ex0du5
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:40 PM)
#51

HS back in my confirmed-purchases list.
Raist
(08-27-2007, 03:40 PM)
#52

Impossible. I don't trust EGM.

IGN gave HS a 7, they must be right.

I mean, people have been a little bit quick to forget that thanks to IGN, we learned that a MGS trilogy edition was gonna be released on the 360. They deserve a little bit more respect.
Oni Jazar
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

Oni Jazar's Avatar
#53

Originally Posted by Ploid 3.0:
So the 7 is from the guy that had to lower his score by one point if warhawk was above $30? lol
That's what I want to know. 7 is way too low for Wowhawk.
Alcibiades
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

Alcibiades's Avatar
#54

how the heck did some college town in the middle of nowhere get the issues first?

I thought I'd missed some giant thread or something and had missed all the talk...

some more scores:

Corruption & Halo 3 no reviews, just mentioned in wrap-up saying they are worth getting
-"samus looks primed to go out with a bang"
-halo 3 "one of the most ambitous titles you'll ever see"
Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Eternal Sonata - 6, 8, 7
Madden 2008- 9, 9, 8.5
NHL 2008 (EA) - 9.5, 9, 9
Medal of Honor Airborne - 6.5, 8, 5.5

The Mysims 6, 5.5, 6 scores are for Wii
And yeah, Shane gave Heavenly Sword the 9
disappeared
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

disappeared's Avatar
#55

Originally Posted by XHitoshuraX:
You have all overlooked the most important aspect of the issue...


WHAT THE HELL DID THEY SAY ABOUT SILENT HILL 5!?!?!?


ahem.

I think I'll probably just wind up buying this issue because of that story.
WickedLaharl
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

WickedLaharl's Avatar
#56

who are the reviewers for HS? it has gotta work both ways now fellas!
Doc Evils
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

Doc Evils's Avatar
#57

Heavenly Sword Megaton?
Ploid 3.0
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)

Ploid 3.0's Avatar
#58

I think HS can be great. I was playing Crono Trigger recently and thought to myself, "I'm fighting wave after wave of enemies like people said HS would be" the thing that keeps me going on crono is leveling, the story, and such. HS seems to have a great story delivery, and different gameplay segments/puzzles. I doubt it will be like a street fighter story mode of arena after arena fight. There just don't seem to be any exploring. I play DMC over and over due to unlocking things but it's still fun to go through to make mobs look stupid by beating them into the ground until a boss come to slow down my rampage.
Mojovonio
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:41 PM)
#59

i really want to read the HS reviews to see why they liked it so much. The issues in the other reviews seemed pretty big, so maybe they other reviews just blew shit out of proportion.

Who reviewed HS?
flarkminator
To: Microsoft
From: FASA
Thanks for pissing on our legacy, much obliged.
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

flarkminator's Avatar
#60

Originally Posted by MassiveAttack:
rumor Capcom working on Okami Wii
God let the rumor die already
Razoric
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)
#61

Quote:
bioshock 10, 10, 10 gotm
Nice. :D
Visualante
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

Visualante's Avatar
#62

Originally Posted by spwolf:
why?
Post history says his ass is sore after the EGM Lair scores.
GenericPseudonym
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)
#63

Originally Posted by nib95:
Not bad at all for the PS3. Also, considering EGM knocked a whole point off Warhawk for being more than $30, that means Warhawk would have scored 9.5, 9, 9.5!!
That's some rather odd logic...

Anyways with this three score thing, which review is considered the one to be used on sites like metacritic/gamerankings? The highest, lowest, middle, average?
Metalmurphy
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

Metalmurphy's Avatar
#64

So Heavenly Sword no longer sucks?

Or is it EGM that no longer matters?


I'll never understand how GAF works :p
AltogetherAndrews
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

AltogetherAndrews's Avatar
#65

Originally Posted by spwolf:
why?

p.s. thats how I would rate Wowhawk beta... probably even better for final, but it also depends if they tested final version which didnt have many players playing it... it is big difference to beta test with thousands of players...
Because they are a bunch of clowns who clown out real short, and generally uninformative reviews and previews for a living.

But for the record, the Warhawk score seems spot on based on the beta.
gcubed
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

gcubed's Avatar
#66

Originally Posted by Mojovonio:
you're seriously retarded.
? this confuses me
Alcibiades
(08-27-2007, 03:42 PM)

Alcibiades's Avatar
#67

Originally Posted by XHitoshuraX:
You have all overlooked the most important aspect of the issue...


