|
Member
(05-30-2012, 12:45 AM)
|
#7951
He is Canadian. I don't know if that has anything to do with it but as soon as I heard the word layoot instead of layout i knew.
Looks like a nice big ass car. edit: holy crap that touch screen is laggy
Last edited by TylerD; 05-30-2012 at 12:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(05-30-2012, 01:24 AM)
|
#7952
There are certainly arguments to be made for power giving you a measure of safety but "I can do 100mph in less time" isn't one of them, and I very much doubt there are any emergency actions you can take that are safer at 500hp than at 300hp (unless your car weighs 4000+lbs). |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 01:30 AM)
|
#7953
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 01:43 AM)
|
#7954
There are cars with decent power and that handles well too... no power doesn't mean = nimble/handles well/more responsive... I actually believe that sports cars with alot of HP actually have better suspensions than less sporty cars. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 02:09 AM)
|
#7955
Yeah. It'll be kind of embarrassing if the virtual version included in the iPad app runs better than the actual version in the car.
|
|
...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
(05-30-2012, 04:04 AM)
|
#7956
As someone else mentioned, 5.0 Mustangs with the track pack will perform identically to an E92 M3 on a track - it's not just about the muscle and the power. There is a whole ton of sophistication in suspension geometry that balances out all of that power - and we're talking about a car that has a live-rear axle of all things outdated. Hell, Corvettes are some of the best handling cars in the world and they're still on leaf springs. You can have an absolutely razor sharp machine with a ton of power. So I agree, I'm getting tired of people saying "but it handles well!" Yes, it does...but other cars (in the same price bracket, new or used) handle just as well with more power to boot without overwhelming you with power, not in my opinion at least. Plus, the BRZ's steering is slowly being criticized for being too loose/soft and artificial, because it's electric, as opposed to a standard pump power steering. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 05:02 AM)
|
#7957
More power is usually a crutch for a heavy car, these days. And yes, you can find powerful cars that handle well, but often either the ride is crap. And you're right that lack of power doesn't mean anything other than a lack of power. This is why we have the Corolla and Civic and Smart Car. HOWEVER, I dare you to find one Euro luxosedan that can corner anywhere near as well as an Exige. Power will only benefit you on the straights, it's largely wasted/unused in the turns. Great handling cars that don't have gobs of horsepower: -Mazda Protege MP3 -Mazdaspeed MX-5 -S2000 -Toyota MR2 -Ford Focus SVT -Mini Cooper S -and now the Toyobaru as well (just to name a few) |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 05:18 AM)
|
#7958
that's kinda contradicting...you say heavy power car handles well, but often either ride like crap, but then you mention the Exige? have you driven an Exige? that car rides pretty dayam rough on the public road. also why would you compare that to a Euro Luxosedan? there different purpose car... might as well compare it to an Ariel atom.
Last edited by shinshoryuken; 05-30-2012 at 08:42 AM.
|
|
...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
(05-30-2012, 03:43 PM)
|
#7959
So the equation is actually: power+handling=great ride. Also, power is wasted on turns? Dude, what are you talking about? Going through a turn faster, but primarily being able to come out of the apex faster is the entire point of power not being wasted with a capable chassis. You make it seem like people just mash the throttle through a corner or something and just drift or spin out? If you take two of the same cars, one with 200HP and one with 300HP, and they both go into a turn at the same speed, the 300HP car will not only pull through that turn faster, but also pull out of it much faster, as well. How exactly that's wasted power is beyond me. The same applies to more powerful supercars that have ludicrous suspensions, tires, and torque-vectoring differentials that are applying all of that power evenly between each wheel or all 4 wheels. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(05-30-2012, 04:03 PM)
|
#7960
Automotive GAF.
So, my Civic got nailed by a Taxi. Gonna get it fixed, and using my medical settlement for buy a new city car. Is this unmanly?
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(05-30-2012, 04:10 PM)
|
#7961
Full disclosure: I have no idea if it's any good, but it doesn't strike me as a chick's car at all. |
|
...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
(05-30-2012, 04:11 PM)
|
#7962
Pretty cool car in black/red. Girly in white/red. My GF's neighbor has one in white/red...it does sound surprisingly nice.
