lexi
Member
(03-02-2010, 08:39 PM)

lexi's Avatar
#651

Originally Posted by shidoshi:
Okay, so, right after I read the latest updating in this thread, I was going to send you a PM to say that I suppose it's about time I'm listed in the OP. *laughs* So yeah, go ahead and add me.
Okay, you're in!

Quote:
Also, might we want to have a very brief FAQ in the OP as well? Maybe cover stuff like "what words are offensive" and stuff like that?
Yes, excellent idea, I will add that today; if anybody, transgaf or otherwise has any thing they'd like submitted, please PM me. BTW, Jess, when you read this, could you do up a FAQ graphic? :P
water_wendi
Water is not wet!
(03-02-2010, 08:40 PM)

water_wendi's Avatar
#652

Originally Posted by lexi:
Ooh, Congratulations on the username change!
Thanks! Lots of name changes around here lately, eh? :lol

And i have to say.. finding any alternative to the MTV player for that episode is crazy. MTV has their stuff on lockdown pretty hard. ill keep looking since its bound to be posted on another streaming site.. or at least parts of it.

edit: another great graphic Android18a :)
Last edited by water_wendi; 03-02-2010 at 09:23 PM.
Android18a
Member
(03-02-2010, 09:17 PM)

Android18a's Avatar
#653

:D
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 09:25 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#654

Originally Posted by water_wendi:
Thanks! Lots of name changes around here lately, eh? :lol

And i have to say.. finding any alternative to the MTV player for that episode is crazy. MTV has their stuff on lockdown pretty hard. ill keep looking since its bound to be posted on another streaming site.. or at least parts of it.
Haha, grats on the name change Wendi. It's getting to the point where I am overly confused, even when I know someone's avatar.

Oh, and today's movie viewing will include "Southern Comfort" and "Boy I Am," and if I have time "Let Me Die a Woman."
shidoshi
GameFan alumnus
ganguro preacher
(03-02-2010, 09:28 PM)

shidoshi's Avatar
#655

Originally Posted by lexi:
Okay, you're in!
We really need at least one FTM on that list, don't we? *laughs*
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 09:34 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#656

Originally Posted by shidoshi:
We really need at least one FTM on that list, don't we? *laughs*
It's sort of the same issue gay gaf has with lesbians. There just aren't that many girls on gaming forums, even those transitioning. Of course if all of you hotties stay around the number will be bumped up significantly.
Android18a
Member
(03-02-2010, 10:01 PM)

Android18a's Avatar
#657

Ultimately, we need to get recruiting <3
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 10:04 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#658

Originally Posted by Android18a:
:D
Hm, I might have to get you to make graphics for me in the future. All of them have been stellar so far.

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
It's sort of the same issue gay gaf has with lesbians. There just aren't that many girls on gaming forums, even those transitioning. Of course if all of you hotties stay around the number will be bumped up significantly.
G man slides in for the kill. I love it. So smooth in the delivery.

Originally Posted by Android18a:
Ultimately, we need to get recruiting <3
Apparently I'll be joining in a page or two. Keep your eyes peeled. :lol :lol

Originally Posted by border:
It represents a problem because soldiers live in pretty close quarters, showering and sleeping together. Nobody likes the feel of being leered at, which is why men and women don't bunk together. Homosexuality screws things up because it makes people uncomfortable to think they're being eyed up in intimate situations.

Maybe in a few hundred years it will be like Starship Troopers and all our troops can shower naked together, but if that's possible it's certainly a long way off.
I have a problem with this line of thought: because someone might like the same sex, what makes you think you're even attractive to them? There are already rapes going on in the military (male to female), even if we do separate the genders. How does it make sense to think that someone would suddenly want to rape the same sex if you knew they were homosexual or TG?

It's just outright fear, the kind that isn't even rational. Fear of the unknown. They aren't like you, so they must be bad. This policy has gutted our military. We've lost key translators, key field operators, and key commanders because of this policy, and that has made us 50% weaker than we could be. It's a policy that has no bearing on reality (there would be no greater or less rapes or leers if you knew someone was homosexual or TG), and one that does far more harm than it ever has done good.
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 10:28 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#659

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
Hm, I might have to get you to make graphics for me in the future. All of them have been stellar so far.
Seconded, it never ceases to amaze me how much talent there is on GAF.

