Sad Affleck
Member
The ๖ۜBronx;249559248 said:Where? You misunderstood my post and are being needlessly aggressive for some bizarre reason.
- -
To reiterate this was said:
Which implies that Valve take their store cut but doesn't feel a need to find other, more shady, avenues to go down. To which I said:
As I see Valve as the opposite of a paragon for the argument that a company should use profits to better their service. I was then asked for examples, so I said this:
To think me wrong would be to suggest that Valve doesn't look for alternative profits other than the cut they take from the store, and they have persistently bettered their service with the money they've accrued.
Yes, you are completely wrong because Valve doesn't look for alternative profits through shady avenues and they have persistently bettered their service with the money they've accrued. The position you are taking is based literally on nothing.