SonicVolcano
Member
Am I the only one who doesn't give anything about legendaries? Give us more non-legendary Pokemon to catch, please.
Ultra beasts aren't legendariesAm I the only one who doesn't give anything about legendaries? Give us more non-legendary Pokemon to catch, please.
-People who are expecting minor changes like "Emerald" or "Platinum" should be expecting "Ultra Change".
Ultra beasts aren't legendaries
I mean, they're genderless endgame Pokemon that can't breed with a consistent BST of 570, but they're not legendaries because there's more than 1 per playthrough for some of them.
(They're basically legendaries)
So yeah, they're legendaries.Ultra Beasts are sub-legends in the game code, just like Articuno, Moltres, Regirock, Heatran, Landorus, Tapu Koko and Silvally.
I never said there was anything connecting Hoopa to Kalos, though, I'm saying they should have added something to connect it to Hoenn for it to make sense for its rings to appear. Gen IV and Gen V were pretty good about connecting their mythicals to their regions (with the exception of Manaphy who I'll give a pass to since they had a whole storyline centered around its introduction in Pokemon Ranger and Meloetta who I really can't give a pass to). I feel like GameFreak has started slipping since Gen 6 in tying their mythicals in to their region since the only one with any connection is Diancie and that connection is a super bare bones "It's a mutated Carbink" with literally no additional info on how that works.There's not much to be said about Hoopa being connected to Kalos in the first place. While it was introduced in Gen 6, it arguably is more of a new Hoenn element. Certain Legendary and Mythical Pokémon aren't necessarily tied to one specific region. I remember when it was implied Shaymin is linked to Kanto. Still hurts that they didn't seize the opportunity to do something with it in HGSS.
Ultra beasts aren't legendaries
I mean, they're genderless endgame Pokemon that can't breed with a consistent BST of 570, but they're not legendaries because there's more than 1 per playthrough for some of them.
(They're basically legendaries)
So yeah, they're legendaries.
Not my cup of tea, either. I'm more into evolutions and 'semi-legendaries' like Dragonite, Tyranitar etc.
I mean I do get the complaint.
There are currently (pre-USUM)
36 Sub-Legendary Pokémon
20 Legendary Pokémon
18 Mythical Pokémon
So 74 Pokémon out of 802 are Legendary in one way or another.
Now, in Sun & Moon they added
13 Sub-Legends: Type: Null, Silvally, Tapu Koko, Tapu Lele, Tapu Bulu, Tapu Fini, Nihilego, Buzzwole, Pheromosa, Xurkitree, Celesteela, Kartana, Guzzlord
5 Legendary Pokémon: Cosmog, Cosmoem, Solgaleo, Lunala, Necrozma
2 Mythical Pokémon: Magearna, Marshadow
So 20 new Legendary Pokémon in Sun & Moon alone.
Then we add in the three we know of from USUM (assuming they are categorised as Sub-Legends) and we're at 23 of 77 Legendary Pokémon being from Generation VII
Legendary Pokémon evolve now
Am I the only one who doesn't give anything about legendaries? Give us more non-legendary Pokemon to catch, please.
Curious what they mean by this. Hope leveling up to 100 is a lot easier at least.
Am I the only one who doesn't give anything about legendaries? Give us more non-legendary Pokemon to catch, please.
I thought that was a godsend for getting specific EV values tbh.I hope it means something like the Super Training instead of Evelup isle.
I mean I do get the complaint.
There are currently (pre-USUM)
36 Sub-Legendary Pokémon
20 Legendary Pokémon
18 Mythical Pokémon
So 74 Pokémon out of 802 are Legendary in one way or another.
Now, in Sun & Moon they added
13 Sub-Legends: Type: Null, Silvally, Tapu Koko, Tapu Lele, Tapu Bulu, Tapu Fini, Nihilego, Buzzwole, Pheromosa, Xurkitree, Celesteela, Kartana, Guzzlord
5 Legendary Pokémon: Cosmog, Cosmoem, Solgaleo, Lunala, Necrozma
2 Mythical Pokémon: Magearna, Marshadow
So 20 new Legendary Pokémon in Sun & Moon alone.
Then we add in the three we know of from USUM (assuming they are categorised as Sub-Legends) and we're at 23 of 77 Legendary Pokémon being from Generation VII
Legendary Pokémon evolve now
Do the Ultra Beasts really count as Sub-Legends if you can get multiples of them (without cheating in the same game)?
Because by that logic, Dragonite, Tyranitar, Salamence, Metagross, Lucario, Garchomp, Hydreigon, Volcarona, Noivern, Kommo-o and all their respective evolutionary lines would also count as Sub-Legends.
You don't have to appear directly in the games to have context. There is no context for the rings to be in the game at all, that's the problem. Mew is not in Red and Blue but is mentioned in the journals in Cinnabar Mansion, Celebi is not mentioned by name but is spoken of as the forest guardian in Ilex Forest. Like you can write around this really simply. I've got the same issue with Jirachi and Deoxys in Gen III so this isn't just a Hoopa thing for me.
I never said there was anything connecting Hoopa to Kalos, though, I'm saying they should have added something to connect it to Hoenn for it to make sense for its rings to appear. Gen IV and Gen V were pretty good about connecting their mythicals to their regions (with the exception of Manaphy who I'll give a pass to since they had a whole storyline centered around its introduction in Pokemon Ranger and Meloetta who I really can't give a pass to). I feel like GameFreak has started slipping since Gen 6 in tying their mythicals in to their region since the only one with any connection is Diancie and that connection is a super bare bones "It's a mutated Carbink" with literally no additional info on how that works.