Quote:
G man slides in for the kill. I love it. So smooth in the delivery.
*blush* Thanks!
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 10:30 PM)

border's Avatar
#660

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
I have a problem with this line of thought: because someone might like the same sex, what makes you think you're even attractive to them?
So why not just let men and women shower and live together? Just because they're heterosexuals doesn't mean they'll be attracted to each other! I've said nothing of rape, just that people don't like the sense that they're being judged and leered at......it does not let you build trust or form a cohesive team. If you can understand why a woman might not want to be naked around a bunch of guys, it's probably not that hard to understand why a man might not want to be naked around homosexual males. I guess you could call it homophobic -- does that make the woman heterophobic, though?

Once you get past that level of enlisted grunts it probably makes less sense to make a distinction on sexuality. For officers out of basic training I'm not sure if there's much point to it, other than being a homosexual probably has a detrimental effect on your ability to command respect.
RiskyChris
Banned
(03-02-2010, 10:33 PM)
#661

Originally Posted by border:
If you can understand why a woman might not want to be naked around a bunch of guys, it's probably not that hard to understand why a man might not want to be naked around homosexual males. I guess you could call it homophobic -- does that make the woman heterophobic, though?
Uh a straight guy seeing a straight girl in the shower is different than a gay guy seeing a straight guy in the shower.
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 10:34 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#662

Originally Posted by border:
So why not just let men and women shower and live together? Just because they're heterosexuals doesn't mean they'll be attracted to each other! I've said nothing of rape, just that people don't like the sense that they're being judged and leered at......it does not let you build trust or form a cohesive team. If you can understand why a woman might not want to be naked around a bunch of guys, it's probably not that hard to understand why a man might not want to be naked around homosexual males. I guess you could call it homophobic -- does that make the woman heterophobic, though?

Once you get past that level of enlisted grunts it probably makes less sense to make a distinction on sexuality. For officers out of basic training I'm not sure if there's much point to it, other than being a homosexual probably has a detrimental effect on your ability to command respect.
The whole "attracted people showering together!" line of argument would make a LOT more sense if most high schools didn't make people shower after gym class. :lol :lol For that matter I wasn't give a choice of roommate assignments in College either, there were 4 of us sharing a room, the other 3 were all straight.
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 10:38 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#663

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
The whole "attracted people showering together!" line of argument would make a LOT more sense if most high schools didn't make people shower after gym class. :lol :lol For that matter I wasn't give a choice of roommate assignments in College either, there were 4 of us sharing a room, the other 3 were all straight.
You really wanted to sneak into their bed, didn't you? You stared at their junk all the time, right?
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 10:39 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#664

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
You really wanted to sneak into their bed, didn't you? You stared at their junk all the time, right?
Of course. Many was the night when they woke up with my love juice spraying them in the face :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
lexi
Member
(03-02-2010, 10:42 PM)

lexi's Avatar
#665

Just wanted to chime in that Gaborn is *very* skilled with words. He can and will make you blush.
Last edited by lexi; 03-02-2010 at 10:51 PM.
BocoDragon
Banned
(03-02-2010, 10:43 PM)

BocoDragon's Avatar
#666

This thread is already consciousness raising... I never really thought about trans people before this. Someone on facebook posted something about an encounter with a trans-woman yesterday as an obvious "joke".. and I cringed. I don't think I would have noticed that before reading this thread.

Its just nativity... At one point, people thought you could make a joke along the lines of "gay people exist lol", while now most of us would find that suggestion offensive. Now its time for transgendered awareness to make that leap...
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 10:45 PM)

border's Avatar
#667

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
The whole "attracted people showering together!" line of argument would make a LOT more sense if most high schools didn't make people shower after gym class. :lol :lol For that matter I wasn't give a choice of roommate assignments in College either, there were 4 of us sharing a room, the other 3 were all straight.
The difference of course being that high school is not the US Military, and you and your gym mates aren't going to have to be in close quarters for 24 hours a day with the eventual goal of becoming a company of highly effective soldiers.

Originally Posted by RiskyChris:
Uh a straight guy seeing a straight girl in the shower is different than a gay guy seeing a straight guy in the shower.
How so?
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 10:45 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#668

Originally Posted by lexi:
Just wanted to chime in that Gaborn is •very• skilled with words. He can and will make you blush.
Thanks baby girl, but maybe I just like watching cute blondes with their all over blush... :D

Border - the difference between a straight girl and a gay guy being in close quarters is that gay guys generally grow up learning to be discreet and respectful around guys. The LAST thing we want to do is make a straight guy uncomfortable, and in general there's a lot less of the taboo factor with us, it's not like we don't regularly see a penis anyway since we own one ourselves.

