|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:38 AM)
|
#401
Originally Posted by Irish:
[IMG]http://i26.************/35m0ffl.png[/IMG] vs. [IMG]http://i30.************/2wf2rmg.jpg[/IMG] (again, face shape, eyes, etc.) |
|
|
|
(07-24-2010, 03:41 AM)
|
#404
Originally Posted by Yoboman:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:46 AM)
|
#408
Originally Posted by Redbeard:
I say fuck the fanboys who are resistant to accept that new Cole breaks continuity. See, I can be just as lame. |
|
Banned
(07-24-2010, 03:48 AM)
|
#409
Originally Posted by Segata Sanshiro:
|
|
Writing a dinosaur space opera symphony
(07-24-2010, 03:48 AM)
|
#410
Originally Posted by corrosivefrost:
Nobody is claiming OG Cole is the best character design of all time. He isn't. Not even by half. However, he is actually not as generic as the current standard stock character in every western game. LOL at people invoking "fanboys resistant to change" arguments for this one. No, sorry guys, this one was just people resistant to boneheaded design decisions. |
|
Banned
(07-24-2010, 03:49 AM)
|
#411
Originally Posted by Kaijima:
|
|
Banned
(07-24-2010, 03:50 AM)
|
#412
Originally Posted by MoonsaultSlayer:
No, I won't dismiss Willem Dafoe in a movie, but he's usually playing fucked up villains and not superheroes, if you catch my drift. The old cole is just so bald and generic, it's like everything bad about character design this gen. Nathan Hale and Cole are indistinguishable. New Cole at least looks fairly unique. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:51 AM)
|
#413
Originally Posted by Redbeard:
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:52 AM)
|
#414
Originally Posted by Yoboman:
Did you cry because Raziel was decayed and missing a jaw? Does it upset you that Mario is a short, fat plumber? What about Link who wears tights... He's an ugly-ass ordinary character who was thrown into this chaotic world. I love it and love SP's balls for making a pathetic character work. I hated the way he looked but got hooked because of the gameplay and story and now prefer it and understand it. I don't need to have good looks, tattoos, and bandages to represent a character I play as in a videogame. I liked having the ordinary doing the incredible. |
|
Banned
(07-24-2010, 03:53 AM)
|
#415
Originally Posted by MoonsaultSlayer:
But in your posts you go to the extremes; as if "the true fans" liked the original, hated the new one; and "people that haven't played a videogame in their life" were the ones that liked the new one.. What about those of that liked his look in the first game and liked (and in my case prefered) the redeisgn in this new one? Or those that just didn't care, because they just wanted to play more inFamous? But when it comes to "drastic" changes is always the same.. Look at Splinter Cell and "Hobo Sam"..then when they changed it back to his more familiar look "Were's mah Hobo Sam Ubisoft?"..or the new Max Payne (lol bald and fat WTF?)....or the classic "lol that looks liek a cartoon what the fuck Nintendo? Celda?".. And heck, based on the crappy blurry pic that was posted (unless it was fake or old), it seems as if the "redesign after listening to fans" is the same character/clothes, but bald...but we'll have to wait for better pictures; not even artwork..since there were 2 different artworks of the previous one...with the one in the game looking more closer to the one from the Game Informer cover, than the artwork that was inside the magazine article per se.. There are always going to be lovers, haters, people that approve, people that don't. But if developers in general have shown one thing, is that they work better when they look for input, but make their own choices. |
|
(07-24-2010, 03:54 AM)
|
#416
Originally Posted by Yoboman:
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:54 AM)
|
#417
I didn't mind the initial change, but the fact that they went back to the original design makes it look more and more like a sequel rather than a reboot which was my honest first impression (new setting, new VA, new character designs)
I just hope that we can visit empire city again later on in Infamous 2 :D |
|
2-Terms of Kombat
(07-24-2010, 03:58 AM)
|
#419
I could learn to live with the look of Nu Cole, but the voice of the new guy just really threw it off for me.
I'm generally in agreement with the people arguing for continuity though. I don't think anyone is saying that the original Cole was some fantastic triumph of character design, but rather that the story was told well enough that we grew to like Cole 1.0 despite his appearance and, it sounds like, some of us even warmed up to the look. I say put a little more hair on his head and leave it at that.
Last edited by Baraka in the White House; 07-24-2010 at 04:03 AM.
