• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF

Mistouze
user-friendly man-cashews
(12-11-2007, 09:38 PM)
Mistouze's Avatar
I just did a search and I can't believe what I found out : it seems like nobody has done a Passage thread yet!! OMG so wrong!

So here we go with the page to game site.

The game was made for Kokoromi's Gamma256 event, were designers were asked to design games with one requisite : Using 256 pixels for the games visual, whatever the shape of the "screen" might look like.

Passage is the first game a played of the bunch and I want to share with you all. It's a game about life, there ain't no real goal and you can earn points. I won't spoil the game anymore, just try it and tell us what it make you feel!

For me in the end I felt sooo sad thinking back at everything I did during this short short life. And that feeling when you realize how the game is going to end...like shivers down my spine.
NoirYuki
Member
(12-11-2007, 09:54 PM)
It made me hate life, but that's not exactly a new feeling for me.
Stumpokapow
Currently AFK. Please ask another moderator for help or support.
(12-11-2007, 09:55 PM)
Stumpokapow's Avatar
When people say "games aren't art", they don't mean "games aren't artistic", they mean "games aren't high art".
PepsimanVsJoe
(12-11-2007, 09:56 PM)
PepsimanVsJoe's Avatar
Honestly this is one debate that I wish would die off already.
phil_fish
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:02 PM)
go go kokoromi!

we're very very pleased that passage is getting so much attention.
its a unique piece of work. highly personnal and moving.
it most defenitly IS art.
i think its an important game.
Micromegas
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:03 PM)
The "Are Games Art?" debate needs to die. Toss in conversations about "Games Journalism" and "Games Literacy" as well, pour the gasoline, light the match and walk away.
Gattsu25
Formerly Wakune
(12-11-2007, 10:05 PM)
Gattsu25's Avatar
looks interesting
phil_fish
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:06 PM)
is it possible to talk about the artistic merrits of an artistic game without making it a debate?

passage is a wonderful work of art.
there's no debate to it.
talk about the damned game, not about roger ebert.
as far as im concerned, there is no debate.
Kabuki Waq
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:09 PM)
Kabuki Waq's Avatar
why is that everyone who talks about Art is so damn pretentious?


This isnt art ...that isnt art blah blah blah.

play the game have fun.
NoirYuki
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:13 PM)
There's a reason I hate the term "art" in general, as well as people who call themselves "artists".

Wow, I just hate everything, don't I?
Campster
Do you like my tight white sweater? STOP STARING
(12-11-2007, 10:27 PM)
Campster's Avatar
Phil's right. Shut up about games as art, and shut up complaining about people pushing games as art.

The Passage is a gorgeous. The ambiguous purpose of the treasure chests, the slow change in perspective from only being able to look to the future to only being able to look to the past, the ability to spend that time with someone you care about... it's beautiful.
golduck342
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:34 PM)
golduck342's Avatar
You can skip out on meeting the girl by looking for treasures.
The girl stops you from reaching certain treasures if you do meet her.

whoa...
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(12-11-2007, 10:38 PM)
border's Avatar
There's no benefit to actually having the girl come with you, so the game kind of fails in that aspect.

Other than that, it's terrifyily dull stuff that's more entertaining in concept than execution (which I guess is often a characteristic of high concept art).
Last edited by border; 12-11-2007 at 10:42 PM.
Mr. Lemming
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:40 PM)
Mr. Lemming's Avatar

Originally Posted by border

There's no benefit to actually having the girl come with you, so the game kind of fails in that aspect.

Other than that, it's terrifyily dull stuff that's more entertaining in concept than execution (which I guess is often a characteristic of high concept art).

She doubles your points from exploration.

That said I got about 800 points just holding right down. I didn't even realize you could go south until I read the designer's notes.
phil_fish
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:41 PM)

Originally Posted by border

There's no benefit to actually having the girl come with you, so the game kind of fails in that aspect.

Other than that, it's terrifyily dull stuff that's more entertaining in concept than execution (which I guess is often a characteristic of high concept art).

you get double the points with your spouse.

also, you are dead inside.
Gekkonidae
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:45 PM)
Gekkonidae's Avatar
I remember the Ovationist making a really good post responding to this whole games as art thing: Link
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(12-11-2007, 10:47 PM)
border's Avatar
The game's observations are probably pedestrian by the standards of other artforms -- "The future is hazy.....companions can slow you down....treasures you accumulate mean nothing at death".

If the woman only contributes to score and the score is meaningless, then what exactly does that say about marriage or women? Not what the creator intends, I don't think. To have her only as a multiplier for score shows that she is little more than a status object and a burden.

The woman should probably enhance gameplay as much as she detracts from it (especially considering what a hassle it is to have her around).

Originally Posted by phil_fish

also, you are dead inside.

