|
Member
(12-22-2010, 03:08 PM)
|
#901
Okay, so I'm coming here for a little preamp help. The Emotiva USP-1 that kevm3 was talking about looks great. It has everything I need, mainly phono input and high pass and sub out for monitor and sub additions later on. However, at the moment I'd need a preamp with two full range RCA outputs for my bookshelf speakers and headphone amp. Any one have any suggestions within the same price range and with the same features?
Or A DAC similar in price and performance to the DACMagic that has two RCA outputs. |
|
|
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 03:43 PM)
|
#903
My passive combo is working very well, so I'm putting up the USP-1 for sale for $235 shipped if any of you gaffers are interested (CONUS only). I just want to let one of you get an opportunity with it before I put it up for sale on the emotiva forums.
I can't find the manual, but it comes with the remote and is in great condition except for a scratch on the top near the back. DAC must have scratched it. If you can live with a scratch and a manual, then nearly half off of the new price. Front view http://i53.************/9umdll.jpg Scratch under normal lighting http://i54.************/23jhh60.jpg Scratch illuminated under direct lamplight http://i56.************/2rgbyua.jpg |
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 03:46 PM)
|
#905
Originally Posted by nitewulf:
Originally Posted by kevm3:
|
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 03:50 PM)
|
#907
Originally Posted by nitewulf:
|
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 03:52 PM)
|
#908
Originally Posted by Alucrid:
|
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 04:12 PM)
|
#910
Originally Posted by Alucrid:
** Update. I've found the manual and put it in the box.
Last edited by kevm3; 12-22-2010 at 04:51 PM.
|
|
Member
(12-22-2010, 05:03 PM)
|
#911
Originally Posted by kevm3:
|
|
Member
(12-23-2010, 04:09 AM)
|
#912
Hey Ya'll.
I decided to get the Audioenergy A5s and the 3.5mm audio in jack at the top seems broken. It works but when i wobble the plug the audio cuts in and out, is this a design flaw or is the top panel of my unit broked? BTW these speakers sound really,really, ultra shit with the pc onboard soundcard. I had to dust off an old creative card to get the thing to sound acceptable. |
|
Member
(12-23-2010, 02:20 PM)
|
#913
Originally Posted by CurlySaysX:
|
|
Rambunctious Rogue
yet Regrets his Tag (12-23-2010, 02:26 PM)
|
#914
Originally Posted by CurlySaysX:
|
|
Member
(12-23-2010, 02:31 PM)
|
#915
Would you suggest buying these:
http://www.thomann.de/gb/behringer_m...utsprecher.htm and an active subwoofer in terms of audio quality? |
|
testicles on a cold fall morning
(12-23-2010, 02:46 PM)
|
#916
Originally Posted by CurlySaysX:
also, what internal soundchip do you have? the latest realtek HD integrated chips are pretty damn good, and i find it nearly impossible to spot any difference between that and my USB DAC - http://www.headfonia.com/audinst-hud-mx1-dac/ |
|
Member
(12-23-2010, 07:16 PM)
|
#917
Originally Posted by Metroid:
|
|
Member
(12-24-2010, 02:58 PM)
|
#918
Onkyo is having a decent sale on their refurb units (1 year warranty): http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthr...=#post35660231
The TX-8255 is a damn fine stereo amp/receiver and at $90 it’s a steal. |
|
Member
(12-24-2010, 10:12 PM)
|
#919
I am really considering these. Do they seem reasonable?
Creative Labs GigaWorks T3 price:$199.99 http://www.amazon.com/Creative-Labs-.../dp/B001S10DDO |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 03:29 AM)
|
#920
Originally Posted by drifter444:
|
|
(12-25-2010, 05:21 AM)
|
#922
I absolutely love the look of these:
![]() Shame they're not sold any more it looks like. :( |
|
If you stop seeing my posts, you can probably guess why
(12-25-2010, 05:32 AM)
|
#923
Looks like they're still for sell, unless those are the mkii's.
