|
Member
(03-10-2010, 09:04 AM)
|
#951
Originally Posted by neorej:
Originally Posted by neorej:
Anyway, sorry if this turned into systems wars. I originally came here to give my input on what I understand of the technical merits of each aproach. I'm really hyped for Arc, like i showed in the Kz3 Arc thread. Night.
Last edited by Lonely1; 03-10-2010 at 09:08 AM.
|
|
|
|
If this poster agrees with you, you're doing something very wrong.
(03-10-2010, 10:50 AM)
|
#952
so when is the official stuff coming out?
p.s. can you wii-comparing guys find another thread to argue? i dont feel like reading billion "just a tech demo" posts to find out if there was anything new here... maybe mods should start thread such as that forza3 vs gt5 so everyone would keep shit out of other threads? |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 11:00 AM)
|
#953
Originally Posted by Sidewinder:
I agree with the PR / marketing statement.
Last edited by yurinka; 03-10-2010 at 11:05 AM.
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 11:07 AM)
|
#954
Lonely1, dude, calm down. This is neat tech - exactly what Sony does best and exactly what Nintendo were expecting from them, much sooner than 'late 2010'.
You should be welcoming of Arc. It lets all of us fully explore the accuracy issue of motion controllers, what's going to rock, and what's going to suck. It's not a threat to Wii, it's four years too late for that. It's a threat to whatever Nintendo have next. It doesn't matter if MotionPlus can or can not do what Arc does in that tech demo*, because no developers are using Wii M+ for that purpose, so it's irrelevant. If GAF finally gets the light-sabre game it's been crying for since 2006 on Arc, Arc will be worth it. *Motion plus can, technically, do that demo excluding the camera, but Nintendo have always had a policy of showing off in-game usage. And then the wrist-strap gets in the way anyway, and if you have up-scale lag on an HD TV M+ can seem slow... the Sony solution is much more geared towards guys who are geared towards hi-tech gear. Just relax. For those five years that SCE have been focused on Arc, Nintendo's been focused on something else cool to entertain us all with. |
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(03-10-2010, 11:17 AM)
|
#955
Looking at that GIF... you could take those eyetoy play fighting games to a ridiculous level.
With eyetoy, the fighting games were side-on 2D affairs. You'd be on one side of the screen, turned to the side against the TV, the computer opponent on the other. It just mapped your motion in 2D to hits and punches against whatever foe was on the other side of the screen. With this, though, you could make the enemy totally 3D, and you could give the player a weapon to wield...and now you can track that in 3D space with precision, so you can attack that opponent in 3D with as much precision and detail as you had in that E3 third person sword demo. You could potentially even walk around your opponent and so on - the AI is not really tracking 'you' - it's tracking the sword but it looks like it's seeing you moving around etc. It would be neat to see that evolution. Yes, of course, mapping this control into a non-augmented reality game is great too, but I think a lot of people would find it neat to have a AR sword fighting game with this level of fidelity and precision in 3D space. |
|
If this poster agrees with you, you're doing something very wrong.
(03-10-2010, 11:24 AM)
|
#958
Originally Posted by Bad_Boy:
|
|
time to take my meds
(03-10-2010, 11:27 AM)
|
#959
Originally Posted by Suzzopher:
I'm grateful for nintendo's attempt at motion control, because who knows if sony would of actually gone through with so much support for Dr. Marks. :)
Originally Posted by spwolf:
|
|
GAF's Bob Woodward
(03-10-2010, 11:43 AM)
|
#962
Time to put your detective hats on, kids.
SCEI just yesterday trademarked two things, in Europe: 1) PlayStation Move
Quote:
[IMG]http://i42.************/mcf2w8.jpg[/IMG] Under the same classification. Now...the word mark says one thing, but the non-word mark says another IMO :lol Sony throwing out confusion? I think the non-word mark could be the logo for Arc. It looks like a A, and it hints at the motion of the sphere as if in timelapse, the trace of the light on a timelapse video. Hmmm.
Last edited by gofreak; 03-10-2010 at 11:45 AM.
Reason: small correction...scei trademarked them in europe, not scee
|
|
Banned
(03-10-2010, 11:55 AM)
|
#965
Liking the looks of it, I hope with a vast pool of 1st party studios Sony can really pump some nice software through this.
Accuracy is something I like, and so is feedback, aka your old fashioned rumble and being able to hold something. However until the software pops up purchase is still on the wall, interest however is definitely in the court. |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 11:58 AM)
|
#966
Originally Posted by spwolf:
Originally Posted by gofreak:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 12:55 PM)
|
#970
Originally Posted by DMeisterJ:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 12:55 PM)
|
#971
Originally Posted by gofreak:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:00 PM)
|
#972
Originally Posted by Lonely1:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:04 PM)
|
#974
Originally Posted by expy:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:14 PM)
|
#975
Originally Posted by dose:
words like ... laptop, slim, move, arcade, love, smile, fastfood, frirmware, etc. did. my parents know the meaning of these kinds of words - "arc" to them is like japanese... and to many europeans to... well to everyone who is not good in english its one thing to create a new word, like bravia or zune... but calling it "arc" is just sounding very harsh, almost rude and if you dont know its meaning - its terrible... germans calling it "arc" would be a PR nightmare for sony germany... edit: i love the name, but i see no point in it calling it arc in europe... people dont know what it means ... and all that is left is a fucked up sounding word
Last edited by sankt-Antonio; 03-10-2010 at 01:18 PM.
