Originally Posted by DerpHause
Fundamentally, yes, there is a lot of business sense to be made in profiteering through moves directly antagonistic to consumers, but I can assure you they're in no need of forum warrior defenses of those moves.
I can't really fathom why the preferable stance here is "Sit down" and shut up because Papa Sony has made up his mind. Even if you don't care, especially if you acknowledge it doesn't detract from anything you want, what do you get by actively antagonizing someone for socially pushing a feature a lot of us want WHEN YOU'RE ACTUALLY ASKED ABOUT IT IN AN INTERVIEW AND YOU CAN'T ANSWER FOR THE OPPOSING PARTY!
why do some of you just jump into 'warrior defending'?
sure the sit down was rude(to you all, it's a joking phrase where i'm from), i admitted that and apologised and it's in the same quote??
to the bold:
Originally Posted by Mubrik
and is also a good reason to be vocal on forums,
i can see that now and i agree with you.
i just felt there was zero chance at this,
hopefully it happens i guess.
and sony did talk about their view/response in some way (maybe not officially)
they gave a bullish pr response which included 'for the children' which we all know is rubbish and makes their stance on this very obvious.
i mean he did start the phrase with 'we talk to sony all the time' you think he doesn't know their views?. sure
i'm not antagonising phil or anyone man (or at least trying to), if xbox was market leader shu would probably be the one asking for cross play and mattrick wouldn't even respond...
but people want it so it's okay to be vocal and hopefully it actually comes, wouldnt mind owning some xbox players in RL tbh. lol