how risky doing stuff like that is). Halo 5 wasn't that though. That's a case of the lie and the marketing being better than the actual product. When you not only lie to people about what will lie in the game but the lie ends up being better than what you actually give them, people will get upset. Don't get how they missed something so basic, but they did.Come on Frank. No way you underestimated what Chief meant. Just like the monks, Marty's themes, the armor, you have to realize this is a mature and established series. You didn't even need to have Chief. But when you promise his saga, saying things like the seeds of our future are sown in his past, promise Blue Team and Chief going rogue and yet we play as Locke and Osiris for the majority, there was going to be backlash. Frank understands the fans more than anyone.
So being a non Halo fan, could someone please explain Master Chief's appeal to me? He's always struck me as just another generic space marine
As long as it takes more than 4 hours and 45 minutes of gameplay to beat Halo 6, it'll be a marked improvement.