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 01:59 PM)
|
#924
Originally Posted by Meier:
I just got a pair for christmas. I'm using my Zero DAC to A/B them against my Klipsch Pro Media 2.1 (line out to the Swans, heapdohne out to the Klipsch. I can switch between the two with the press of a button.). They absolutely wipe the floor with the Klipsch. It's not even a contest. They're big though. At least 4x the size of the Klipsch.
Last edited by WHOAguitarninja; 12-25-2010 at 02:12 PM.
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 02:20 PM)
|
#925
This amp was just what was needed. At one point I was thinking about selling the speakers for something else, but now I'm to the point where I'm afraid to change them because I like the sound so much. System synergy is a must. This combo has me just lost in the performances. Every cent well spent.
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 02:41 PM)
|
#926
Originally Posted by scorcho:
I live in OZ so I think the cost of shipping back for replacement isn't really that convenient. I plugged in one of those L plug extension cords that come with Sony Earphones and when wobbled it the sound didn't cut out at all, so I think i'll just use that for now. My internal sound card is a VIA Vinyl HD Audio. It was fine with my previous speakers which had SPDIF input, but it makes the A5s sound like cheap generic speakers. I like Bass and when I turned up the bass it distorted but the bass it produce was not powerful at all, and the highs made my ears hurt. The creative card produces good, clean , powerful bass and trebles are not as harsh. |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 02:43 PM)
|
#927
Originally Posted by kevm3:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 02:51 PM)
|
#928
Originally Posted by Bitmap Frogs:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 02:59 PM)
|
#929
Originally Posted by kevm3:
Class A is an audiophile myth =/ |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 03:11 PM)
|
#930
Originally Posted by Bitmap Frogs:
Class A is merely a type of amp design http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electro...lifier#Class_A Amplifying devices operating in Class A conduct over the whole of the input cycle such that the output signal is an exact scaled-up replica of the input with no clipping. A Class A amplifier (or operational amplifier) is distinguished by the output stage (and perhaps the driver) device(s) being biased into Class A; even Class AB and B amplifiers normally have early stages operating in Class A. In what blind listening test was this? What speakers were used? |
|
testicles on a cold fall morning
(12-25-2010, 03:27 PM)
|
#931
Originally Posted by CurlySaysX:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 04:17 PM)
|
#932
Originally Posted by kevm3:
Details: Amp 1 -------- Previo MARK LEVINSON Nº 38S + Etapa MARK LEVINSON Nº 333 Amp 2 -------- YAMAHA RX-V 540 (AV básico) Lector CD-------------- Sony SACD XA3000ES (Premio EISA 2004) Cables 1 -------------- MIT Mi-330 PLUS Terminator + Audioquest Emerald Cables 2 -------------- Rojo/negro estándar SpeKers ----------------- Revel Performa F30 + Cables audiófilos |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 04:48 PM)
|
#933
I got speakers for xmas, but they won't fit where I need them to fit, so I'm looking for a different set...
Are these decent speakers http://www.amazon.com/M-Audio-Studio...3298642&sr=8-3 And is would this cable be what I need to hook them up? http://www.amazon.com/Hosa-CPR-203-A...ef=pd_sim_MI_6 Fairly certain about the cable, but better safe than sorry :lol These will be for listening to records on my turntable. |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 05:03 PM)
|
#934
Originally Posted by WEGGLES:
You would need this cable. Single 1/4 out which will go into your computer and plug each 1/4 end into those speakers. |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 05:19 PM)
|
#935
Originally Posted by kevm3:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 05:25 PM)
|
#936
Originally Posted by Bitmap Frogs:
I have an HK3490 stereo receiver I was using only the amplifier section prior to installing the Plinius and it sounds nothing like the Plinius. |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 05:31 PM)
|
#937
Originally Posted by WEGGLES:
|
|
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(12-25-2010, 06:00 PM)
|
#939
Originally Posted by WHOAguitarninja:
but I really don't have any PC audio equipment to speak of beyond some really nice headphones and amps powerful enough to drive them (and by that I mean, nothing that I expect will support serious desktop audio, but might?). my desktop amp is this guy ![]() Fiio E9. pretty basic stuff. what kind of stuff should I be looking for to compliment a set of speakers like in WHO's link? could I even get away with the E9 amp with a nice preamp? or do these speakers even need a pre-amp? |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 06:04 PM)
|
#940
Originally Posted by kevm3:
The speakers I'm looking to get don't have RCA in. So that's why I was asking about the cables I posted. They should be fine though.
