What's your argument, exactly?
Is the manufacturing of canola oil somehow bad for you? If so, how exactly?
Are the temperatures we cook canola at bad for us? If so, how exactly?
Or is this just yet another "Processed foods are bad, mmmkay?" argument?
Same for you. Enriched and fortified foods are good things. Refining is just a process of removing shit you don't want from what you do want.
When people are saying fruit juice is bad what kind of fruit juice is that exactly? I have the orange one where I just put a thumbs thickness of juice in it and dilute the rest with water. Are these bad too? Or is it the pure orange/apple juice kind that are bad?
Bread consumed in 10,000 BC is not the same as most bread consumed in 2013 AD.
funny thing is the human gut never stops adapting to changing environments. It's a very efficient system.
The only "bad" bread is stuff like Wonder Bread. Buy good quality whole grain bread and pay attention to the ingredients. Modern bread has been about the same for a long time and the only difference is the spngy, white bread that you find in many supermarkets that is like $2 for a loaf.
The problems of the American diet in the last 50 or so years is the reliance on fast food and the lack of fruits and vegetables and drinking lots and lots of sugary drinks.
Low carb and paleo "work" in the sense that many people overeat starchy and carb loaded foods (look at the typical "american" food: fried breaded chicken, potatoes, corn; better choice: grilled chicken breast, "California mix" veggies). With substituting lean meats and vegetables, you've effectively changed your diet for the better. This isn't new. That's why in a lot of success stories, people have gone from a diet heavy in junk food to diets loaded with veggies and lean meat. It's a no-brainer.
Just a 30-45 min. walk to the gym deads, squats, and bench. For assistance I do chins, pulls, leg press, and rows-just recently.
I'm 5'7'' 170 lbs. last I checked, it's around 4:00 AM here and I apologize if I'm not being too clear on things.
Additionally, I started Intermittent Fasting a few years ago and I eat within an 8 hour window after working out, usually about 20 oz. of chocolate milk, and a tin of sardines sometimes in water, no extra PUFA besides that in the fish.
Then I walk back, liver once a week, at least 4 oz., other days steak post workout, steak usually every day, eggs at night, lots of cheese and kerrygold butter or coconut oil. A glass of orange juice to wash things down if I feel like it, definitely fruit, maybe ice cream.
It's my personal paleo basically with the addition of sugar, mostly from fruit related things, and I feel very good on it.
If you're interested in it in more depth, Ray Peat, who basically coined this way of eating long ago, goes into various detail throughout his site in articles.
Here's a list of more candid exchanges between him and others detailing his beliefs in a more base way as some find his articles overly complex and I skim them mostly:
http://peatarian.com/?qa=private-corresponding#58.
Good night and be good.
Bonus:Fun coffee article. http://raypeat.com/articles/articles/caffeine.shtml
You don't really transition to lean meats when doing low-carb.
This. People say it's a no-brainer but it isn't as you can see from the post you quoted. To go LCHF is to go against what most of the dietary/nutritionist community advocates. You are going against the grain. Doing simple low crab without upping your fat is a terrible idea. You'll feel tired all the time and you'll become depressed.
Legit question - if I eat 5 times the carbs I'm "supposed" to eat, but while on a calorie deficit, does it matter at all? It's just... Well, including myself, I know a ton of people who eat a lot or carbs and are not overweight or sick. And I myself I'm pretty sedentary to boot.
This. People say it's a no-brainer but it isn't as you can see from the post you quoted. To go LCHF is to go against what most of the dietary/nutritionist community advocates. You are going against the grain. Doing simple low crab without upping your fat is a terrible idea. You'll feel tired all the time and you'll become depressed.
It's a bit difficult for me to believe a ton of people can eat plenty of carbs while other people can't at all. Why would fat storage vary so much? It's just weird. My Japanese relatives would have two bowls of white rice with breakfast alone, and they're absolutely not overweight. Nor athletes. I mean, it's just weird to me, I don't claim to be right.
Legit question - if I eat 5 times the carbs I'm "supposed" to eat, but while on a calorie deficit, does it matter at all? It's just... Well, including myself, I know a ton of people who eat a lot or carbs and are not overweight or sick. And I myself I'm pretty sedentary to boot.
That's what carbs are for. A reduction not complete removal. That's why the standard diet guide contains suggestions for stuff like whole grains.
You won't really gain weight at a caloric deficit like that but time may catch up to you later on. By eating like that you may be skinny but still have a less than flattering amounts of body fat on you (skinny-fat like body) ). But there are other health issues as to why you'd want to reduce your carbs (such as the increase of the small dense LDL cholesterol (pattern B) or mouth hygiene). If you want to lose weight, nothing beats low carb + caloric deficit.
No. That's what fat is for. If you eat a lot of carbs your body won't use its fat reserves as effectively due to insulin. The foot pyramid is fucked and advocates wayyyy to many grains, and too little fat (dat Agricultural subsidy). They advocate something like 6+ servings of carb heavy food products and only 0-3 servings of fat. That's ridiculous. No wonder everyone is getting fat.
Bread is basically sugar, all refined carbs, and shoots your blood sugar level faster than sucrose. For the calories you get it's also pretty low in nutrients. So if you are worried about your weight you shouldn't eat too much of it.
White bread and multi grain is all the same shit.