Well duh.
Mr. Lemming
Member
(12-11-2007, 10:58 PM)
Mr. Lemming's Avatar

Originally Posted by border

The game's observations are probably pedestrian by the standards of other artforms -- "The future is hazy.....companions can slow you down....treasures you accumulate mean nothing at death".

The way the game portrays these ideas is fairly novel. However the game itself is banal outside of the spouse. I'm not really sure what this says about games as art when the most interesting aspect is the concept and graphic presentation and not the gameplay.
Ynos Yrros
Banned
(12-11-2007, 11:05 PM)
What a boring experience.
Mistouze
user-friendly man-cashews
(12-11-2007, 11:39 PM)
Mistouze's Avatar
Please people stop about the game are art or not thing, it was just a damn catchline!!!!

Do yourself a favor and try this out.
Like the hat?
Member
(12-12-2007, 12:09 AM)
Like the hat?'s Avatar
I enjoied it quite a bit. depressed the hell out of me though.
Last edited by Like the hat?; 12-12-2007 at 12:13 AM.
Witchfinder General
punched Wheelchair Mike
(12-12-2007, 12:14 AM)
Witchfinder General's Avatar

Originally Posted by NoirYuki

There's a reason I hate the term "art" in general, as well as people who call themselves "artists".

Wow, I just hate everything, don't I?


Why stop there? Why not have no terms for anything? Or better yet, let's get rid of language alltogether!
Dolphin
Banned
(12-12-2007, 12:24 AM)
I died. This game is hard.

When my girl died before me, I felt overwhelmingly sad. I just walked alone until the end.

I don't even know if I want to play it again, it might cheapen the experience.
Last edited by Dolphin; 12-12-2007 at 12:30 AM.
DDayton
(more a nerd than a geek)
(12-12-2007, 12:55 AM)
DDayton's Avatar
Time to go try it... and if I request a moratorium on the "are games art" thing until 2011, would you folks support me?
Psychotext
Member
(12-12-2007, 12:57 AM)
Psychotext's Avatar

Originally Posted by Dolphin

I don't even know if I want to play it again, it might cheapen the experience.

I feel much the same way.
deepbrown
Member
(12-12-2007, 12:58 AM)
deepbrown's Avatar

Originally Posted by Stumpokapow

When people say "games aren't art", they don't mean "games aren't artistic", they mean "games aren't high art".

they used to say the same about films.
bard
Member
(12-12-2007, 01:03 AM)
bard's Avatar
"Games as art" should die, I agree, but I think what most people are aiming at is this: "can games have a deeper meaning than disposable entertainment"? And obviously the answer is yes.
Bildi
Member
(12-12-2007, 01:12 AM)
Bugger, I downloaded it but it won't go. Stupid work computer.

Originally Posted by NoirYuki

There's a reason I hate the term "art" in general, as well as people who call themselves "artists".

Wow, I just hate everything, don't I?

The old adage "art is in the eye of the beholder" is very true. The creator of something calling it "art" doesn't make it so. The viewer is the one who determines whether something is "art".

The creator of something telling everyone "THIS IS ART DAMMIT!" serves no purpose other than to drive people to the opposite conclusion. The viewer will tend to think "well, the artistic merits of this thing must not be very strong if the creator has to TELL me it is art".

I can see the artistic merit in games, but I make the judgement of whether it is art myself. Others do not have to view them the same way and forcing it on them is pointless.
.dmc
Banned
(12-12-2007, 01:20 AM)

Originally Posted by deepbrown

they used to say the same about films.

Games are still a hell of a long way from their Citizen ****

Originally Posted by bard

"Games as art" should die, I agree, but I think what most people are aiming at is this: "can games have a deeper meaning than disposable entertainment"? And obviously the answer is yes.

The answer is perhaps, if games can stop being disposable entertainment.

EDIT : I'm keen to play Passage, but I'm at work at the moment and it fills the whole bloody screen, not too subtle. Is there any way to make it run in a window (Mac)?
newsguy
Member
(12-12-2007, 01:22 AM)
newsguy's Avatar

Originally Posted by Stumpokapow

When people say "games aren't art", they don't mean "games aren't artistic", they mean "games aren't high art".


They are if you're smokin' a joint.
.dmc
Banned
(12-12-2007, 01:31 AM)

Originally Posted by newsguy

They are if you're smokin' a joint.

Jackson
(12-12-2007, 01:33 AM)
Jackson's Avatar
its interesting... I like it.

I love playing games with outside-the-box premises... so fun!
Pellham
Banned
(12-12-2007, 01:34 AM)

Originally Posted by bard

"Games as art" should die, I agree, but I think what most people are aiming at is this: "can games have a deeper meaning than disposable entertainment"? And obviously the answer is yes.

Actually, obviously the answer is No.
Imperial Hot
Member
(12-12-2007, 01:44 AM)
Imperial Hot's Avatar
It was cool and definitely art, but it wasn't a game.