Besides, frankly most guys aren't nearly as hot as they think they are, and if they were 99% of the time we're not going to tell you.
RiskyChris
Banned
(03-02-2010, 10:47 PM)
#669

Originally Posted by border:
How so?
It just is, the distinction in showers is pretty arbitrary no matter what arbitrary way you slice it.
Ri'Orius
Member
(03-02-2010, 10:51 PM)

Ri'Orius's Avatar
#670

Originally Posted by border:
The difference of course being that high school is not the US Military, and you and your gym mates aren't going to have to be in close quarters for 24 hours a day with the eventual goal of becoming a company of highly effective soldiers.
A difference, you mean.

Another difference is the fact that high school kids are, y'know, kids, barely trusted with their dad's car. Whereas military men are supposed to be adults, trusted with deadly weapons and missions to use them responsibly.

If a man can't handle knowing that a guy in his company is gay, I'm not sure I like the idea of him running around in Iraq with an assault rifle.

EDIT: Wow, sorry; completely forgot what thread this is in. Sorry for contributing to derail; posting out of reflex, I suppose.

Been meaning to post my support in here, but not sure what else to say. Just one more member of cisgaf sayin' I hope you ladies (and any gentlemen who might be out there as well) find peace, I suppose?
shidoshi
GameFan alumnus
ganguro preacher
(03-02-2010, 10:51 PM)

shidoshi's Avatar
#671

Originally Posted by border:
So why not just let men and women shower and live together? Just because they're heterosexuals doesn't mean they'll be attracted to each other!
You do know that co-ed bathing was extremely common in Japan until the West convinced them that it was "wrong", and that there are still public co-ed baths in Japan to this day, correct?

People who are raised to not believe that co-ed showering is and sort of big deal will, funny enough, grow up to no think of it as any sort of big deal. Is there still some percentage of people that may try something (like rape) due to the situation that is provided? Of course, but that possibility is always going to happen, no matter the time or place. If people are raised to see co-ed activities like that as being nothing but normal and common, after a while that's how people would see it and it wouldn't be such a taboo idea as it is now.
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 10:55 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#672

Originally Posted by border:
So why not just let men and women shower and live together? Just because they're heterosexuals doesn't mean they'll be attracted to each other! I've said nothing of rape, just that people don't like the sense that they're being judged and leered at......it does not let you build trust or form a cohesive team. If you can understand why a woman might not want to be naked around a bunch of guys, it's probably not that hard to understand why a man might not want to be naked around homosexual males. I guess you could call it homophobic -- does that make the woman heterophobic, though?

Once you get past that level of enlisted grunts it probably makes less sense to make a distinction on sexuality. For officers out of basic training I'm not sure if there's much point to it, other than being a homosexual probably has a detrimental effect on your ability to command respect.
It seems as if you're under the assumption that someone who is homosexual wouldn't feel any attraction, if there was any, with DADT in place. Regardless of a policy, that will happen, the same as attraction between males and females. Yet no one questions male and female soldiers hooking up. Someone's sexuality isn't going to change how they perform their duties, and whether you know it or not isn't going to change how they view you. For the record, most homosexuals don't have any interest in hetero men and women. There's a line of respect that they do not cross. It's the same for male and female relationships, unless we'd like to paint a broad brush and say that all men, when rejected, will continuously hit on and try to coerce females into falling for them. We don't, and homosexuality and TG is no different.

Originally Posted by lexi:
Just wanted to chime in that Gaborn is *very* skilled with words. He can and will make you blush.
Oh, yes, I think I'm falling for him already. :lol :lol :lol

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
Border - the difference between a straight girl and a gay guy being in close quarters is that gay guys generally grow up learning to be discreet and respectful around guys. The LAST thing we want to do is make a straight guy uncomfortable, and in general there's a lot less of the taboo factor with us, it's not like we don't regularly see a penis anyway since we own one ourselves.

Besides, frankly most guys aren't nearly as hot as they think they are, and if they were 99% of the time we're not going to tell you.
It's like men have this inflated sense of self. You ever wonder why it takes a hetero male so long to get into a woman's pants unless she's pretty open? Because "They just aren't that into you." If guys were nearly as good looking and charming as they thought, women would be dropping their panties all over the place to jump on the pogo stick. It's just not happening. Hetero men believing that gay men would be all over them should remember that we are the equivalent of women in their eyes. If a gay male wants to get into a hetero man's pants, you either 1) rape him or 2) have to do a long winded courtship that, chances are, will have ZERO pay off. Since sexuality does not equate to your morals, if you are a moral person, you're not going to rape someone. That doesn't change because someone is into their own gender. It's simply not worth it when there is someone who will be into you and into your lifestyle just around the corner.

