osiris3355
Banned
What? It authenticates by your voice. Other people cant wake it up with the command.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Google Home |OT| - I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that outside of the U.S.
- Thread starter Jzero
- Start date
- Status
What? It authenticates by your voice. Other people cant wake it up with the command.
Yep. I've tested this before on my phone too, having friends say "Okay, Google" (even ones with similarly deep voices) and it's never activated unless I'm the one speaking.
On phones. As I understand those types of features like placing phone calls, texts and calendar events aren't enabled for Google Home at this point. I wouldn't be surprised if the reason is the need to implement something that works through this issue.
osiris3355
Banned
It's not the same on Google Home with the OK Google voice training?
This is basically why I went with the Echo over the Home. Amazon knows about what I buy, Google knows about my whole life. It's just too easy anyone to access my personal stuff via a simple question to Home.
Then if I turn on voice authentication, I'd be the only person who can use it for anything from what I'm reading. Sorry houseguest, you can't turn off the lights I have set to activate with voice commands!
Vyse The Legend
Member
I get this rationale. However, these are solvable issues. I can think of any number of solutions. Here's a very basic one: "Hey Google, turn on guest mode" and this would put Home in a state where it would answer any voice queries but block off commands that tap into your personal Google account. Done.
For now, I agree. There's no reason to rush out and get one, but in the long term, I think Home is going to utterly dwarf the Echo's capabilities and functionality (it already does in some ways).
Oh definitely, and they have said they're already looking at solutions. I'm just talking about right now, and what devices do what at this point in time. In addition to the above, the GH doesn't yet support the smart lights/bulbs we use, so it was already heavily favored towards the Echo.
Both devices and services will certainly evolve, and if Amazon just lays there and lets the Home walk all over the Echo then they deserve to be pushed out of the market. Now that they have competition, I think we'll see more feature packed updates for the Echo.
outunderthestars
Banned
Has any review said which sounds better?
For reviews that actually say there's a difference, most say GH has better lows, and the Echo has better mids and highs. It's basically a wash.
Vyse The Legend
Member
Based on reviews: At higher/max volume, Echo apparently fairs better. At mid-to-low volumes, the sound is better on the Home. So, as Chorazin said, it's a wash.
I have both, but I won't be home until tomorrow. I will compare then and post my thoughts, if someone else doesn't post their own impressions before then.
outunderthestars
Banned
So from what I've seen of reviews people say that Google Home sounds better at mid-range, mid-volume but has a tendency to distort more at higher volumes and frequencies. Most reviews seemed to agree that if you really care about getting the best audio, you'll use your own speaker which only the Echo Dot supports (full-sized Echo has no audio out and can't use BT speakers whereas Dot does both, Home doesn't support bluetooth or audio out but you can cast to Googlecast devices, though it's not clear to me if you can use that for voice applications or just music playback).
I would expect that both will eventually get voice-based authentication/identification for certain functions, it seems to be what has to happen. But it's still really early for voice UI.
I'm less sure Google will meaningfully surpass what Amazon is doing though. Things like Google search would be difficult for anyone to match but in most areas Alexa has a huge headstart. They've sold millions of Echo units, they have good brand recognition, more mature development tools and consumer/business/developer interest, that was built up over the last 2 years, not to mention getting existing users to switch is not likely because the device doesn't become obsolete on a fast timescale. What I'd generally expect is is Alexa becomes the lead platform for devices or voice apps for those reasons and that's the stuff that really drives platforms, what are we going to be doing with these that we haven't yet thought about? The little ergonomic things like short and long term memory, command structure and the like will probably converge quickly. But where niche or novel use cases come up, where businesses start adopting hardware and software, that's the sort of ground that's near impossible to make up.
TangoAlphaLima
Member
Tracking info says my Home should be delivered today. Excited!
Vyse The Legend
Member
You can attach a Chromecast Audio to a better speaker, and use Home to control playback to it, too. Another option.
Well, it's not really about the ability to do a basic Google search query; it's more about Google's unmatched natural language processing. Google is way better at interpreting your voice commands without the need for super precise language, whereas the Echo skills practically require you to keep a list of keywords close by for launching the correct skills and actions.
This is honestly why I've had an Echo since launch, but I rarely ever use the 3rd party skills. Pretty much all the reviews agree that, in the places where the two devices have the same skills right now, Home responds correctly way, way more often. I don't know about you, but I get frustrated when my Echo gives a bad response to something or simply says it doesn't understand. I don't see Amazon ever closing this gap; if anything, it will get wider.
Personally, I hope they both succeed. Competition is good in this space. No one expected Amazon to be the first here, but they hit it out of the park and correctly double-downed on what was likely a side project.
Picked up a Home today at Best Buy. I have a Dot in the bedroom for controlling plugs but Home fits in the Living room much better. I can ask it for quick recipes, play my Google music on the chromecast audio. and of course the basic alarms and what not. The voice recognition definitely feels way better, but maybe the Dot just have worse mic. So far, so good. We'll see how it goes in a couple months.
Bboy AJ
My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
Google Home woke up every time somebody said "Ok Google" or "Hey Google." This wasn't just annoying, but it raises some legitimate questions about abuse. I have no doubt advertisers will inevitably try to sneak commands into TV shows and music to have products added to shopping lists or to inject something into a user's search history to set the stage for future ads.
Jzero
Member
Good thing I pay for video/music streaming services that don't have ads
outunderthestars
Banned
Children people?
Jzero
Member
1) Home uses Wi-Fi
2) It responds to everyone
3) Only plays music from the linked music account
currently yea, it won't search your collection.