It was a "hold the right button down" simulator.
Branduil
Member
(12-12-2007, 01:46 AM)
Branduil's Avatar
The gameplay sucks.
Fireblend
No Member
(12-12-2007, 01:55 AM)
Fireblend's Avatar
Err, I definitely get the whole profound message and all, but I didn't really find it that moving or life-changing as everyone seems to think it is, not only here but on most sites as well. Kind of an overreaction... thanks for the link nonetheless.

Anyway, back to Cave Story.
Mamesj
Banned
(12-12-2007, 01:59 AM)

Originally Posted by Kabuki Waq

why is that everyone who talks about Art is so damn pretentious?


Why is it that everyone who talks about people who talk about art, but don't enjoy them talking about art, have to throw out the adjective "pretentious"?
Mistouze
user-friendly man-cashews
(12-12-2007, 02:01 AM)
Mistouze's Avatar

Originally Posted by snack

It was cool and definitely art, but it wasn't a game.

It was a "hold the right button down" simulator.

Huh...You actually can go down.
Brak
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:03 AM)
Beautiful. The music really hit me too, especially when my wife died.

I love the field of view and how it evolves over the course of your `life`.
buckfutter
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:05 AM)
buckfutter's Avatar
Any thread in Gaming Discussion which happens to contain the word art in the title is put in a pretty damn precarious position. All we need now is for Sapiens to show up with his "no lol" routine and we're finished.

I can't try out the game yet, got to wait until I get home, but it certainly sounds like an interesting little experiment. Which is probably what I should be working on, rather than big, vague, ambitious design docs that I've got no chance in hell of ever implementing.
Hellsing321
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:08 AM)
Hellsing321's Avatar
It's an interesting idea and makes a good statement, but as a game it really fails. There is nothing interesting to do besides keep walking and if your going to make a statement about life with a game, there should probably be some form of interacting with NPCs.
Last edited by Hellsing321; 12-12-2007 at 02:13 AM.
MGrant
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:10 AM)
MGrant's Avatar
Painfully trite and boring, though I did like the part where the character goes back in time after finally being freed from the shackles of marriage.

Who's to say that's not the story?
madara
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:12 AM)
madara's Avatar

Originally Posted by Stumpokapow

When people say "games aren't art", they don't mean "games aren't artistic", they mean "games aren't high art".

Thank popularity of fps and gta's.
sc0la
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:40 AM)
sc0la's Avatar

Originally Posted by madara

Thank popularity of fps and gta's.

but gta is closer to art than a lot of other games are :lol
lyre
Currently trolling
in this thread.
(12-12-2007, 02:42 AM)
Just got to about 800 points, lost interest and deleted it.

1: The game is boring.
2: Games are not art.
3: Since this topic has been done to death, bury it already.
4: The game sucks.
5: I would ask for my 5 minutes back but since I played this 'game' with my toes while I was actually focusing on making my new characters not suck in Etrian Odyssey (which has more emotional impact than this game btw), you're off the hook for now.
6: Buy Etrian Odyssey you assholes!
Guled
Member
(12-12-2007, 02:44 AM)
Its a really good game, but I think it would have had more of an impact if I didn't get it spoiled.
tino
Banned
(12-12-2007, 02:47 AM)
tino's Avatar
They are just old fags. By the time the gaming generation are old enough to run newspaper and magazine editor-in-chiefs, we will see games treated as art.

YOU HEAR ME ROGER EBERT? YOUR OLD FAG!!
Campster
Do you like my tight white sweater? STOP STARING
(12-12-2007, 02:48 AM)
Campster's Avatar

Originally Posted by lyre

Just got to about 800 points, lost interest and deleted it.

1: The game is boring.
2: Games are not art.
3: Since this topic has been done to death, bury it already.
4: The game sucks.
5: I would ask for my 5 minutes back but since I played this 'game' with my toes while I was actually focusing on making my new characters not suck in Etrian Odyssey (which has more emotional impact than this game btw), you're off the hook for now.
6: Buy Etrian Odyssey you assholes!

See, I was trying to be civil, but you had to invoke fighting words.

Your post is 33% opinion, 33% undefended blanket statement, and 33% baseless vitriol that makes you come off more sad than hip and more desperate than insightful.
Ether_Snake
安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
(12-12-2007, 02:51 AM)
Ether_Snake's Avatar
Am I the only one who just walked forward, walked, walked, walked, walked, and then just suddenly died of age? WTF are you supposed to do?
echoshifting
(12-12-2007, 02:53 AM)
echoshifting's Avatar
Funny, I think this perfectly illustrates why games can't be art (according to Ebert's definition of art at least). If this is 'games as art,' but we had to remove all interesting forms of interaction with it to elevate it to art, then what the hell is the point?

Thread Tools