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 04:12 PM)
|
#7963
I don't think so. Especially in that color scheme. I like the Fiat, the vehicle's got a lot of charm. I rode in the back of a regular Fiat 500 at the Atlanta Auto Show while my dad drove it (not exactly comfortable). I kind of wish I'd driven it as well, but I wanted to drive the Chrysler 300 SRT before they closed down for the day. I'll bet the Abarth is a blast to drive.
|
|
Aggressively Stupid
(05-30-2012, 04:13 PM)
|
#7964
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(05-30-2012, 04:26 PM)
|
#7965
|
|
Hail to the Chef
(05-30-2012, 04:30 PM)
|
#7966
didn't follow the thread on a regular basis, which one did you get (AT/MT)? how tall does it feel? OT for the "bigger is better" crowd: having driven a Mk6 GTI on the praised Autobahn as my daily drive for 72.000 kilometers now, there were only three (!) instances or opportunities to redline the car for more than a few seconds. Most of the time, it feels like I am overpowered in traffic, the GTI feels like just a little above idle speed. Even in a country without a general speed limit. The GT 86 appeals to me because from what I read, you won't HAVE to go fast to have fun with it. And it looks just beautiful. Just my opinion. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 04:39 PM)
|
#7967
And yes, it'll ride like crap on a road, but so do many of these recent exotics and high-power cars whose suspensions are tuned to tackled the Nurburgring rather than real roads.
Where is all your power now? It's in the grass with you, if you try to use it all while cornering. There's a point where a car is underpowered in a turn, yes, but past the point where it can squeeze all of that out, it's only useful in a straight line.
No one is saying power is bad to have, the argument is that lack of power does not make a car crap or un-fun.
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 04:47 PM)
|
#7968
Onkel C I have driven many cars in my life. I am 35. I have never experienced anything like this before. I can't even put it into words. I feel like I am glued to the road. This is not going to make sense to anyone, but when I was 16 and sat in an RX-7 for the first time, I had a feeling that I never ever had before. I got that same feeling when I drove this car. I am not talking about speed. I am talking about what my mind and body was feeling. Simply amazing. There is a real reason almost every review out there has praised it as something so special. It really is special. I am in Fkn love.
Last edited by Liquidsnake; 05-30-2012 at 05:01 PM.
|
|
Hail to the Chef
(05-30-2012, 05:13 PM)
|
#7970
odd request: could you take a pic standing next to the car? i'm 6.2, would be a nice reference. I still can't picture out how low the FR-S is. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 05:17 PM)
|
#7971
There was a company that did the proper crash testing in order to get the car legalized for street use in the US. One of the owners got shady and fudged a lot of the paper work to get more cars legal. Word got out and the feds cracked down and the hunt was on. There's a reason why bonded/DOT skylines fetch a LOT more money then the grey market versions. You can roll the dice and have a shop sneak one in and register it in a State that doesn't give a crap, but you're taking a big gamble with your money. That being said, I know people rolling like that with grey market cars (S15, R33, R34, Older Evos) but they live in States that don't care/ use loop holes (VA, FL, Etc). I've been following the issue since I'm a big Skyline guy and plan to own a R33 or R34 in a few years (I live in Canada BTW). I have a few friends who own RHD imports, and I'm planning to import a S15 Silvia next year. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 05:30 PM)
|
#7972
Your argument is null then... Why mention an extreme example of a great handling car, but crap on high powered car saying it ride like crap? Have you driven some of the car you're crapping about? Ex. The z06 shit will out handle all the cars you listed, PLUS its pretty dayam civilize on public road. A porches 911 gt2 rs is actually a better ride than the exige.... |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 06:00 PM)
|
#7973
Because they're in love with the idea of making a cheap car super awesome through kickin rad mods to the point that any purpose built fast car sucks no matter what it is. It's the same reason people put wings on Honda Civics. I mean, for fuck's sake, we're arguing whether the 370Z is a boat. Take any car that isn't a Lotus to these guys and its automatically a Dodge Challenger.
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(05-30-2012, 07:02 PM)
|
#7975
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 07:06 PM)
|
#7976
A lighter car with less power is ALWAYS a better base to build a funkar on.
Last edited by N-Bomb; 05-30-2012 at 07:09 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 07:22 PM)
|
#7977
most of the time when a car has more power in stock form it has more weight to handle the power, and thats what we are talking about. Being connected to the road and feeling everything is very important. too many people just want huge amounts of power in heavy cars that go in a straight line, being disconnected from it all. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 07:23 PM)
|
#7978
Nah I say lets bash the Accord.
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 08:17 PM)
|
#7980
I love how 200 hp is suddenly nothing.. The HP inflation of modern cars has distorted people's perceptions.