There are currently (pre-USUM)
36 Sub-Legendary Pokémon
20 Legendary Pokémon
18 Mythical Pokémon
So 74 Pokémon out of 802 are Legendary in one way or another.
Do the Ultra Beasts really count as Sub-Legends if you can get multiples of them (without cheating in the same game)?
Because by that logic, Dragonite, Tyranitar, Salamence, Metagross, Lucario, Garchomp, Hydreigon, Volcarona, Noivern, Kommo-o and all their respective evolutionary lines would also count as Sub-Legends.
That's correct, all Sub-Legends are categorised as Legendary Pokémon officially, as we saw yesterday with Silvally.I know that this is based on the games' coding, but "sub-Legendary" is a non-existent term in the Pokémon canon. They are coded like this to simplify their treatment as a group in competitions. Coding doesn't dictate lore. It's ultimately a matter of semantics, as Ultra Beasts are equivalent to Legendary Pokémon, but I feel using the term "Legendary" to describe UBs is missing the point. They may as well turn out to be a new class of Pokémon we'll see more of in the future.
I'm not sure about Phione either. In most story-sensitive cases, it's not displayed as a Mythical Pokémon. For example, the recent TPC lore site doesn't include it. It's only ever implied to be Mythical in mechanics-focused contexts and borderline unofficial western sources. I suppose it could be seen as "Mythical by proxy", but from a storyline standpoint, it's closer to Carbink than Cosmog/Cosmoem and Type: Null.
I'm still waiting for gamefreak to announce an "interruption-free" mode. Selecting it will make you fall into a wormhole in the beginning of the game. You'll arrive in an alternative Alola where the entire story doesn't exist. You will be able to travel across Alola free of annoyingly happy npcs bothering you everywhere you go and make your own story instead.
"Here's your starter, now get out there and do whatever the hell you want."
What a great game that would be.
I remember people complaining about the lack of Legendary Pokémon in X and Y (I wasn't on GAF then so I don't know what GAF thought) so now they added 23 instead!!!Having 23 new legendaries in one gen after just six in XY (three at launch) is so bizarre.
I remember people complaining about the lack of Legendary Pokémon in X and Y (I wasn't on GAF then so I don't know what GAF thought) so now they added 23 instead!!!
Having 23 new legendaries in one gen after just six in XY (three at launch) is so bizarre.
I'm still waiting for gamefreak to announce an "interruption-free" mode. Selecting it will make you fall into a wormhole in the beginning of the game. You'll arrive in an alternative Alola where the entire story doesn't exist. You will be able to travel across Alola free of annoyingly happy npcs bothering you everywhere you go and make your own story instead.
"Here's your starter, now get out there and do whatever the hell you want."
What a great game that would be.
I want more alternates evolutions similar to the ones introduced in gen 4.
i want them to commit to crossevos again
everyone knows drampa is dunsparces evolution and alolomola is luvdiscs evolution, just do it already GF
make megamawile and megaudino regular evolutions as well
That's correct, all Sub-Legends are categorised as Legendary Pokémon officially, as we saw yesterday with Silvally.
However, the sublegend category in game code is an easier way of explaining it
My point is that the "SubLegend" label is a little bit shady. From a lore standpoint, we've always known the Legendary Birds and Beasts are Legendary (the very term "Legendary Pokémon" arguably derives from the Birds), for example, and yet they appear under "SubLegend" in coding. By the same token, "SubLegend" may also be used informally for the UBs. It's basically Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3.
It's great that they disambiguated Type: Null / Silvally, but I still think UBs may turn out to be a separate group from Legendaries in the same way Mythicals are. No one doubts that UBs aren't "regular" 'mons, but until TPC directly calls them "Legendary", I wouldn't use that term to describe them.
I hope random trainers have more than one fucking Pokemon.
A Mega Mawile with the ability to use an item would be disgusting
People really don't like story in these games huh? Man Gen 8 will suck for them. Pretty sure gamefreak is going to pump it up storywise with more power to do so.
People really don't like story in these games huh? Man Gen 8 will suck for them. Pretty sure gamefreak is going to pump it up storywise with more power to do so.
-If one just compares the sheer length of the script, US/UM is twice as long compared to Sun and Moon.
Story is fine but the problem (at least for me, everyone else is different) is sun and moon's story doesn't even come close to Gen V's. So it becomes more a chore to read through boring and uninteresting dialogue.
It's not the story that's the problem, but the frequency of interuptions in gameplay because of it. SM at many points felt like you were just being dragged from checkpoint to checkpoint to watch Kukui, Hau, or Lillie blab about some stuff.
You're comparing what are essentially fan groupings with a grouping set by Game Freak here.
Ultra Beast is just an official designation of this group of sub-legendary Pokémon. You're reading way too much into it.
I don't hate the story in SM. I just hate how the game doesn't leave you alone. I remember entering diglett's cave or whatever it is called in SM and immediately running into Hau, who tells me that there are diglett in this cave. You don't say! I wonder how he would like it if I walked up to him in a malasada restaurant to inform him they sell malasada there? And this stuff happens on every route, too. If it isn't Hau, Lillie or Kukui, it's some random schmuck telling you how to pick up berries. Bah. It kills all the sense of adventure and discovery.People really don't like story in these games huh? Man Gen 8 will suck for them. Pretty sure gamefreak is going to pump it up storywise with more power to do so.