Originally Posted by ngower:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 07:24 PM)
|
#941
Originally Posted by Dreams-Visions:
|
|
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(12-25-2010, 07:43 PM)
|
#942
Originally Posted by Alucrid:
and yes, I'd just be using my E7/E9 combo. for starters. I don't know if I'd want to go "all in" for my PC rig, as it wouldn't be my primary listening location. I'd rather put that money into my main home audio setup in my living room where I'd do most of that kind of listening. so something that's really good, but not necessarily "Godlike" is fine for around the desktop in the den. I'll probably order the M200MKII's next week. |
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 07:46 PM)
|
#943
Originally Posted by Dreams-Visions:
|
|
Member
(12-25-2010, 08:28 PM)
|
#945
Originally Posted by kevm3:
The brain plays tricks on us. |
|
Member
(12-26-2010, 05:14 AM)
|
#946
Originally Posted by Bitmap Frogs:
theoretically, an amp amplifies signals, true, but there are many designs. it would be presumptuous to think they would all sound the same. even in my electronics courses, perfect sinewave input signals were distorted to hell at the output of the feedback amps we used to build on bread boards. if you listened to it, it'd probably sound a lot closer to the input signal than it looked. yet, a better circuit yielding a closer approximation of the input signal would possibly sound even closer. basic circuit elements have +- tolerances to deal with, hence the closer to tolerance a device is made, ie, the more precise it is in regards to its ratings, the more expensive it is. because its harder to make it. that doesn't mean these materials have to be hand made, and cost 1000s...a good quality amp could probably very well be manufactured under $100 using off the shelf, but measured and carefully selected elements. now better is a different issue, a lot of the times better signal isnt necessarily an accurate amplification. what sounds pleasing is subjective, and at the end of the day you guys have no talking points, even if you keep forcing the idea about psychoacoustics. what is the point if at the end of the day, the listener is more pleased with the new setup? what does it matter? now, better power chords, usb cables and so forth, yes i would call BS on that. the power is being drawn from the outlet, through a passive conductor, and there should be no reason at all for a more expensive cable to make the power AC signal nicer for your equipment, by default its passive. if its doing anything to the signal, then its not a good cable to begin with. |
|
Member
(12-26-2010, 03:14 PM)
|
#947
Originally Posted by nitewulf:
With matched outputs and no visuals to indicate what's the piece of gear working people can't distinguish between a priced AAAA+ Mark Levinson and a run of the mill Yamaha receiver. The only logical conclusion is that electronics design has progressed to the point we can make gear that sounds better than what our ears can hear for cheap. The same blind listening tests suggest as well that audiophile cabling is nothing but a scam. |
|
Member
(12-26-2010, 03:51 PM)
|
#949
Originally Posted by Bitmap Frogs:
Back to back comparison done between my two amplifiers (Yamaha A-S700 and Vincent SV-236MK) showed me that the Vincent produced a crisper, cleaner, clearer sound. Tested the same sets of songs on each at the same volume. |
|
Member
(12-26-2010, 08:50 PM)
|
#950
Originally Posted by thesoapster:
By the way, the discussion is only about electronics. Loudspeakers do have noticeable differences. These are the kind of setups the guys at Matrix HiFi use for their blind listening tests: http://matrixhifi.com/contenedor_ppec.htm |