|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Gaming | Online | O-T |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:16 PM)
|
PS3 camper gives up right to ever own PS3 for free $7500 PC from PC Gamer
#1
Quote:
source:http://www.pcgamer.com/archives/2006..._-_one_le.html |
|
A soul wandering around Boletaria
(11-17-2006,
02:20 PM)
|
#5
Originally Posted by X26:
They have a contract and a notary to confirm the validity of the binding contract. I'd still break that shit, though |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:20 PM)
|
#8
If there's any sort of legalese involved, I'd give someone (i.e., my wife) a gift of $650 so she could buy herself a Playstation 3. And then I think I'd play it more than her.
Goofy little story this, but I suppose it's PR for PC Gamer (and the insecurities of PC gamers) |
|
(11-17-2006,
02:22 PM)
|
#12
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
Would it really be worth the risk to face getting sued over buying a videogame system? |
|
(11-17-2006,
02:25 PM)
|
#17
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
I see. Well guess you can't let trolling go unjustified right? |
|
A soul wandering around Boletaria
(11-17-2006,
02:26 PM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by PepsimanVsJoe:
Precisely. All these months, I can't justify my PS3 trolling. So I must own a system, it is important. Worth getting sued! Not that they'd actually ever sue me, though, they'd just be SOL because they'd never find out |
|
(11-17-2006,
02:29 PM)
|
#22
I'd take the deal and I'd give 500$ to a friend or relative to have a PS3 all for him/her. Except I'd play it all the time and they wouldn't.
|
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:32 PM)
|
#23
Originally Posted by Animal:
I did too actually. Well it was actually my dad who was with me that told the guy to leave us alone. Of course I was younger and in high school at the time and didn't really need the money. |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:35 PM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by teiresias:
I dunno... according to the original article, it's a "legally binding contract that they will NEVER buy a PlayStation 3!" Sounds pretty ironclad to me ;) http://www.pcgamer.com/archives/2006..._-_pc_gam.html |
|
too mature for this board
(11-17-2006,
02:35 PM)
|
#26
Wow. PC gamers claim to be the most intelligent. But they really do seem insecure and terrified that their platform is dying.
But really, I know a $7500 PC is much more powerful that a $600 console machine, but do PC gamers honestly think that an argument for PCs is even valid at those rates? |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:36 PM)
|
#28
Originally Posted by SickBoy:
So can someone buy it for him as a gift? |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:36 PM)
|
#29
Originally Posted by bengraven:
What, this was just a publicity stunt by a PC gaming magazine |
|
(11-17-2006,
02:37 PM)
|
#31
Originally Posted by Goldrusher:
haha? |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:37 PM)
|
#33
Originally Posted by lockii:
whas crackin' ma wizzle...youse commin to jump some chumps at best buy for theys psfrees yo....if we stealz it they got no case....black powah 4 lyfe (the ps3 is black) |
|
Banned
(11-17-2006,
02:43 PM)
|
#36
Originally Posted by PepsimanVsJoe:
If given the choice between a PS3 or never a PS3, yet a new PC..I'd take the PlayStation 3. Value (7500 versus 600) is not a deciding factor here...it's the games and the life span. I would miss too much when I couldn't have a PS3, and the PC will be outdated within 2 to 3 years anyway. |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:44 PM)
|
#37
Originally Posted by Gexecuter:
Its a publicity stunt, they are not going to sue you. It'll cost them far more to sue you then the cost of the that $7.5k gaming rig. Its also impossible to prove and enforce; what are they going to do? Check your bank statements? Search your home in case you bought with cash? They got a bunch of hits on their website and an article for their magazine; they already got what they want. |
|
(11-17-2006,
02:51 PM)
|
#38
Originally Posted by PepsimanVsJoe:
Seriously if there was no loophole in the contract and I could never play a PS3, I'd take the PS3. The PC will cost 500$ after 3 years anyway and I hate PC gaming. |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:54 PM)
|
#39
Originally Posted by fortified_concept:
They're not going to sue anyone, as was said, it's a publicity stunt. Besides, the way things are going the magazine is going to need all the money they can get to buy their test rigs anyway, pretty soon it'll cost as much to buy a proper gaming PC as it would to mount a defense in a full-blown Supreme Court case. |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:56 PM)
|
#41
Originally Posted by fortified_concept:
Well, you could always sell the 30" lcd monitor and get 360 and Wii to accompany the PC. Seriously no one sane would decline such an offer even if there was no loophole. |
|
Member
(11-17-2006,
02:57 PM)
|
#42
Originally Posted by Dr_Cogent:
Hell yeah that's what I'd do. Surely you can't stop other members of your family/people you live with from purchasing what they want. |
|
(11-17-2006,
03:01 PM)
|
#48
Originally Posted by NME:
I personally would totally buy that at launch. The PSone/two are easily the sexiest systems I have ever owned. |
|
(11-17-2006,
03:01 PM)
|
#50
Originally Posted by syllogism:
who said I'm sane?
Originally Posted by teiresias:
![]() |