WHAT THE HELL DID THEY SAY ABOUT SILENT HILL 5!?!?!?


ahem.
Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)
Reilly
Self-Confessed Team Killer Scumbag, Want my Gamertag?
(08-27-2007, 03:43 PM)
#68

Originally Posted by GenericPseudonym:
That's some rather odd logic...

actually, no it's not.
Defuser
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:43 PM)

Defuser's Avatar
#69

Originally Posted by MassiveAttack:

rumor Capcom working on Okami Wii
Dammit,that rumor just need to stop.
Sean
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:43 PM)

Sean's Avatar
#70

Actually those Warhawk scores are before the 1 point deduction, 1UP explains it here:

Quote:
Positioning Warhawk's pricing is important for Sony, but the ripple effect has sparked debate within the 1UP Network. Sony won't tell us the pricing plans are, and as a result, EGM reviewers have been forced to include caveats in their write ups. Lead reviewer (and former OPM editor) Joe Rybicki actually placed a note in his review to EGM Reviews Editor Greg Ford that his score should be dropped a whole point if the price was announced above $30, and the other reviewers have expressed concern over how they should judge the game.

"What I don't understand is why Sony can't give us a price when it seems like internally they have one ready. The game is done, our reviewers have been playing it, and each one has asked about the price, which we certainly take into consideration in our reviews," says Ford. "Because of the lead time for a print publication, we're forced to go to print with a caveat in our review addressing this issue. Not ideal, and it seems unnecessary. It's too bad because otherwise, the company has been great getting us the review code, setting up multiplayer play sessions, and providing assets to go along with the review...just no price, which for some consumers is what matters most."
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3161677
syllogism
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:43 PM)

syllogism's Avatar
#71

Quote:
Medal of Honor - 6.5, 8, 5.5
Is this MoH: Airborne?
Dahbomb
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:43 PM)

Dahbomb's Avatar
#72

EGM PS3 scores adjusted for reality:

Heavenly Sword - 9, 9, 10

Warhawk - 9.5, 8, 9.5

:D
Green Shinobi
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)
#73

Originally Posted by $1148 Jack:
People should really take notice of this (hopefully..) If you are a fan of any demo/pre-release beta etc. you should give that precedence over any score received. Much better than trying to convince yourself that the game is either better/worse than when you played it based on opinions other than your own.
Actually, to be honest, and I've said this a couple of times before, I didn't like the combat in the demo terribly much compared to Ninja Gaiden or Devil May Cry. I just felt a lot more limited than those games, probably since there's no block or jump button and the camera is largely fixed.

I was hoping, however, that it's something that you grow to love over a few hours with it.
Guy Legend
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

Guy Legend's Avatar
#74

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
NHL - 9.5, 9, 9
Wow, that's EA's NHL 08 right? No NHL 2k8?
Alcibiades
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

Alcibiades's Avatar
#75

Originally Posted by syllogism:
Is this MoH: Airborne?
yes
Visualante
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

Visualante's Avatar
#76

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
The Mysims 6, 5.5, 6 scores are for Wii
Shame, a lot of people were looking forward to that as an exclusive
I'm shocked Shane is the 9 actually when he criticised the lack of platforming. I guess it's not game breaking now he has had the chance to play the entire game.
B-Rad Lascelle
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)
#77

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
NHL - 9.5, 9, 9
Is that for NHL 08 or NHL 2K8? I'm assuming the former and that these scores are for X360 (predominantly), but clarification would be welcomed.
AgentOtaku
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

AgentOtaku's Avatar
#78

whats some of the grips of Mysims??

...my wife is crazy hyped for it, so I hope it doesn't completely blow =/
Y2Kev
Favorite Poster on the Citadel
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

Y2Kev's Avatar
#79

Hey, those are good scores.

I am excited to try those games.

edit: Fall 2008?!?!? What the FUCK
GenericPseudonym
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)
#80

Originally Posted by Reilly:
actually, no it's not.
You're adding points to a score, because of an offhand quote from one guy. That's just reatrded.
cw_sasuke
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:44 PM)

cw_sasuke's Avatar
#81

only one rumor ?
plagiarize
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:45 PM)

plagiarize's Avatar
#82

Originally Posted by spwolf:
there you go... HS PS3 GOTY. As EXPECTED.
you really think 8,8,9 is a GOTY kind of score? it's a good score, but i expect ratchet and clank and uncharted to both do better.
XHitoshuraX
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:45 PM)
#83

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)
Is that a cruel joke? -_-
Alcibiades
(08-27-2007, 03:45 PM)

Alcibiades's Avatar
#84

Originally Posted by Guy Legend:
Wow, that's EA's NHL 08 right? No NHL 2k8?
yeah EA's NHL for 360 & PS3 (same with Madden)
Splatt
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)

Splatt's Avatar
#85

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Well fuck. Now i have no idea if i should pick WA5 or not. Dammit EGM!
bud
straight
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)

bud's Avatar
#86

what did they say about silent hill 5 besides the release date?
GenericPseudonym
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)
#87

Originally Posted by Dahbomb:
EGM PS3 scores adjusted for reality:

Heavenly Sword - 9, 9, 10

Warhawk - 8.5, 8, 8.5

:D
Whaa? What kind of reality is that? HS deserves a higher score because I think so?
Like the hat?
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)

Like the hat?'s Avatar
#88

I do not have a 360 or a pc that could possibly run bioshock. that being said, i played the demo at a friends house, and long story short i will be picking up a 360 as soon as financially possible. my god, what a game.
Visualante
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)

Visualante's Avatar
#89

Originally Posted by gcubed:
? this confuses me
I think that it is getting annoying that game X score = game Y score comparisons to support forum arguments. That could be the reason for the retard comment.
XHitoshuraX
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)
#90

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)

Details man, details!
Mojovonio
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)
#91

Originally Posted by gcubed:
? this confuses me
because he's calling it the PS3 GOTY when the 2 biggest games haven't even been released yet, maybe?
tribal24
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:46 PM)

tribal24's Avatar
#92

Originally Posted by plagiarize:
you really think 8,8,9 is a GOTY kind of score? it's a good score, but i expect ratchet and clank and uncharted to both do better.
i expect rachet to get the same score actually or alittle better
Weisheit
Junior Member
(08-27-2007, 03:47 PM)
#93

Originally Posted by nib95:
Not bad at all for the PS3. Also, considering EGM knocked a whole point off Warhawk for being more than $30, that means Warhawk would have scored 9.5, 9, 9.5!!

Considering the $40 price isn't even an issue for me, it's basically a AAA online experience according to EGM. I absolutely loved the BETA, and it's a day one purchase for me.

Quote:
warhawk 8.5, 7, 8.5
Even with your twisted logic your wrong.
Norml
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:47 PM)

Norml's Avatar
#94

Both PS3 games should score no less, but Bioshock is over rated.

PS3 will never get a 10 with all the nitpicking it gets.
godhandiscen
There are millions of whiny 5-year olds on Earth, and I AM THEIR KING.
(08-27-2007, 03:47 PM)

godhandiscen's Avatar
#95

Originally Posted by Alcibiades:
how the heck did some college town in the middle of nowhere get the issues first?

I thought I'd missed some giant thread or something and had missed all the talk...

some more scores:

Corruption & Halo 3 not reviews
Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Eternal Sonata - 6, 8, 7
Madden 2008- 9, 9, 8.5
NHL 2008 (EA) - 9.5, 9, 9
Medal of Honor - 6.5, 8, 5.5

The Mysims 6, 5.5, 6 scores are for Wii
And yeah, Shane gave Heavenly Sword the 9
Then MP:C wont even get a game of the month.
Busty
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:47 PM)
#96

Whatever happened to the reviews and rumours from the Game Informer that had Borderlands on the cover?
AltogetherAndrews
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:48 PM)

AltogetherAndrews's Avatar
#97

Originally Posted by Visualante:
I think that it is getting annoying that game X score = game Y score comparisons to support forum arguments. That could be the reason for the retard comment.
His comment was warranted though, as it was a response to someone mentioning "6.5s" as if there had been more than one such score. Mojovonio calling the guy retarded, however, was just Mojovonio being his usual charming nasty self and was certainly not warranted.

Originally Posted by Mojovonio:
because he's calling it the PS3 GOTY when the 2 biggest games haven't even been released yet, maybe?
Did you quote the wrong post then or what?
GenericPseudonym
Banned
(08-27-2007, 03:48 PM)
#98

So is HS an 8 or a 9?
gcubed
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:48 PM)

gcubed's Avatar
#99

Originally Posted by Mojovonio:
because he's calling it the PS3 GOTY when the 2 biggest games haven't even been released yet, maybe?
didnt think that poster said it. That poster mentioned 6.5's for warhawk and tried to dispell the fact that somehow their were multiple low scorew
nib95
Member
(08-27-2007, 03:48 PM)

nib95's Avatar
#100

Originally Posted by Sean:
Actually those Warhawk scores are before the 1 point deduction, 1UP explains it here:



http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3161677

Actually you are wrong. The price was announced a few weeks back. That article dates to the first of this month. The review was published but a week ago. Which means they would have known about the price. But nice try :D