Yeah this worked for me. Eating keto dropped my cholesterol from over 200 to 113 with most of it being HDL......according to doctors i should be having a heart attack from eating a dozen eggs and a package of bacon a day.
My diet is different now but it did what I needed it to do.
Now I just eat grilled chicken breast, broccoli, and 1 serving of almonds a day.
Uh, they have updated the food guide since then.
Everyone is getting fat because of sugary drinks and bad food and no exercise. You have like a large percentage of Americans getting most of their caloric intake from soda alone.
Still says the same thing: http://www.health.gov.sk.ca/canadas-food-guide
Fat isn't even on the list.
What does the USDA say?
http://www.choosemyplate.gov/
Again no fat shown in the image. Most of your energy comes from the carbs since they exclude fats and promote grain. And when they do they claim canola oil is healthy.
True. I'm not saying I completely agree with the USDA suggestions. Stuff like olive oil, nuts and meats have been quite demonized when they're actually beneficial.
That's the problem with demonizing foods, it leads to extremes. Yes, most people need to limit their carbs to 2-3 servings of whole grains . Yes, they need to add more fats to feel full. They also need to eat a lot more vegetables, which to a lot of Americans mean bland, boiled all to hell vegetables which is not the case in many other cultures.
And eggs, people still believe they raise cholesterol.
As always, go to a professional and don't rely on the internet.
That doesn't solve anything and that's exactly why everyone is so confused about what to eat and what not to eat. There's too much noise.
It's a bit difficult for me to believe a ton of people can eat plenty of carbs while other people can't at all. Why would fat storage vary so much? It's just weird. My Japanese relatives would have two bowls of white rice with breakfast alone, and they're absolutely not overweight. Nor athletes. I mean, it's just weird to me, I don't claim to be right.
That doesn't solve anything and that's exactly why everyone is so confused about what to eat and what not to eat. There's too much noise.
Ok, take me for example.A year ago I was between 350-400 pounds, being a lacto-ovo vegetarian whose diet was almost exclusively junk food. For dinner each night I'd have 4 blocks of fucking RAMEN with marinara sauce. Every night. for years. I say I was between 350-400 pounds because I could never find a scale that went high enough even if for some reason I'd WANTED to know the ugly truth.
A year later, still a lacto-ovo vegetarian but now out of a shitty marriage and reclaiming my life. Now I'm down to 195 and log every one of my daily 1,750 calorie allotment on My Fitness Pal. I have good reason to suspect that I'll hit my goal of 160 by the end of summer.
Now, being a vegetarian a lot of sources of protein and fat are lost to me. I eat TONS of eggs, full-fat yogurt, peanuts, etc... because otherwise my diet would be entirely plant-based carbs. As it is my diet is between 55-60% carbohydrates daily, and I eat roughly 250g of carbohydrates daily.
Carbs aren't the devil necessarily, it's largely due to what they come from to my understanding. I may eat 250g of carbs a day, but it doesn't come from much bread which I eat exceedingly rarely. I eat tons of beans, lentils, and every morning for breakfast I eat 12 ounces of oatmeal, which is a real treat.
I keep my sugar intake to around 35g daily and my fiber intake is up around 50-70g daily.
As has been said, carb source is so important and while I'm no scientist perhaps your Japanese relatives have evolved subtly over time to metabolize rice more efficiently due to it being a staple. It might also be due to their activity levels, genetics, or what the REST of their diet consists of.
In several weight loss communities I belong to, including here on GAF, I'll admit the zeitgeist seems to be centered around low-carb eating. Maybe if I could do it and ate meat I would have lost even more weight even more quickly. I can't really attest either way.
What I can promise you is that low-carb, while an excellent way, is not the only way. Even with my ingesting huge amounts of carbohydrates every day I've done alright.
I can't really answer the question "Is bread really that bad for you?". It's quite complicated, as you can see. I still eat it occasionally, myself. I can answer, from my own experience, that carbs themselves aren't necessarily that bad for you.
I'd sincerely like to try low-carb some time, but I just can't bring myself to eat meat and don't feel like putting the effort to figure out if there is a way for vegetarians to do it since I'm having pretty good luck with my current system.
Ok, take me for example.A year ago I was between 350-400 pounds, being a lacto-ovo vegetarian whose diet was almost exclusively junk food. For dinner each night I'd have 4 blocks of fucking RAMEN with marinara sauce. Every night. for years. I say I was between 350-400 pounds because I could never find a scale that went high enough even if for some reason I'd WANTED to know the ugly truth.
A year later, still a lacto-ovo vegetarian but now out of a shitty marriage and reclaiming my life. Now I'm down to 195 and log every one of my daily 1,750 calorie allotment on My Fitness Pal. I have good reason to suspect that I'll hit my goal of 160 by the end of summer.
Carb back loading and loving it. Losing fat and gaining muscle and strength. Don't really care what the "experts" have to say.
Geez, 400 pounds while being a vegetarian. My dreams of eating health & not gaining any weight just shattered.
The fact you lost over 50% of that in a year is proof whatever diet you are on now is solid.
Geez, 400 pounds while being a vegetarian. My dreams of eating health & not gaining any weight just shattered.
The fact you lost over 50% of that in a year is proof whatever diet you are on now is solid.
Well, the first step is to stop equating vegetarianism with "eating healthy."
Came for Scott Pilgrim gif, OP didn't disappoint.