|
Member
(04-06-2007, 12:37 AM)
|
Ubisoft viral site...possibily for new Tom Clancy game?
#1
|
|
|
|
Banned
(04-06-2007, 01:03 AM)
|
#3
http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/frm/f/8911019745
Found that from the site. Game must be set in the future because at one point the radio voice says 2026 or something Olympics. S. Korea vs Ghana in the World Cup, in an abbreviated field of contestants. There's also links that trigger different voices but only briefly, one of them says "Sir we have an incoming transmission from Ghost Leader." |
|
Nintendo's Anne Frank
(Don't look in the attic, Drinky.) (04-06-2007, 01:17 AM)
|
#8
The weird part is, everything about the trailer screams Ghost Recon.
All the links are voices of reports of war with Mexico and low-level EMP's being detonated on the NSA, CIA and the Pentagon. There's even one with the general telling Mitchell to take the plaza. Following the storyline of GRAW 2, this could just as easily be Mitchell recovering from the EMP dropped over him. You can even see the target recticules of GRAW in the videos. Could be another Ghost Recon game as well...weird... |
|
We don't know why he keeps buying PAL, either.
(04-06-2007, 01:27 AM)
|
#11
Originally Posted by MirageDwarf:
|
|
Nintendo's Anne Frank
(Don't look in the attic, Drinky.) (04-06-2007, 01:47 AM)
|
#14
Originally Posted by Frenck:
|
|
#upliftingtherace
(04-06-2007, 01:54 AM)
|
#15
wow, how long is this audio file?!?!?
|
|
Member
(04-06-2007, 02:03 AM)
|
#17
Originally Posted by suaveric:
|
|
Member
(04-06-2007, 02:36 AM)
|
#18
If you click on the "JSF28555..." link near the middle of the page, it'll take you to a forum. Nothing much there yet, just a few threads.
Link here: http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/frm/f/8911019745 |
|
360 ain't shit in Japan
(04-06-2007, 03:07 PM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by Cold-Steel:
|
|
Member
(04-09-2007, 07:14 PM)
|
#26
Here's some idle speculation of what the site's address might mean, from a lazy Friday afternoon post on my normal gaming forum site...
Much like NUMB3RS on Friday, if the data works out too perfectly, it's probably wrong. I randomly picked one way to interpret it and got really interesting results. So, I'm probably wrong. If someone's already figure out what it's related to and proven my (admittedly yanked almost out of thin air) theory wrong, just let me know. If not, let me bask in my conspiracy fueled splendor for a few more minutes.... :D
Originally Posted by rothbart on GamerCastNetwork.com:
|