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:59 AM)
|
#420
Originally Posted by Redbeard:
He's still a fscking retread. Keep the one that DOESN'T break continuity. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 03:59 AM)
|
#422
Originally Posted by Yoboman:
And I'd bet most of those devs who use bald characters will tell you they did it because they didn't want to deal with trying to make hair look good. The only other option, it seems, is making Nathan Drake-like hair. The hair doesn't even bother me and shouldn't even be factored into this debate at all because none of us who prefer the old Cole give 2 shits about hair. It's the facial structure and overall look and age of the character that upsets us.... not to mention personality. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:01 AM)
|
#423
Originally Posted by Irish:
Damn it Broken, everyone knows they should just make him like old Cole with ginger hair! Seriously, we gingers need a protagonist!!!!!!!!! vs's would agree!!!!! |
|
(07-24-2010, 04:03 AM)
|
#424
Originally Posted by Redbeard:
I don't see how someone could call Old Cole generic and New Cole unique, I really don't. I'd say New Cole is a far more generic-looking character. I could swing a cat and hit fifty New Coles in Hollywood. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:03 AM)
|
#425
Originally Posted by DOO13ER:
Watch this http://blog.us.playstation.com/2010/...-con-cutscene/ Sounds pretty damn good to me! |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:04 AM)
|
#426
Originally Posted by fernoca:
The number one example of this that comes to mind is Capcom with Ryu. But that's a bit of a different situation. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:04 AM)
|
#427
Originally Posted by Redbeard:
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:05 AM)
|
#428
Originally Posted by Segata Sanshiro:
|
|
Favorite Poster on the Citadel
(07-24-2010, 04:10 AM)
|
#429
I really like NewCole Squared™'s kinda protolook. Take original Cole, soften the facial features to make him look younger, smooth out his skin a little, and you're good to go. The total redesign was unfortunate--regardless of what you think of the design, it just creates continuity problems. And all those tattoos look like something out of Mirror's Edge. I don't really think it fit the universe of the game.
They could have just made it like Cole's son. Or Alternate Cole shocked into being by Kessler. No need to be so....I dunno, canonical. But if you're going to be that way, you gotta make it LOOK like the same guy. |
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 04:14 AM)
|
#430
Originally Posted by MoonsaultSlayer:
Then again, I guess all the "true fans" forgot about Cole screaming "OH HELL YEAH!" and having genuine fun when he discovered he could grind on powerlines and whatnot. |
|
Banned
(07-24-2010, 04:20 AM)
|
#432
Originally Posted by corrosivefrost:
According to the developers, the change in look and attitude of the character (aside "fan feedback" and the "skateboard thing") was because they wanted to show a Cole that was more ..comfortable, and happy with his powers. That accepted his powers as a gift, instead of a curse....so they decided to change many things. Granted, is not like the original Cole was that serious...but he acted more pissed off because of the events happening to him and around him. Same with Zeke and they wanting a more friendly and ready to fight-look, granted Zeke's change wasn't as "drastic"....and people would be screaming if they made Zeke skinny-fit..but still.. :lol |
|
(07-24-2010, 04:22 AM)
|
#435
Originally Posted by Irish:
|
|
Favorite Poster on the Citadel
(07-24-2010, 04:27 AM)
|
#439
Originally Posted by dilatedmuscle:
|
|
(07-24-2010, 04:30 AM)
|
#441
Originally Posted by Ether_Snake:
Like I said earlier, I'd be totally okay and even happy if they altered Old Cole's appearance to reflect his supposed new attitude, but within the realm of believability. Growing out the hair, growing a little facial hair, wearing some new duds, even getting a tatty or two, that's all fine by me. Total facial reconstruction and de-aging 10 years, not so much. |
|
is too reasonable
for this forum (07-24-2010, 04:33 AM)
|
#442
My problem with new Cole, besides the tribal tattoos, was how cynical and unnecessary the changes were.
It'd be one thing if Sucker Punch said "Yeah, Cole decided to start fresh and put his past behind him, so he grew out his hair and changed his clothes." That's a reasonable excuse! But they pretty explicitly said "Some people didn't like the original Cole we designed, and this design tests well, so we're going with this." This is why I'm raising an eyebrow at all the people imploring Sucker Punch to stick to their original vision and not listen to fan outcries. If you wanted that, wouldn't you have wanted the original design from inFamous 1 from the getgo? Or, let me put it another way: If the news story were "Sucker Punch casts off focus testing, returns Cole back to his original design," do you think you'd stay quiet or find a new angle to complain from? |
|
is too reasonable
for this forum (07-24-2010, 04:36 AM)
|
#445
Originally Posted by Irish:
|
|
Member
(07-24-2010, 05:59 AM)
|
#449
Remember the reaction of this when it was first revealed? Now it is one of the most beloved and memorable art direction ever in a game.
What would it be had Nintendo freaked out and pulled the plug after that outcry? That's the difference between a developer that have faith in themselves and a developer that does not.
|