Is the general consensus that JC2 is the better game?
While JC3 was ok, I found it to be far inferior to JC2 overall. Overly-serious story/writing (far less of the charmingly-camp tone from JC2), less map variety, having to do the same old terrible time trial challenges over and over and over again to unlock new upgrades, horrible bike physics, poorly-designed missions, etc. It feels very rushed, which makes sense when you consider the supposed development hell the game went through (Jim Sterling mentioned that Square initially had Avalanche make it an online-only thing to begin with, similarly to how they fucked around with Deus Ex).Is the general consensus that JC2 is the better game?
This game is great for a hybrid approach, gamepad for some things (most vehicles, wingsuiting) and KB/M for gunplay and accurate tethering
It's a tough one, JC3's destruction and gameplay is better by a long shot (outside of the driving...which is possibly the worst driving in an open world game I've ever experienced, It's unreal that the same studio put out Mad Max)
you have very poor vision or you dont understand what aliasing is.
"dark souls 3 is virtually prerendered quality." lol
Yes, it is everyone else who is crazy and doesn't know what they're talking about. That must be it.
Just Cause 3 is only considered a AAA game because it cost $60. Just Cause games have never really been AAA in terms of quality imo.
Just Cause 2 was better than most AAA games of its era, not only in quality of gameplay but also technical achievement.
Just Cause 3 dropped my jaws on the PC. Probably the best explosions in a video game.Just cause 2 was rather impressive for its time. Esp considering it was a console port. Def an aaa game in terms of tech and visuals imo. Just cause 3 comes off more like a low budget, 20$ game
def good but not far enough ahead of other games to bring up the overall package to aaa imo. World in conflict was a game of its time that had explosions just leagues ahead of the entire industryJust Cause 3 dropped my jaws on the PC. Probably the best explosions in a video game.
They were good, and indeed bountiful, but it shipped the same year Crysis did.def good but not far enough ahead of other games to bring up the overall package to aaa imo. World in conflict was a game of its time that had explosions just leagues ahead of the entire industry
They were good, and indeed bountiful, but it shipped the same year Crysis did.
IQ wasn't a major issue for me at 1440p. The last game that made me reach for SweetFX and heavy downsampling was BF4.
World in conflict explosions put those in crysis to shame
Yet it's oh so worth it.Nah that belongs to Hellblade in 60fps mode
Speak for yourself, it ruins a otherwise beautiful game.Yet it's oh so worth it.
This game is great for a hybrid approach, gamepad for some things (most vehicles, wingsuiting) and KB/M for gunplay and accurate tethering