|
|
(12-21-2007,
07:38 PM)
|
#20
Performance tweaks ?
|
|
Member
(12-21-2007,
07:46 PM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by stuminus3:
I never expected any of the older games to get rumble via patches. |
|
DAN F'N PATRICK
(12-21-2007,
07:52 PM)
|
#28
Originally Posted by stuminus3:
Oh wow.. these devs don't have to go back and add this functionality to games they already shipped, Sony is finally correcting this blunder and I for one am happy with the way they're handling it. It's a good thing, stop spinning it to be a bad one. God I'm really starting to hate anti-PS3 trolls. |
|
Member
(12-21-2007,
09:40 PM)
|
#41
now this MAY be a placebo effect, or who knows, but i dont remember some of these fights animating so smoothly. Engine Rendered cutscenes still produce their share of tearing but fighting these 3 hammer guys and archers shooting at me all at once is going on without a frame hitch.
|
|
Member
(12-21-2007,
09:56 PM)
|
#43
Originally Posted by B-Ri:
Probably the same, GAF posters love to change your memory about performance. Many complain about games they have not played or just exaggerate issues until opinion becomes truth. I can't recall any problems with performance, the game played fine from beginning to end. Now for the "xxx mission was 15 fps!" replies... |
|
Member
(12-21-2007,
10:13 PM)
|
#44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sho Nuff:
![]() |
|
Member
(12-21-2007,
10:44 PM)
|
#50
Originally Posted by Shorty:
.... anyway, to reply to another post, i think warhawk rumbles stronger then HS. |