Considering that Primal was the best selling Far Cry game, I think it was a good idea to try a new setting. Western did work very well with RDR and there isn't almost AAA competition with this setting. So I assume a Far Cry somewhere else (as a western) would work very well.
Luckily for you they've been reimagining Far Cry 3 for their last 3 games.Just take Far Cry 3 and reimagine it in a western setting. I'll be sold times a million.
Luckily for you they've been reimagining Far Cry 3 for their last 3 games.
Primal might have had the biggest launch or something, but I'd be surprised if it was the biggest-selling overall. Do you have a link?
Far Cry: Call of Juarez
Most amazing crossover ever
My body is ready
Far Cry: Call of Juarez
Most amazing crossover ever
My body is ready
Just take Far Cry 3 and reimagine it in a western setting. I'll be sold times a million.
So Ubi has moved away from AC to Far Cry as their yearly release now?
So Ubi has moved away from AC to Far Cry as their yearly release now?
I thought Far Cry 4 and Primal were trash but this
this i could get behind
We need more Vaas
Exactly. Even if I feel MGSV could have executed its own formula far better (more dynamic, emergent encounter variety on the open world), it had numerous moments far more reminiscent of Far Cry 2 than any Far Cry since.
I don't believe Ubisoft will ever go back to that formula, but I just want them to dial back the faux-RPG XP tracking, skill and ability bottlenecking, objective and statistic checklisting, and formulaic game system structure alongside open world design so prevalent in Far Cry 3, 4, and Primal. They're weird in that sense; so formulaic that I just don't feel the experience of play can surprise me, either in discovering something or simply experiencing a unique, emergent sequence. The game systems never really come together in that way for me.
PLEASE DO THIS. Call of Juarez was great and I would kill for a Wild West styled FarCry game.
It looks like sites like VG247 are only reporting that this is the old west because of a 2015 Ubisoft survey asking if fans wanted to see a Far Cry game in the old west, which is... bizarre.How about a modern western instead of old west? We already have a RDR coming out, lets see FC do something different.
It looks like sites like VG247 are only reporting that this is the old west because of a 2015 Ubisoft survey asking if fans wanted to see a Far Cry game in the old west, which is... bizarre.
Yeah possibly.This is probably the worst kind of rumor for Ubisoft, because now they'll have a ton of people who want a Wild West game, and are instead going to get something they feel is incredibly boring.
This is probably the worst kind of rumor for Ubisoft, because now they'll have a ton of people who want a Wild West game, and are instead going to get something they feel is incredibly boring.
Why would you set the game in Montana of all places and not have it be Wild West?
Why would you set the game in Montana of all places and not have it be Wild West?