|
how do I slip unnoticed out of a gloryhole booth?
(08-20-2009, 09:34 PM)
|
#902
Damn, I missed nine pages of outrage countered by faux-outrage regarding something I am entirely removed from? :(
OUTRAGEOUS! Anyway... If people think it's reason enough to not purchase the game, then by all means do not, otherwise don't let the morality of others reign over your own. The Gaygamer.net article seems to have said it all. Unless this thread, along it's nine pages, veered off into the 'should we enjoy culture from bigots even when there is no bigotry in their art' debate, to which is I say: Sure, why not. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:35 PM)
|
#903
Originally Posted by Segata Sanshiro:
The thing is, it's much easier to pass on a videogame than to pass on cheapo electronics, affordable branded apparel or meat burgers. Boycotting Shadow Complex to hurt somewhat OSC income is like a small donation to a church or charity - you'll barely miss the spare change and it'll pump your ego because it's for "a good cause". |
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:35 PM)
|
#905
Originally Posted by elrechazao:
Also pointing out facts is "demonizing" now? I'll make a note of that. I was referring specifically to people who continue to ignore the distinction being made between Card and your garden variety homophobe. Card is a powerful, organizer dedicated to stripping people of civil rights. But everyone wants to gloss over that and say OMG boycott over someone's beliefs. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:36 PM)
|
#906
While I certainly have no problem with anyone choosing not to spend their money on Shadow Complex, for me it's about picking your battles. A very small portion of the money I spent on Shadow Complex will go to Orson Scott Card, an even smaller portion will ever be used for a cause which I find objectionable.
Unless I'm directly contributing to something, I try not to think about this sort of thing too much. Yes, it's willful ignorance, but if I worried about where every dollar I spend ends up, I'd go crazy. I try to give money directly to causes I support and hope that everything else works itself out. If I find myself feeling bad about it later on, I'll just contribute to a pro-gay marriage cause. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:37 PM)
|
#907
Originally Posted by Big-E:
Secondly, it's a thought experiment to see how deep your convictions are. If Card owned your electric grid, would you buy electricity from him? You don't need it to live, but you need it to live your lifestyle. No...it's not the same. It's not the same at all...but that wasn't even the point of the person asking the question. I don't even care about your answer because it wasn't my question. Third, I said I wasn't advocating it was a valid analogy. Reread my post. Just pointing out a flaw in your logic regarding it.
Last edited by Askani; 08-20-2009 at 09:41 PM.
|
|
(08-20-2009, 09:37 PM)
|
#908
Originally Posted by NullPointer:
But let's keep this grounded in reality. This will never extend beyond a few internet forums :) |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:38 PM)
|
#910
Originally Posted by Mercury Fred:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:38 PM)
|
#912
Originally Posted by ShockingAlberto:
Honestly at this point I don't care anymore - I am checking out of this thread. I have already bought Shadow Complex and would recommend it to anyone looking for a good XBL game. Down with boycotts! |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:40 PM)
|
#917
Originally Posted by Coins:
It'd be like boycotting the next Splinter Cell the day Tom Clancy does something really bad. That's why I think it's kind of pointless to boycott Shadow Complex for those reasons, but to each his own. I wasn't going to buy the game anyway. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:41 PM)
|
#918
Originally Posted by Burger:
There's GLAAD, which does much the same thing, but not focused just on school harassment. They work with churches to raise awareness that homosexuality isn't evil, run outreach programs for gay and straight people alike, and have care-centers that don't really run for free. There's also PFLAG (Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), which has been sued by evangelicals like Pat Robertson in an effort to keep their campaigns of gay acceptance of family members off the air. Those legal bills aren't exactly free. It's not charity in the sense you know it, but the money goes to good causes. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:45 PM)
|
#920
Originally Posted by DKnight:
I am sure there are really nice Production Assistants on Rush Limbaugh's show, but I would be totally okay with his show faltering without my money. Not that it would ever happen, but at least I know he's not getting it. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:45 PM)
|
#921
Originally Posted by Askani:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:47 PM)
|
#922
Originally Posted by Timber:
But yeah, I'll try to stay as grounded as I can, and only say that there is almost nothing I believe more in these days than voting with your wallet. |
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:48 PM)
|
#923
The issue of separating the art from the artist (as someone else termed it "the Heidegger dilemma") is an issue I have always struggled with. Ultimately I do think a work should be judged on its own terms, but I also think that is a bit of a cop out because you can't deny the material reality that you ARE supporting this person's work and they are benefiting from it (unless they are no longer living, that is the real "out" I see).