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:24 PM)
|
#978
Originally Posted by sankt-Antonio:
|
|
Banned
(03-10-2010, 01:28 PM)
|
#979
Originally Posted by sankt-Antonio:
Try not to use your limited vocab and world knowledge as an assurance of something in the future. |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:44 PM)
|
#981
Originally Posted by Hero:
You fixed nothing. In fact, you are attempting to rewrite history. Unfortunately, the facts aren't in your favor. His original quote, before you "fixed" it, was perfectly fine:
Originally Posted by Trailblaster:
It serves no purpose in this thread. Worse still, you are stating things as fact in your "fixed" quote that simply aren't true at all. Want proof? OK... Here's what Dr. Richard Marks, the man in charge of Sony's R&D efforts for the past decade, said about this technology to Gamasutra waaaaaay back in 2004, which was more than a year before the Revolution/Wii plan was revealed, and more than two years before it made one red cent for Nintendo:
Originally Posted by Gamasutra:
Well that flies right in the face of your claim, doesn't it? Obviously, Sony didn't think a 3D motion control solution was a gimmick even well before the Revolution/Wii was revealed or making any money. The man in charge of this project clearly said it would be someday be one of the most important innovations in games way back in 2004. Sony invested around a decade in R&D time and R&D dollars developing this kind of thing. If you think Sony is just a "Johnny-come-lately" here, or hasn't been quite serious about developing a 3D motion controller, you haven't been paying attention. That's your problem, not Sony's. Sony's interest and R&D in this area has been well-known for years and years. They've done tons of very public tech demos over many, many years talking about this tech, and they've spent tons of money over the last decade developing this thing. |
|
time to take my meds
(03-10-2010, 01:50 PM)
|
#982
Originally Posted by gofreak:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 01:59 PM)
|
#983
Originally Posted by Bad_Boy:
|
|
time to take my meds
(03-10-2010, 02:03 PM)
|
#984
Originally Posted by mrwilt:
though I like the sound of ARC better, in the bane of augmented reality controller is going to sound cooler imho when marketing this device.
Originally Posted by Suzzopher:
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 02:12 PM)
|
#985
Originally Posted by SecretBonusPoint:
wii is "we" in funny, thats perfectly fine - arc is crap (for PR), you will see that that name is not marketable in most of eu and it will make more sence calling it ps move or whatever ... just try to imagine a german voice speaking the word "ARrrrC" out loud... yes it sounds that bad... : do not forget, i like the name very much - its just not a name for a mass product ... edit: and you cant read? i never said i dont know the meaning of the word... + you have to reach the people that only speak rudimentary english
Last edited by sankt-Antonio; 03-10-2010 at 02:26 PM.
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 02:23 PM)
|
#988
Originally Posted by IrrelevantNotch:
man, PS3 fanatics are going to be HILARIOUS. i can't wait for E3. aside from ARC looking fuck awesome i've noticed a lot of shitting on the Wii lately. smh. good times though. |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 02:24 PM)
|
#989
Originally Posted by jaypah:
Edit: The Wii gets it rather consistently from what I see and often unfairly but that is a side effect of not making bald space marines more common on the device. |
|
Girl got arse pubes.
(03-10-2010, 02:25 PM)
|
#991
Originally Posted by sankt-Antonio:
if you choose one word for an international product, you are always going to run the chance of colliding with another languages interpretation of the word |
|
(03-10-2010, 02:30 PM)
|
#992
Originally Posted by neorej:
I have yet to say a single negative thing about the Sony arc in this topic, only to dispel comments that this couldn't be done on the motion+ which most of you, despite having not have used AT ALL, seem to believe. You so easily believe the videos of other people using the Arc yet actual testimony from others using the motion+ is completely brushed aside |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 02:30 PM)
|
#993
Originally Posted by dogmaan:
but this somehow proves my point that names in different countries can lead to some "problems" .... bigger and smaller ones... not only interpretation, but the sound of spelling it is what makes me think it might be bad - who knows, could be that i am the only one who thinks that way ... forget it and move on then?
Last edited by sankt-Antonio; 03-10-2010 at 02:35 PM.
|
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 03:05 PM)
|
#996
Originally Posted by BruceWayneIII:
so wouldnt that make it less precise when aiming?not talking about the other capabilities. I've read that the wiimote had an infrared camera with high resolution. Or did i read wrong?... i think it was that oriental guy who made those awsome demos using the wiimote...he said something about the wiimote having a hi-res(1024x780 or something) infrared camera |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 03:07 PM)
|
#998
Originally Posted by sankt-Antonio:
People doesn't need to know the meaning of the word; Arc is just another name... |
|
Member
(03-10-2010, 03:12 PM)
|
#1000
Originally Posted by Maxrunner:
I should note that I don't know what camera resolution SONY's been using in their demos. Might as well have been the 60 Hz option. |