Jzero
Member
Anyone use hue lights with this thing? I'm interested in some smart home stuff and it seems like hue is the way to go. I thought it was more expensive than it was but a two pack of those regular bulbs are 30. I might through in a few fancy colored ones in there too. Wish they weren't so expensive though.
Jzero
Member
I'm going to be buying the 3rd generation starter kit whenever I have $200 in disposable income available.
Apparently the colors suck compared to cheaper lesser known brand bulbs but the cheap bulbs aren't compatible with Home :\
Don't forget about the hub too. That'll run a bit more.
I've heard the gen 3 bulbs are much better. Especially the greens.
Yeah I ended up ordering the basic hub kit with the regular bulbs for now.
On Alexa you add the news sources you want as skills and they can provide audio if they have it.
Well you don't need to hook it up to your email if you don't want to. Anyway, sending a message pretending to be from someone else is hardly new technology, you could have sent a fake resignation letter at any point in history from the invention of pen and paper. Plus I don't think there's a 'no backsies' rule on fake resignation letters. I mean people could just drop fake letters on their boss' desk from colleagues they don't like if that were the case. It's a terrible example.
Then I guess everything I added on Alexa have no audio source that just seems to me that they have too few of them since they aren't some obscure sources.
So if you check my link above I've conceptualized the problem with a proof-of-concept attack. I could do a bunch of things but consider, I could have a banner ad that triggers a audio sample like "OK, Google send 12345 to verify@ads.com." So I know your anonymized ad Id and I cross reference it with that code I sent, poof, I know your primary email and all of the pages in the ad network you've looked at. Cool huh? That email might even have your name in it, so I might have a real person to attach it to as well. Even further what if I recorded responses to queries using a rogue app or website. Sure you might be able to take back some trolling but first: do you really want to deal with that, and second I can do worse. And all of this can be attached to links or a youtube video or anything else, and it could turn into a modern day Rick Roll.
JonathanNemo
Member
One of the answers to "OK Google, what's your first crush?" is a neat easter egg.
Unfortunately it seems to have changed to something less cute since I connected my thermostat.
"OK Google, can you change your voice?" has an interesting response.
Siri.
"OK Google, can you change your voice?" has an interesting response.
Bboy AJ
My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
Yes, this is a serious concern I have. In addition to advertisers on tv throwing in commands they want Home to pick up. It's a real threat and native advertising programs could have this same issue.
This thing is so amazing and frustrating at the same time. Most frustrations come from the amazing things it does. It floors you by getting really obscure stuff spot on one minute and then it fails miserably the next.
The biggest letdown is it's really not that conversational. For example, you can say "OK Google, who's the head coach of Duke" and it will answer correctly. Follow up with "how old is he?" and it will also answer correctly but say "when's their first game" and it's clueless. The same question combination works with NFL teams but not NBA or college. That's dumb.
Even worse, you can say "okay Google play summer playlist on living room speaker" and it plays. You can then say "OK Google what's this song called" and it will tell you the artist and title. But then if you say "play this song on all speakers" it responds that you need to tell it which song to play when it should should fucking know because it just fucking told me.
Earlier I was interested in hearing definitions for "battery" other than just a thing that stores power. It only told me the definition I didn't want to know. So then I said "tell me other definitions" and it defined the word "other". I think there really needs to be a way to get more info on a screen interface such as your cell phone or laptop.
Overall I love this but it's inconsistencies and limitations are jarring.
The biggest letdown is it's really not that conversational. For example, you can say "OK Google, who's the head coach of Duke" and it will answer correctly. Follow up with "how old is he?" and it will also answer correctly but say "when's their first game" and it's clueless. The same question combination works with NFL teams but not NBA or college. That's dumb.
Even worse, you can say "okay Google play summer playlist on living room speaker" and it plays. You can then say "OK Google what's this song called" and it will tell you the artist and title. But then if you say "play this song on all speakers" it responds that you need to tell it which song to play when it should should fucking know because it just fucking told me.
Earlier I was interested in hearing definitions for "battery" other than just a thing that stores power. It only told me the definition I didn't want to know. So then I said "tell me other definitions" and it defined the word "other". I think there really needs to be a way to get more info on a screen interface such as your cell phone or laptop.
Overall I love this but it's inconsistencies and limitations are jarring.
Turn off personalized results. I don't see a need for Home to access my calendar etc when those things are pretty easily accessible in more secure ways.
I'm enjoying this thing so far. I have that basic Hue set coming tomorrow so I can use it to control my office lights. Using it for spotify has been pretty great so far. I can't wait until more services can make use of this.
Hopefully Vizio updates their TV's soon to support it, I didn't realize they didn't yet. It was pretty magical casting youtube to my other TV though with the regular Chromecast. It's going to be even better when I can tell it to play westworld or something and it just turns on without opening any annoying apps.
Hopefully Vizio updates their TV's soon to support it, I didn't realize they didn't yet. It was pretty magical casting youtube to my other TV though with the regular Chromecast. It's going to be even better when I can tell it to play westworld or something and it just turns on without opening any annoying apps.
I read somewhere that it's an update Google has to make and it's coming soon. They're also going to enable multi speaker streaming on cast enabled speakers.
I'd probably rather have it be google since it'll be quicker I'd think. I kind of like being an early adopter with things like this because I'm going to guess we'll be getting some rapid updates over the next few months.
Sure. But that's a completely different example from the one originally cited. I'm not doubting there are concerns.
OK Google learns your voice on phones though, so you can use it with your phone locked. Doesn't Home do a similar thing? I mean it's an inconvenience when Alexa accidentally triggers, there are practical reasons beyond security why training to a particular voice (or voices) is a good idea.
No, but those features are currently locked, probably for those reasons. It seems likely that they may implement a similar feature for authentication but there's likely a lot of UI that needs to catch up to the context.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked