Livin_Lovin
Member
For those referencing PDZ, let's just say ALL the major online publications (other than Hsu) got it completely wrong. 1UP - 9.0, Gamespot - 9.0, IGN - 8.4
KingOfAllChaos said:No, Halo 2 (Xbox version) got 9/10 for both its single-player and multiplayer, while the PC port got 6/10.
No way. Halo 2 had a great campaign that receives far too much hate.Concept17 said:6/10 sounds right for SP in general. 8/10 overall would be best suited imo.
Joe Molotov said:I can't believe no one's mentioned Paper Mario : The Thousand Year Door's epic review from Game Informer. :lol
"6.75, too kiddie to appeal to our target readers."
meppi said:NiGHTS takes the cake for me, but that was already mentioned.
So Excite Truck:
Gamespot: 6.8 out of 10
EDGE: 6/10
GameTrailers: 6.5/10
1UP: 7/10
etc.
ugh
jjasper said:I mentioned it on the first page
The text in that review is some of the best shit I've ever read in a game mag.Tiktaalik said:Halverson's acid trip Cybermorph review. It was given around a 90/100 I believe and game of the month. I have the scans of the article somewhere on my computer at home.
EGM in comparison gave it around 50%.
Well who knows.gregor7777 said:Perhaps a bit high, but come on, it's a 9-9.5 game.
Livin_Lovin said:Kingdom Hearts 2 - 7.6 (IGN)
eXistor said:Meh, it deserved it imo.
Livin_Lovin said:Deserved. Stupid fun (At most) and not much else. It had like 3 modes and all of them were paired down to barely anything.
Gamer @ Heart said:10.0 Gears of War. 1up.
I give Daytona USA a 1/10. 3 tracks and 2 cars? What is this stupid shit?Livin_Lovin said:Deserved. Stupid fun (At most) and not much else. It had like 3 modes and all of them were paired down to barely anything.
a Master Ninja said:Twilight Princess getting an 8.8 shouldn't have the been the spectacle it was on the internet. The text of the review mostly justified why the reviewer gave it that score.
Ha, my racer has 1 extra track and also an extra car! Take that!Segata Sanshiro said:I give Daytona USA a 1/10. 3 tracks and 2 cars? What is this stupid shit?
WHAT?! :lolJan said:Cristian Gamers reviews
Ninja Gaiden
Graphics -- 10
Sound -- 9
Playability -- 10
adjustment to the Christian moral -- 0
Overall -- 0
No, this one's pretty correct, actually.tanod said:5.0 - Killzone: Liberation review at 1UP is another
Did they ever explain/apologize or do anything? I know Patrick Klepek caught a lot of shit for it during interviews with Itagaki (even though he had nothing to do with it).dark10x said:The C- for Ninja Gaiden was insane as well. In retrospect, I just can't even believe that such a score was awarded as the game really is incredible.
play said:What MotorStorm has become to racing and Odin Sphere to action role-playing, Heavenly Sword is now to 3D action: Perfection.
You and your SEGA Rally.meppi said:Ha, my racer has 1 extra track and also an extra car! Take that!
Came here to post this. The guy's a fucking douchedrohne said:toastyfrog on ug+g in three different outlets, never forget...though i've actually forgotten whether they were 4s or 4.5s
I think you and I fundamentally disagree on what makes a game good, but hey - diversity is the strength of humanity.Livin_Lovin said:Regardless, no online mode, the multiplayer didn't allow for computer controlled AI, very few tracks, options, etc. Besides, you people freak out as if a 6-7/10 can't be considered fun. It's a good fun little game, but it's still little. That's why it got the score it did.
SantaC said:7.9 Mario Kart
You're wrong. Play a real 80% fps and see how it stacks up. Heck, play Republic Commando and see how it stacks up.dark10x said:No way. Halo 2 had a great campaign that receives far too much hate.
What can I say.Segata Sanshiro said:You and your SEGA Rally.
Glad I'm more or less skipping this generation. Not every game has to be an epic 60 hour plus undertaking.Livin_Lovin said:Regardless, no online mode, the multiplayer didn't allow for computer controlled AI, very few tracks, options, etc. Besides, you people freak out as if a 6-7/10 can't be considered fun. It's a good fun little game, but it's still little. That's why it got the scores it did.
I AM JOHN! said:No, this one's pretty correct, actually.
link?Splatt said:IGN God Hand's review. I almost didn't buy the game because of it. Lesson learned. I'm also glad someone took their time to make a video showing how much IGN was wrong about the game.
meppi said:Glad I'm more or less skipping this generation. Not every game has to be an epic 60 hour plus undertaking.
Gattsu25 said:link?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MyfbtSyX3mcSplatt said:I saw it on youtube. Unfortunately, i can't remember what it was called. Try searching with keywords "God Hand" ; "IGN"
Hmm, just saw the review for the second time ever. It appears as though you are correct.Oblivion said:Actually, you have that backwards. The score was one thing (especially after playing) but the review itself was pretty crap.
Gamer @ Heart said:10.0 Gears of War. 1up.
Welcome to modern journalism. You don't analyze and evaluate stuff, you just relay what you've heard from your contacts, in your own words preferably but not necessarily.GDJustin said:Didn't some GameSpot reviewer totally slam that PC online-only MMOFPS (planetside? not sure...) so then the developer looked at the server logs and saw the reviewer had only played the game like two hours or something similar?
Shane Kim, Microsoft Press Conference, E3 2007:Brakara said:Why single out 1up? It received twenty-six 10/10s from various publications and sites (according to Gamerankings).