|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Gaming | Online | O-T |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
11:21 AM)
|
Swedish LEVEL #43 magazine - Tekken 6, Brütal Legend, Forza, Borderlands
#1
![]() Tekken 6 - 9, 9 Brütal Legend - 8, 10 Aion - 7 Forza Motorsport 3 - 8 Machinarium - 9 Ratchet & Clank: A Crack in Time - 7 Football Manager 2010 - 9 Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising - 7 Kingdom Hearts: 358/2 Days - 7 Borderlands - 6, 7 Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story - 9 Super KO Boxing 2 - 6 You, Me & The Cubes - 6 Champions Online - 6 Gridrunner Revolution - 8 NHL 2K10 - 5 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Smash Up - 5 Lucidity - 6 Dungeon Hunter - 6 Drift Mania - 8 Last edited by Tenkai Star : 10-30-2009 at 11:28 AM. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
11:26 AM)
|
#4
Originally Posted by Seiken:
I would give it a 7 or 8. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
12:11 PM)
|
#14
Great indeed, like the time when Level/SuperPlay journalist Thomas Wiborgh gushed all over Halo 2 for like 4 pages giving it an OUTSTANDING best of the best 10/10.
.. and we all know how that game ended up (saved by it's multiplayer, faaar from flawless). |
|
Banned
(10-29-2009,
12:14 PM)
|
#15
Originally Posted by Lord Phol:
Success! Wtf, what are you, 10? |
|
(10-29-2009,
12:16 PM)
|
#16
Ratchet seems to be getting lots of 7s :(
I know I'll still love it but I can't help but feel Insomniac were better when they only concentrated on one game at a time. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
12:20 PM)
|
#17
Originally Posted by Seiken:
One of many, which after awhile makes you take anything they put out with a grain of salt. I used to be a subsriber to both SuperPlay and Level. Atm I'm not big fan of what either of those magazines are offering, which ofc is my opnion and you are entitled to disagree. Let's just leave it at that. I'm 21, don't see how that is relevant though. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
12:24 PM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by pswii60:
They are, while the programmers are working on resistance, the designers are working on ratchet and vice versa. The main problem with Ratchet is that it hardly does anything new. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
12:57 PM)
|
#20
Enjoying BL muchly, although it does have a few pretty silly design flaws. Nordic countries are pretty hugely into their metal so the 10 is not that surprising...10s are thrown about too often these days...this game certainly doesn't deserve that kind of score
|
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
01:07 PM)
|
#21
Originally Posted by nelsonroyale:
But not everyone rates games with mathematic equasions. If the review guy had a blast with the game (whatever the reasons might be) a few flaws in the game won't necessarily have to reduce the number from "10". please don't type the word "consistent" in this thread. I might get mad. |
|
Member
(10-29-2009,
01:51 PM)
|
#22
Originally Posted by zoukka:
In my opinion if your reviewscore is not backed up by the reviewtext you have done something wrong. |
|
Member
(10-30-2009,
11:16 AM)
|
#23
Originally Posted by Mithos:
|
|
Member
(10-30-2009,
11:23 AM)
|
#25
Originally Posted by Mithos:
That didn't have anything to do with my post? Of course you need to back up the score with the text. My point was that many reviewers don't think of games as "100%" and then start decreasing that number as flaws start to show up. |
|
Member
(10-30-2009,
11:29 AM)
|
#28
Originally Posted by WretchedTruman:
|
|
Member
(10-30-2009,
12:18 PM)
|
#29
Originally Posted by zoukka:
In a way it did have something to do with what you wrote. Even if a reviewer have a blast playing a game, if the review text say the games have flaws, it SHOULD be reflected in the review score (but many do not do this). |
|
Member
(10-30-2009,
12:28 PM)
|
#30
Originally Posted by Mithos:
No it SHOULD NOT if the magazines scoring system doesn't require it. |