|
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
01:25 AM)
|
New 360 motherboard revision in the works for next year (JASPER)
#1
They don't stop do they? as long it's cheaper to make then I guess it doesn't matter :(
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
there is joy in sucking dick
(10-10-2007,
01:27 AM)
|
#2
Originally Posted by neptunes:
Board revisions shouldn't really concern the consumer...but this is the 360 . If you haven't bought it yet, get it now and deal with an RRoD. |
|
(10-10-2007,
01:27 AM)
|
#3
I'll buy a 360 as soon as a model comes out that doesn't red ring.
|
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
01:51 AM)
|
#13
Originally Posted by TJ Spyke:
It's a sign of a price drop. If they don't cut the price when this new motherboard is introduced, you can bash them as you want. |
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
02:08 AM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by jjasper:
It's wonderful how we get this info from Dean. It's good to know that another revision is on the way, but a year off is a long time. I'm looking forward to hearing how reliable the falcons actually turn out to be. |
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
02:35 AM)
|
#31
Originally Posted by 1-D_FTW:
Just ATI now??? Graphics chips are the SLOWEST to take advantage of process. It is just harder in general for them. Let me just ask you... have you heard anything about the PS3 GPU at 65nm yet? |
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
02:44 AM)
|
#33
Originally Posted by 1-D_FTW:
Originally Posted by BboyDubC:
|
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
02:45 AM)
|
#34
Originally Posted by Odysseus:
Indeed, but we can all... http://youtube.com/watch?v=3Oh11mNX9ns |
|
Member
(10-10-2007,
03:06 AM)
|
#36
Quote:
LMAO! They "believe" that it'll be "sufficient"?! These are the same guys that couldn't properly cool the Xbox for the last 2 years, right? Yeah, I'll take their word for it... ![]() |
|
The 'H' stands for hentai.
(10-10-2007,
03:50 AM)
|
#41
Originally Posted by BboyDubC:
Isn't the GPU already at 65 nm for the 40 gig version. After all, the damn thing uses 100 less watts than the original. |
|
Welcome beautful baby girl, Madison Elizabeth, to the horde!
(10-10-2007,
04:04 AM)
|
#43
This doesn't add up, I know that they are late, but over a year late?
http://www.digitimes.com/bits_chips/a20070430PB208.html
Quote:
|
|
(10-10-2007,
04:53 AM)
|
#50
Originally Posted by MWS Natural:
|