|
DAFFY DEUS EGGS
(08-07-2009, 08:01 AM)
|
#101
Originally Posted by DECK'ARD:
He fits the profile of a sociopath so well that we should probably be thankful his life's work is screwing other creatives rather than, say, abducting hitchhikers. |
|
|
|
(08-07-2009, 08:35 AM)
|
#103
Cripes, that guy again.
What a mess. |
|
(08-07-2009, 08:54 AM)
|
#104
Check out the comments:
http://www.gamerbeef.com/article2474.html http://twitter.com/carltonholder Email to one of the concerned members:
Quote:
Last edited by Graphics Horse; 08-07-2009 at 09:01 AM.
|
|
Sailor Stevenson
(08-07-2009, 11:45 PM)
|
#105
This was the e-mail the IGDA sent out today:
Quote:
|
|
Banned
(08-08-2009, 12:03 AM)
|
#107
Originally Posted by jstevenson:
|
|
listen to the madman
(08-08-2009, 12:05 AM)
|
#108
typical petty bureaucracy crap
I can't wait for the report from the special subcommittee report on committee procedures commissioned by the standing committee on organization by-law enforcement! After that, they can select members for a recommendation subcommittee to discuss the viability of coming up with a recommendation report to discuss the question of whether or not the IGDA should address the stated issue. Dear White People in Suits, Go to a pub, order some burgers, put down the Roberts Rules of Order, do your jobs. Right now you look like a university chess club trying to figure out what to do about the treasurer kissing the member-at-large at the club bowling social. The amount of effort that goes into writing constitutions and bylaws and guidelines for mid-tier organizations far exceeds the amount of effort it'd take to come to an ad hoc consensus every time an actual controversy arises. Just pitiful. |
|
Member
(08-08-2009, 01:16 AM)
|
#116
Can we not just do away with this whole IGDA thing, Tim Langdell included? It doesn't sound like they're a particularly useful or effective organisation. They can't (or won't) protect their own members and even seem unable to call a meeting. Just what is the point of such a thing?
|