|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Gaming | Online | O-T |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:15 PM)
|
Sony's Tretton: 'Disappointed' In Multiplatform FFXIII Through MS' 'Currying Favor'
#1
Some plaintive noises arriving from a new Jack Tretton roundtable:
http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/new...hp?story=19448
Quote:
Last edited by h0l211 : 07-16-2008 at 08:22 PM. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:17 PM)
|
#2
Quote:
Only worthwhile thing he said I think. |
|
rising from soot, not ashes
(07-16-2008,
08:18 PM)
|
#3
I would think it would be a good idea to curry favor from third parties.
Originally Posted by Y2Kev:
It also looks like we're moving towards a one-experience future. We'll have multiple consoles, but they'll all act basically the same. |
|
Xbox 360's Hillary Clinton
(07-16-2008,
08:19 PM)
|
#8
Sony doesn't have the money to do so like MS does.
Well, I guess they do, but it isn't money well spent. Unless you are in the position like MS is where you have a ton of money and no marketshare. You spend the money in an attempt to get more, but they are getting their ass beat by the wii anyway. I would rather have Sony spend their money on first party games. FF13 is still coming to PS3. BTW, this empowers my one console future desire more and more. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:20 PM)
|
#10
Quote:
|
|
Danish
(07-16-2008,
08:21 PM)
|
#12
Quote:
Pot. Kettle. Black. |
|
aka andydumi
(07-16-2008,
08:22 PM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by crowphoenix:
I think looking forward the only exclusives will be internal ones (which is the way Sony is focusing on). If I were them I would rather spend money on an internal product (more control), than write a check to a third party for theirs. |
|
Never gonna give you up! Never gonna let you down! Never gonna run around and desert you!
(07-16-2008,
08:25 PM)
|
#32
Originally Posted by crowphoenix:
They may act the same, but only one of them was capable of thought. ![]() |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:26 PM)
|
#34
when all is said and done i'm really happy sony has chosen to invest its dollars in internal development studios. This way they're breeding platform exclusive specialists, able to tap into ps3's rescources, and build an developerfriendly independent enviroment where technology, creativity and talent can be reallocated, applied and bred into new franchises. I think we can already see the payoff with the second flood of sony titles on display at E3, and things are only getting better.
|
|
Banned
(07-16-2008,
08:26 PM)
|
#35
Originally Posted by 3rdman:
Not at all. Matter of fact Sega was really humble about it.
Originally Posted by Rapping Granny:
Fixed Last edited by Rottweiler : 07-16-2008 at 08:29 PM. |
|
Danish
(07-16-2008,
08:26 PM)
|
#37
Originally Posted by B_Rik_Schitthaus:
Um ... I think you missed the point. Granny said Microsoft was buying its way to the top, but it's not on the top of anything in this industry. Well, except online play. And Netflix. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:26 PM)
|
#38
Quote:
|
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:27 PM)
|
#40
Originally Posted by puebla:
It sure does. Now Sony, see what happens? You gotta lick third party asses to get good things sometimes. As the curent market it, did you really expected SE to go exclusive for a title that is costing them a lot of money? Selling software is what drives them, or some millions under the table and the market has shown that the 360 sells software really well, so this was a logical business decision.
Quote:
Gears? |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:27 PM)
|
#41
I'm all for spending money on internal development. Because of high cost, no third parties will stay forever exclusive. You spend millions on timed exclusivity and still don't even own single art screen.
Timed exclusivity is worth its price only if it is more than a year long like Bioshock. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:28 PM)
|
#42
Originally Posted by Hellraizer:
![]() |
|
Never buying another games console. Ever.
(07-16-2008,
08:28 PM)
|
#44
Disappointing? No. When you have two "high end" consoles out on the market that are practically the exact same thing, it's not "disappointing", it's "to be expected".
At this point it's disappointing when a third party game hits the HD systems and it's not multiplatform. Actually not disappointing. It's nonsensical. EDIT: Actually having two identical HD systems is what's nonsensical. Sony and Microsoft should have sex or something. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:29 PM)
|
#46
Originally Posted by Rapping Granny:
Of what? This is their latest attempt to try and move some consoles in Japan. Sorry, it's certainly not a game changer, for the same reason MGS4 wasn't - the people who will buy this game already have whatever console they will buy it on. |
|
Member
(07-16-2008,
08:29 PM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by nib95:
We did OK in the NES days. There was no real competition. And the nice thing was I didn't miss out on any games. I got my Metal gear, my Final Fantasy, my Metroid and Mario Brothers all on the same system. |