I have several gay male friends, and while they've complimented me on my looks, they have never been forward, never tried to get into my pants, and never once thought they had a chance. It's not my thing, they know that, and they know they won't get me to change. That's simply the way it is. That doesn't change if we're soldiers, either.
Last edited by Alfarif; 03-02-2010 at 11:07 PM.
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 11:04 PM)

border's Avatar
#673

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
It seems as if you're under the assumption that someone who is homosexual wouldn't feel any attraction, if there was any, with DADT in place.
The policy exists more to keep heterosexuals comfortable than it does to prevent homosexuals from being attracted to mates in their platoon. It's less about preventing fraternization and more about keeping things cohesive.

Quote:
For the record, most homosexuals don't have any interest in hetero men and women. There's a line of respect that they do not cross.
This was a line I've always failed to believe -- that people can just turn their sexuality on and off like that if they know the orientation of the person they are gazing at. I wouldn't coerce or hit on a lesbian, but if I had one in her panties in the bunk across from mine you'd better believe I'd be glimpsing at her out of the corner of my eye.
RiskyChris
Banned
(03-02-2010, 11:05 PM)
#674

Originally Posted by border:
This was a line I've always failed to believe -- that people can just turn their sexuality on and off like that if they know the orientation of the person they are gazing at. I wouldn't coerce or hit on a lesbian, but if I had one in her panties in the bunk across from mine you'd better believe I'd be glimpsing at her out of the corner of my eye.
Straight male stares at sexual objects, wohaoa.
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 11:07 PM)

border's Avatar
#675

Originally Posted by RiskyChris:
Straight male stares at sexual objects, wohaoa.
But gay males have evolved beyond that? I can't buy that. Sexuality is powerful and not entirely controllable no matter what your orientation.
shidoshi
GameFan alumnus
ganguro preacher
(03-02-2010, 11:10 PM)

shidoshi's Avatar
#676

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
Besides, frankly most guys aren't nearly as hot as they think they are, and if they were 99% of the time we're not going to tell you.
When I came out to my close group of friends, one of them was telling his wife - which, by the way, was funny: he braced her for this "very serious discussion," and then of course not only was his wife not in the slightest shocked by the whole thing, but she was totally happy for me.

Anyhow, while telling her, he admitted to her that the part that was bothering him the most was, what if I decided at some point that I liked men, and what if I was attracted to him. His wife, point blank, said, "Are you seriously egotistical enough to think that if shidoshi ends up liking guys that out of every possible guy out there he's going to go after you?"

So, yeah, that's where a lot of the fear comes from in regards to men, on both the gay and trans sides: men think way, way too highly of themselves, and assume that everybody is going to be hot for them. *laughs*
RiskyChris
Banned
(03-02-2010, 11:10 PM)
#677

Originally Posted by border:
But gay males have evolved beyond that? I can't buy that. Sexuality is powerful and not entirely controllable no matter what your orientation.
I know plenty of men period that don't do that, so it's not like only gay guys can "turn it off."
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 11:19 PM)

border's Avatar
#678

Originally Posted by RiskyChris:
I know plenty of men period that don't do that, so it's not like only gay guys can "turn it off."
So then you're contradicting your original statement that it's somehow "different" for straight men to be around nude-or-partially clothed women? If someone can turn their sexuality on and off like a switch, then why segregate even by gender?

HINT: Because some people can't turn it off, and even those that do don't entirely trust everyone else.
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 11:24 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#679

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
Oh, yes, I think I'm falling for him already. :lol :lol :lol
:D :D

Quote:
It's like men have this inflated sense of self. You ever wonder why it takes a hetero male so long to get into a woman's pants unless she's pretty open? Because "They just aren't that into you." If guys were nearly as good looking and charming as they thought, women would be dropping their panties all over the place to jump on the pogo stick. It's just not happening. Hetero men believing that gay men would be all over them should remember that we are the equivalent of women in their eyes. If a gay male wants to get into a hetero man's pants, you either 1) rape him or 2) have to do a long winded courtship that, chances are, will have ZERO pay off. Since sexuality does not equate to your morals, if you are a moral person, you're not going to rape someone. That doesn't change because someone is into their own gender. It's simply not worth it when there is someone who will be into you and into your lifestyle just around the corner.

