ECJ said:The temporary reproduction on a multimedia player of a copyright-protected work obtained by streaming is not exempt from the right of reproduction.
Previously, there were folks in the EU who argued that streaming pirated content was exempt from copyright law because they weren't saving files, just viewing them.
Until this week, when the ECJ ruled on BREIN vs. Filmspeler and definitively said that this was not the case.
*Bold is in original quoteECJ said:The Court also finds that temporary acts of reproduction, on that multimedia player, of a copyright protected work obtained by streaming on a website belonging to a third party offering that work without the consent of the copyright holder, cannot be exempted from the right of reproduction.
Under the directive, an act of reproduction is only exempt from the right of reproduction if it satisfies five conditions, namely (1) the act is temporary, (2) it is transient or incidental, (3) it is an integral and technical part of a technological process, (4) the sole purpose of that process is to enable a transmission in a network between third parties by an intermediary or a lawful use of a work or subject matter, and (5) that act does not have any independent economic significance.
Those conditions are cumulative in the sense that non-compliance with one of them will lead to the act of reproduction not being exempted. Furthermore, the exemption is to be applied only in certain special cases which do not impair the normal exploitation of the work or other subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.
No more arguing that it's only illegal to host pirated content in the EU. If you are downloading or streaming pirated content in the EU, you're officially breaking the law.
Source:
http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2017-04/cp170040en.pdf
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-527/15