Always-honest
Banned
If it was like the Vegas games, hell yes.Was it on your MUST BUY list before this thread?
If it was like the Vegas games, hell yes.Was it on your MUST BUY list before this thread?
Why can't MP only games cost $60?If they didn't want to put time into a SP experience then good stuff, I'd rather them not waste time on shoe horning one it. But price the game accordingly.
After years of dormancy, the Rainbow program has been reactivated by a new Six (voiced by Angela Bassett) to combat a new enemy known only as the White Masks. You have been called on to assemble an elite team of specialists from counter-terrorist units around the world, and in Rainbow Six Siege, you will recruit these Operators through various missions, by playing any mode and gaining renown.
They're allowed to crash and burn for it as well.
Why can't MP only games cost $60?
Same here. Neither Evolve nor Titanfall was worth full price, IMHO.Why should they? Not seen any compelling evidence from Evolve or Titanfall.
I don't like when developers/publishers shoehorn multiplayer modes into games designed to be single player, and I shouldn't be upset when they decide not to shoehorn single player modes into a game designed to be multiplayer. I have no problem if game designers stick to thier strengths and focus on what they're good at.
I don't understand. You seem to think SP can be the only way a game cost $60.Why should they? Not seen any compelling evidence from Evolve or Titanfall.
If it was like the Vegas games, hell yes.
They can in theory, it's just that no AAA retail game has made a case for it yet.Why can't MP only games cost $60?
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here. I'd be happier with $50 ($40 on PC) but I fully support this. The data shows very few people care. Sorry folks.Well, there's another 3 Ubisoft episodes for Jimquisition right there. I was starting to get tired of the Konami ones.
Wait, people thought there was single player? Why? Nothing was ever shown.
Titanfall got flack for this, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
Titanfall got flack for this, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it
I'm pretty sure Battlefront got some shit for that. But honestly, after playing Battlefield 3, 4 and Hardline, the lack of a campaign in Battlefront is a plus to me.Titanfall got flack for this, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
Did we believe there would be a single player campaign?
This sucks. You multiplayer only players are the reason for this lol. Seriously this game better not be $60. I don't think the community for this game will last that long and we'll be stuck with another multiplayer disc coaster...
Because Peter came out and said- the data shows nobody cares. You're a vocal minority I think.Titanfall got flack for this, Evolve did too, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
Sure. It just felt like the guy was saying MP only games on principle can't be $60.They can in theory, it's just that no AAA retail game has made a case for it yet.
At least this will have free maps I guess, that's a start.
Titanfall got flack for this, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
Titanfall got flack for this, Evolve did too, and now Rainbow Six is.
However people don't give Battlefront any heat for it.
Come on.
Because people knew from the get go Battlefront wouldn't have a single player mode
There was never any single-player campaign in any of the previous Battlefront titles, so there was no expectation that there would be one in the DICE version.
Rainbow Six is another issue entirely because there has always been a single-player campaign associated with the series.
Watch it cost $60.