I have several gay male friends, and while they've complimented me on my looks, they have never been forward, never tried to get into my pants, and never once thought they had a chance. It's not my thing, they know that, and they know they won't get me to change. That's simply the way it is. That doesn't change if we're soldiers, either.
Originally Posted by shidoshi:
When I came out to my close group of friends, one of them was telling his wife - which, by the way, was funny: he braced her for this "very serious discussion," and then of course not only was his wife not in the slightest shocked by the whole thing, but she was totally happy for me.

Anyhow, while telling her, he admitted to her that the part that was bothering him the most was, what if I decided at some point that I liked men, and what if I was attracted to him. His wife, point blank, said, "Are you seriously egotistical enough to think that if shidoshi ends up liking guys that out of every possible guy out there he's going to go after you?"

So, yeah, that's where a lot of the fear comes from in regards to men, on both the gay and trans sides: men think way, way too highly of themselves, and assume that everybody is going to be hot for them. *laughs*
I think you both hit the nail pretty much on the head.

Border, it's not that we "turn off" our sexuality, it's just that because we're exposed to the "equipment" on a daily basis it doesn't hold that "mystique" for us. Sure will we notice a nice ass is a nice ass? Of course. But that doesn't mean we'd tell you that any more than you'd tell a random girl her ass was nice.

Would we look at it? We wouldn't ignore it, but frankly whenever I shower I'm there to shower, not to stare at other guys. It's just not that important to me, and most guys look more or less the same anyway.
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 11:25 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#680

Originally Posted by border:
The policy exists more to keep heterosexuals comfortable than it does to prevent homosexuals from being attracted to mates in their platoon. It's less about preventing fraternization and more about keeping things cohesive.
Cohesive to exclude all who do not adhere to an archaic line of thought. We are in agreement that all it does it exclude "all the girls from the boys' club." It has no reason for existing. They only reason heterosexuals would be uncomfortable is because 1) religion or 2) an inflated sense of self.

Quote:
This was a line I've always failed to believe -- that people can just turn their sexuality on and off like that if they know the orientation of the person they are gazing at. I wouldn't coerce or hit on a lesbian, but if I had one in her panties in the bunk across from mine you'd better believe I'd be glimpsing at her out of the corner of my eye.
Wait, so now your wandering eyes account for everyone else's? I love women as much as the next man, but if a woman is a bunk mate, I'll see her as I would another guy. How hard is it to not even pay attention to someone in their skivvies?

But this is the TG thread and I want to swing the discussion back in that direction: how does DADT make any sense in "protecting" people or keeping "cohesion" when someone takes their personal business OFF the base? Under what circumstance would it matter who they are with, as in the case of PFC Barry Winchell?

Furthermore, if a TG is in transition, and has everything but the genitalia, what would it matter that they are bunked with the gender they are transitioning into? If a FtM has everything but the penis, and is as masculine as they come, why would it matter that he showers with his bunk mates while still having a vagina? Why would it matter, also, whom he had sex with? The same with MtF.
RiskyChris
Banned
(03-02-2010, 11:26 PM)
#681

I'm not contradicting anything. I said it was arbitrary as hell. It absolutely is different because you're talking about two genders (one sexuality) vs. one gender (two sexualities). It's a silly line of discussion.
optimiss
Member
(03-02-2010, 11:26 PM)

optimiss's Avatar
#682

I'd like to be added to the list of trans GAFers.
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 11:27 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#683

Originally Posted by optimiss:
I'd like to be added to the list of trans GAFers.
About time you showed up :lol :lol Lexi's been asking me for two days when you'd post :D :D
optimiss
Member
(03-02-2010, 11:32 PM)

optimiss's Avatar
#684

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
About time you showed up :lol :lol Lexi's been asking me for two days when you'd post :D :D
Lol. I didn't see it till just now! I think this thread is an awesome idea though.
Alfarif
This picture? uhh I can explain really!
(03-02-2010, 11:35 PM)

Alfarif's Avatar
#685

Originally Posted by RiskyChris:
I know plenty of men period that don't do that, so it's not like only gay guys can "turn it off."
When was the last guy who ran around with a raging boner trying to have sex with everything under the blue moon? Is that not looked down upon? Or do males hit on every single woman they see? Because I'm pretty sure that's sexual harassment.