I also love how people compare how people try to compare a car to a car that costs $10k more new. The BRZ/FRS is a shitload of fun for the money. What is wrong with designing and engineering a car not to have certain numbers on a spec sheet, but instead just making something fun to drive? |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 08:49 PM)
|
#7982
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 09:46 PM)
|
#7986
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 10:11 PM)
|
#7987
Your basically saying that mod a lighter car and it will be more fun? what about wheel base? chassis rigidity? suspension dynamics? ex. a light car like the old AE86 cant even handle that much power without being unstable to drive. This is true for most light weight cars. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 10:13 PM)
|
#7988
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 10:37 PM)
|
#7989
A shit car can be REALLY fun/exciting, but the bigger a car is, the less fun it is because it's missing that feeling of connectedness or danger. That damping inherent in heavier/bigger/more refined cars is what kills the feeling of fun, often. When ads tout 'direct'ness, precision, feedback, etc... they're saying that the engineers tried to capture the essence of what 'driving excitement' (RIP Pontiac) is. Wheelbase is less important than grip/progressive loss of, chassis rigidity is a good thing to a point - and that point was passed before the turn of the century. At this point, all that chassis bracing is just making the car heavier. You don't want a mushy, squirelly piece of shit, but at the same time, why not just seam weld everything and build in a roll cage? The engineering of most cars today should allow them to handle twice their power (on the low end) without many problems.
But to bring a heavier car down, you need to remove things. Once you get past easy things like a lightweight battery, spare tire, etc... where do you go? Carbon fiber body parts get expensive real fast, tossing out seats (obvious)... light weight wheels can be expensive. Then there's the fact that bigger cars more often than not have a higher center of gravity, leading to more body roll, or more stiffness in the suspension to counter that. And once you've lightened the car? You may need to tune your suspension so that it doesn't get bouncy. Meanwhile, you're still probabably not more than 300-400 lbs lighter than when you started, but you've given up on many of the reasons you may have bought that car for. |
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 11:09 PM)
|
#7990
All your saying are theory.....why can't you give an actual car as example? what is this magical light car that is so fun? I've driven a whole range of cars from rust buckets to exotics...rice rockets to race prep. The thing is each car has a different characteristic. You cannot just generally say "light cars are more fun" "heavy car ride like crap" "just add more power" I've modded cars myself and it feels good tuning to your liking. But that doesn't mean it will be actually be better than a purpose built sports car from the factory. You can't turn a crappy car to something else. I've seen so many example of poorly modded cars were they drive like rattle cans....
Last edited by shinshoryuken; 05-30-2012 at 11:22 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-30-2012, 11:27 PM)
|
#7994
coming form a someone that says something like...
Last edited by shinshoryuken; 05-30-2012 at 11:34 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-31-2012, 12:23 AM)
|
#7995
Yeah, as if it wasn't painfully obvious that he was being sarcastic to show the absurdity of being concerned with 0-120 mph acceleration performance...
This thread. :(
Last edited by TylerD; 05-31-2012 at 01:01 AM.
|
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(05-31-2012, 12:25 AM)
|
#7996
Ha ha you got me, taking what was quite clearly a joke and considering it a serious reflection of my personality.
Edit: To the point, though, I find it seriously odd that you have to ask someone else for an example of a small, lightweight and fun car. |
|
Member
(05-31-2012, 12:26 AM)
|
#7997
How about a Cooper S? Slightly bigger, stronger crash ratings, faster, similar or better MPG. |
|
is not a grungy orphan raised by wolves
(05-31-2012, 12:30 AM)
|
#7998
Maybe this is silly but I'm honestly tired of the Cooper. We've had, basically, the same little car since 2001 and it's getting a little stale. Okay yes, I love 911s and that makes me a hypocrite but I just don't feel like the Cooper's styling had enough going for it to keep it fresh on its own. The Fiat 500 has that new kick that the Cooper just doesn't.
|
|
Member
(05-31-2012, 12:40 AM)
|
#7999
its also absurd to be so concern so much about handling even though the majority won't even take it to 50% of its limit on the public road. why can't there be a balance of power and handling?
Light car = more fun! and just add more power to light car = more fun slap this to that = more fun! powerful fast car = crap ride.. too heavy! so I'm wondering what magical car is he talking about...
Last edited by shinshoryuken; 05-31-2012 at 12:56 AM.
|