In this case, it is a more indirect link on one hand because Card is one step removed from the game, but the fact that Chair has an established relationship with him really makes me concerned and pushes the matter further than I am personally comfortable with. This is clearly not just a coincidental association where Chair thought Card had a idea that would make a good game. This is the SECOND game they have made based on his ideologically charged novels. Given that, I wish I had known all this before I purchased the game. There are far more good games than I will ever have the time to purchase and play and if I can get buy without supporting a company that likes to buddy up with radical homophobes, then all the better. I certainly won't be purchasing a "Shadow Complex 2" or any other game that Chair makes as long as they maintain this relationship. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:49 PM)
|
#924
Quote:
Isn't it just about homosexual marriage ? I live in France so I don't know how it is in the states, but being aginst homosexual marriage is not being against other people rights. It would be more apropriate to say that you boycott because it contributes to stop new laws you want for your country. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:49 PM)
|
#925
Originally Posted by Me_Marcadet:
Here we go |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:49 PM)
|
#926
Originally Posted by ShockingAlberto:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:50 PM)
|
#927
Originally Posted by Big-E:
1. We never specified where in the world you would be living, the only stipulation was that it is possible to live without electricity. Doesn't have to be in a city (and likely would not). And you would probably want to live somewhere warmer than Canada. Needless to say there are people in the world who currently live without electricity. 2. My point was not even meant to be an analogy and I myself admitted it was horribly uneven if taken as one. I simply asked the question to make a point, that there comes a time when you are no longer willing to give something up for a cause. And on top of that that boycotting Shadow Complex is so insignificant it is not even worth mentioning. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:51 PM)
|
#928
Originally Posted by Me_Marcadet:
|
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:51 PM)
|
#929
Originally Posted by Zenith:
|
|
Look!
A crack addict with a tag! (08-20-2009, 09:52 PM)
|
#931
Originally Posted by ShockingAlberto:
This on the other hand, is a very easy call for me. |
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:52 PM)
|
#932
Originally Posted by Me_Marcadet:
So Prop 8 was an effort not to block, but to remove rights that had been legally granted by the state. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:53 PM)
|
#933
Originally Posted by Me_Marcadet:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:55 PM)
|
#934
Originally Posted by elrechazao:
Quote:
Quote:
Everything seems to check out to me. I'm not a huge fan of Yoichi Wada being incompetent, and I don't like Nomura using so many belts, but as far as I know, none of the developers of new games I've purchased have expressly given money to anti-gay rights movements. Though sometimes I do wonder about Nintendo, Tingle can't be a coincidence. |
|
Put your snobby liquids into my mouth!
(08-20-2009, 09:55 PM)
|
#935
Originally Posted by ShockingAlberto:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:56 PM)
|
#936
Originally Posted by Timber:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:56 PM)
|
#937
Originally Posted by kodt:
2) Ya that is wonderful. OSC not getting his share of 15 dollars may not hurt him too much but it certainly doesn't help his case so I fail to see how it is not even worth mentioning. |
|
(08-20-2009, 09:56 PM)
|
#938
Originally Posted by Zenith:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:56 PM)
|
#939
Originally Posted by Big-E:
Originally Posted by Big-E:
Last edited by Askani; 08-20-2009 at 10:00 PM.
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:56 PM)
|
#941
Originally Posted by ShockingAlberto:
I'm against homosexual marriage but I'm for homosexual parenting for example.
Quote:
|
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:58 PM)
|
#942
Originally Posted by DKnight:
The concepts of these games clearly doesn't require a literary association but the designers sought out an associating with Card. Twice. |
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:58 PM)
|
#943
Originally Posted by Me_Marcadet:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 09:59 PM)
|
#944
Originally Posted by truly101:
|
|
Banned
(08-20-2009, 09:59 PM)
|
#945
Originally Posted by elrechazao:
And I only buy videogames developed by Bill Maher. It limits my selection, but you know, I just couldn't stand supporting someone who has different views than my own. |
|
Canadians burned my passport
(08-20-2009, 10:00 PM)
|
#946
Originally Posted by Coins:
Originally Posted by elrechazao:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 10:00 PM)
|
#947
Originally Posted by Askani:
|
|
Member
(08-20-2009, 10:01 PM)
|
#950
Originally Posted by Asmodai:
Bill Maher? At least pick someone funny :lol |