I don't "turn off" my sexuality. (What does that even mean?) I don't make it apparent that I want to have sex with people. I don't wear it on my sleeve. And I certainly don't grope women because I'm attracted to them.
Jin34
Member
(03-02-2010, 11:42 PM)

Jin34's Avatar
#686

The hell man it aint like us guys run around like Quagmire :lol
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 11:44 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#687

Originally Posted by Jin34:
The hell man it aint like us guys run around like Quagmire :lol
Or Greatness Gone for that matter :lol

Optimiss - Totally agreed, transgaf really needed a home. It is amazing to me how many of you there are though! :D :D
border
wears the band's shirts to the band's concerts
can't comprehend the origin of terms
(03-02-2010, 11:47 PM)

border's Avatar
#688

Originally Posted by Alfarif:
Wait, so now your wandering eyes account for everyone else's?
Because nobody else here is using their own personal, anecdotal evidence and stories? I'm not saying I'm representative of an entire orientation or gender, but I'm sure as hell not an some weird outlier. If I could stop myself from thinking sexually about women who wouldn't sleep with me, then I'd hardly be thinking of any women at all *rimshot*

Quote:
They only reason heterosexuals would be uncomfortable is because 1) religion or 2) an inflated sense of self.
Or they just don't like worrying about being eyed up by someone that could possibly be attracted to them? Like I said, it's more about people's distrust of others than it is about what will actually happen. If a woman said she didn't want to bunk with men, would you blow her off and accuse her of having an inflated sense of self-worth?

I don't think orientation has any bearing on ability, it's just a hurdle because people are uncomfortable in close quarters when they believe their bunkmates are attracted to them.

Strangely I think it'd go easier for transexuals, just allowing them to bunk with whatever gender they associate with. Most squadmates would see their transsexuality as sufficient proof that their attractions are elsewhere.
Jin34
Member
(03-02-2010, 11:49 PM)

Jin34's Avatar
#689

The next step is the "Hot transgender thread, keep it SFW!" :D
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 11:49 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#690

Originally Posted by Jin34:
The next step is the "Hot transgender thread, keep it SFW!" :D
Knowing gaf that would probably be hugely popular :lol :lol :lol
optimiss
Member
(03-02-2010, 11:53 PM)

optimiss's Avatar
#691

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
Knowing gaf that would probably be hugely popular :lol :lol :lol
It may be hard to keep it going long term considering there are only so many pictures of me to post. zing! :D
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-02-2010, 11:55 PM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#692

Originally Posted by optimiss:
It may be hard to keep it going long term considering there are only so many pictures of me to post. zing! :D
At least, pics that are SFW. ZING! :D
aoi tsuki
(03-03-2010, 12:02 AM)
#693

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
Knowing gaf that would probably be hugely popular :lol :lol :lol
Week one: 250 posts, 10,000 views
optimiss
Member
(03-03-2010, 12:03 AM)

optimiss's Avatar
#694

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
At least, pics that are SFW. ZING! :D
My days of paid camwhoring are over!
Jin34
Member
(03-03-2010, 12:04 AM)

Jin34's Avatar
#695

Originally Posted by optimiss:
It may be hard to keep it going long term considering there are only so many pictures of me to post. zing! :D
Thats why there are digital cameras :D
Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-03-2010, 12:04 AM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#696

Originally Posted by aoi tsuki:
Week one: 250 posts, 10,000 views
And then when you're through jizzing yourself the rest of us can have a go? :D

Originally Posted by optimiss:
My days of paid camwhoring are over!
Giving it away for free then? AWESOME! :D :D :D
optimiss
Member
(03-03-2010, 12:07 AM)

optimiss's Avatar
#697

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
Giving it away for free then? AWESOME! :D :D :D
No, I was just horribly scarred in a hot dog water mishap. :(
aoi tsuki
(03-03-2010, 12:08 AM)
#698

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
And then when you're through jizzing yourself the rest of us can have a go? :D
Actually...

Gaborn
Gaborn News:
Penetrating Your World™
(03-03-2010, 12:08 AM)

Gaborn's Avatar
#699

Originally Posted by optimiss:
No, I was just horribly scarred in a hot dog water mishap. :(
I hear some guys are into scars, you could probably make some money with that....
optimiss
Member
(03-03-2010, 12:15 AM)

optimiss's Avatar
#700

Originally Posted by Gaborn:
I hear some guys are into scars, you could probably make some money with that....
If only I had lost a limb as well, I'd have the devotee market locked up!