|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Gaming | Online | O-T |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Shane Kim's pre-cum
shall drench unbelievers (06-08-2008,
07:51 PM)
|
Official Wkd. Box Office June 6–8, '08 - 'Panda' messes with 'Zohan'...
#1
1.
2. 3. 4. 5.![]() rottenwatch box office: 84% Kung Fu Panda 37% You Don't Mess with the Zohan 78% Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull 53% Sex and the City: The Movie 42% The Strangers ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 83% Mongol metacritic box office: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *click pic(s) for source(s)*
Quote:
![]() *click pic for fuill list/source* i think DreamWorks Animation has FINALLY produced a flick with Shrek-like franchise potential in 'Kung Fu Panda'. Everything else up to this point has just been dire. Also, I hear it's not only best not to "mess with the Zohan" but avoid it like the plague altogether! |
|
(06-08-2008,
07:54 PM)
|
#2
As someone who DESPISES Dreamworks and every 3D movie they've made...
Kung Fu Pand was REALLY REALLY FUCKING GOOD. I'm definitely going to see it more than once. |
|
(06-08-2008,
08:01 PM)
|
#9
Originally Posted by Anasui Kishibe:
I saw it in December and have been telling people to go see it since then. No one listened! |
|
Jamarcus Russell'd
(06-08-2008,
08:01 PM)
|
#10
Originally Posted by artredis1980:
? All 3 Matrix movies made a killing and V for Vendetta (Although they didn't direct) made ~$140,000,000. |
|
GAF Cruiserweight Champ
(06-08-2008,
08:02 PM)
|
#11
Poor Mongol? Its in 5 theaters in all of America
![]() Its making nearly $27,000 per theater! |
|
(06-08-2008,
08:05 PM)
|
#15
Indiana Jones is at 78% on RT? That POS? Holy shit you can't trust anyone nowadays.
|
|
Americans out of Mexico! The Border Tax Equity Act
(06-08-2008,
08:11 PM)
|
#17
Originally Posted by BobFromPikeCreek:
All that hummus costs a lot of money. Anyway, the movie wasn't as bad as I expected it to be. Maybe it's because I kept my expectations low. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
08:13 PM)
|
#19
Originally Posted by DMczaf:
Yeah, people certainly don't seem to be reading the entire thing. Doesn't open in our local indie theater until June 27th. Planning on seeing it. |
|
(06-08-2008,
08:17 PM)
|
#24
Originally Posted by BobFromPikeCreek:
Sandler plus NYC shoot adds up. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
08:18 PM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by fistfulofmetal:
Major studies are so filled with bureaucracy and middlemen that they are completely incapable of making a movie on the cheap. Also, marketing is sometimes rolled into the 'budget' category, which I'm not sure if this is the case here. |
|
DAN F'N PATRICK
(06-08-2008,
08:32 PM)
|
#26
Originally Posted by BobFromPikeCreek:
As for NYC shooting, recently they've made it relatively cheap to shoot there, so much so that Ugly Betty has moved ALL their shit from LA to NY to shoot there. |
|
Listen to my posts
in REAL TIME AUDIO (06-08-2008,
08:41 PM)
|
#28
Do you guys expect Panda to outdo Wall-E in total box office?
|
|
Pierre, il est le brun poisson
(06-08-2008,
09:04 PM)
|
#32
Originally Posted by ComputerNerd:
I wouldn't be surprised if it's closer than most people think. Kung Fu Panda seems like it would have a bit broader audience than Wall-E does. |
|
Sperm Receptacle
(06-08-2008,
09:23 PM)
|
#33
Originally Posted by DrForester:
That's the feeling I've been getting lately too. The Kung Fu Panda trailers have always got a positive reaction from the audience when I've seen them, while the Wall-E trailers leave the audience in dead silence. I get the impression that the audience doesn't like the fact that all Wall-E can say is his name, which is in line with most adults thinking Pokemon are retarded since that's all they can say as well. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
09:39 PM)
|
#34
Originally Posted by Snaku:
Except that Wall-E isn't a retarded little yellow...thing. Hes a cool fucking robot man. |
|
Sperm Receptacle
(06-08-2008,
09:47 PM)
|
#36
Originally Posted by Concept17:
There have been plenty of cool fucking robots in films past...that talked. While I agree that Wall-E is awesome, and I can't wait to see it, I can't deny that audiences just aren't seeming to connect with the character. I think the no talking thing is what's doing it. |
|
Shane Kim's pre-cum
shall drench unbelievers (06-08-2008,
10:37 PM)
|
#38
even if Wall-E were the stupidest fucking 3D animated movie Pixar's ever produced, it'd coast on hype alone, at this point- at least for the first week. This isn't a Ratatouille scenario we're looking at. Almost EVERYONE knows about Wall-E and wants to see it, which is actually kind of ridiculous. Women want to see it because they find Wall-E "adorable" and guys want to see it because it's about robots, while kids want to see it because it's a Disney cartoon, and the general public wants to see it because of Pixar's track record. Wall-E is made of WIN, basically.
i'll be shocked if it doesn't outpace Kung Fu Panda by a sizable margin, in the end. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
10:40 PM)
|
#39
Originally Posted by xaosslug:
From the exclusive scenes I saw at the NY Comic Con, if people dont see and Love this movie, then they are dead inside or have no taste in movies whatsoever and should not be allowed inside a theater. |
|
how are you, B!TCH? How is your day going, B!ITCH?
(06-08-2008,
11:43 PM)
|
#44
Originally Posted by bud:
That movie was an abortion gone wrong and the "message" was shallow. It wasn't particularly funny or meaningful when it was clear that it was attempting to do both. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
11:45 PM)
|
#45
Originally Posted by bud:
Agreed. Got me all surprisingly sad and depressed by the second half of the movie. |
|
how are you, B!TCH? How is your day going, B!ITCH?
(06-08-2008,
11:53 PM)
|
#48
Originally Posted by bud:
It was a bad movie, bud. It was a bad movie. You know what Adam Sandler movie was good but doesn't get enough praise? Spanglish. |
|
Member
(06-08-2008,
11:55 PM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by typhonsentra:
if you're trying to imply you DIDN'T waste money and time on any Sandler after Wedding singer, you deserve to be forced to watch cheap '70 German porn for at least one week |