|
Member
(10-03-2010, 04:19 AM)
|
NBA Jam's Trey Smith "We're trying to throw it all in there" (360/PS3)
#1
Our local sports radio station in Toronto, FAN 590, has a video game show every weekend called Got Game, and today they aired an interview with NBA Jam's Creative Director Trey Smith.
Podcast of the show is HERE. Interview starts at 15:40. They talk about various topics including licensing, selection process of the roster, and Remix tour (length of Remix Tour is 38 hours at the minimum!). At the end (25:50) he had this to say about the next gen versions:
Originally Posted by Trey Smith:
|
|
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 04:23 AM)
|
#5
Based on the interview, I'm guessing one of the things they may be adding is online co-op to Remix tour (It does have offline co-op). If they do that, I think this may warrant $50. In the interview they said Remix tour takes 38 hours to beat by their best testers. Thats a ton of content.
Its PURE speculation on my part, but thats the only thing that comes to mind when he says they are blowing out the online mode.
Last edited by infinityBCRT; 10-03-2010 at 04:32 AM.
|
|
(10-03-2010, 04:29 AM)
|
#6
This is hilarious. EA's Wii support has always been near-throwaway, but to see the scrambling to make the PS360 version of this game leaps and bounds better due to online exhibition and online co-op is just crazy. No more pretending that they ever really wanted this to be Wii exclusive, now. :lol
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(10-03-2010, 04:31 AM)
|
#7
awesome. since NBA Elite is so immensely awful, it's nice they're gonna try to make the NBA Jam PS360 the definitive versions. Honestly NBA Elite was so bad I was reconsidering buying it even though it was going to have NBA Jam in it because i didn't want to send the developers the message I actually liked that treasonous piece of shit
will buy |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 04:45 AM)
|
#8
Originally Posted by AniHawk:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 04:54 AM)
|
#11
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
|
|
(10-03-2010, 05:04 AM)
|
#14
wii version sent to die.
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:08 AM)
|
#15
Originally Posted by Nabs:
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(10-03-2010, 05:09 AM)
|
#17
I honestly cannot imagine i can describe just how bad it is.
The demo was SO BAD and the fan reaction so dramatic, that EA delayed the game because the quality was so poor. It had like a billion glitches every five seconds. Shit just outright doesn't work. Some videos of fan reaction playing the game are hilarious watch this video. Watch the entire thing "This dude is standing in the middle of the motherfucking court standing there like Jesus" :lol [img]http://i53.************/juk5s4.jpg[/img] |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:14 AM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:15 AM)
|
#19
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
|
|
downloading Angry Birds
(10-03-2010, 05:20 AM)
|
#21
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:26 AM)
|
#23
Originally Posted by Gravijah:
about 60 million |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:27 AM)
|
#24
Originally Posted by oldschoolpinball:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:28 AM)
|
#25
Does the sixth foul give the other team a powerplay now? I'm interested to see how they go foward with NBA Jam's pricing. If they're scrambling to add features instead of making it a basic feature i'm starting to lean towards a full game with a possibility of it being less than 60. Wouldn't be surprised though if it does retail at 60 though.
|
|
how can the baaasheep
enjoy the shootbang? (10-03-2010, 05:28 AM)
|
#26
This is such a cluster. I don't know why people are happy this ends up being a worse deal for gamers.
Buy NBA Elite for 60 plus pre order bonuses (10 dollar amazon credit at the very least), take the nba jam code and use it then sell elite for 40 to 45 dollars. Now we gotta pay 60 for NBA Jam with a bunch of extra garbage added on top we really didn't need. No thanks. |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:30 AM)
|
#27
Originally Posted by Gravijah:
I'd like to see the original version they were going to ship to see why they pulled the plug. Were review copies ever sent out? It's nice their sprucing up this version further rather than throwing it out there, but if there's no single player career with the special guest characters, I might just stick with the Wii version. |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 05:31 AM)
|
#28
Originally Posted by riceandbeans:
|
|
(10-03-2010, 05:59 AM)
|
#31
Originally Posted by Mooreberg:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 06:21 AM)
|
#35
Originally Posted by oldschoolpinball:
Quote:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 06:36 AM)
|
#36
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
|
|
STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
(10-03-2010, 06:36 AM)
|
#37
Nintendo really needs to work on its exclusivity deals.
Like, do they ever actually get something in writing or do they just kind of assume because a publisher says something is exclusive that it is going to continue to be exclusive? This is kind of like the whole RE4 situation. It's a Nintendo platform exclusive, until a couple months before it comes out when the publisher goes NO NO DON'T WORRY IT'S COMING OUT WITH MORE CONTENT ON ANOTHER PLATFORM! |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 06:37 AM)
|
#38
Originally Posted by Htown:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 07:22 AM)
|
#40
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
|
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 08:00 AM)
|
#42
Originally Posted by Momo:
Transformation in about a month: Cool Exclusive Wii Title > Just a freebie for a game on other systems > The worst version out of all platform without online and HD It's still your good old NBA Jam, but if I tell a Xbox owner that his Halo Reach can be found as a pack-in game for Wii Party on the Wii, and then later tell him that his Halo Reach doesn't even have online multiplayer while the Wii version has it, what would he think? I guess he can still 'enjoy' the campaign.
Last edited by seady; 10-03-2010 at 08:11 AM.
|
|
Banned
(10-03-2010, 08:10 AM)
|
#43
The Wii version is currently a fully fledged product while the 360/PS3 version is still being tweaked and added onto no? I don't own a Wii, but I find it odd that Wii owners are negative about a game which by rights should be better on Wii. (horrible online apart)
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(10-03-2010, 08:10 AM)
|
#44
Originally Posted by Momo:
But it's not just online - better visuals, of course. |
|
(10-03-2010, 08:20 AM)
|
#45
Originally Posted by Darklord:
|
|
Banned
(10-03-2010, 08:24 AM)
|
#46
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
I get the impression that people who primarily play Wii (more so Wii only gamers) doesn't see online as a huge thing. The only time I can really remember a Wii game taking off online was with Brawl. If the local multiplay (which I would assume would be how Wii players would multiplay) is up to scratch, it should be fine. And Wii gamers play mostly on SDTV anyway? The rest of us would look to our PS360 for the feature bump and the added visual fidelity, I just don't see it being a concern for "regular" Wii owners. |
|
Member
(10-03-2010, 08:38 AM)
|
#47
Originally Posted by Momo:
And I seriously don't think the HD thing is important to most people....Hell, half of my friends who own PS3s/360s play on SDTVs.... Wait, are we really still debating these points? Anyways, to me, this is just another example of a third party who pulled a "self-fulfilled prophecy" bit--with how they treat Wii owners, it's no surprise their titles don't sell well. |
|
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
(10-03-2010, 08:45 AM)
|
#48
Originally Posted by seady:
3 pointer hook shots! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTTKap_V0s0&fmt=22 First Jesus Now Ballerinas? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uDnOsAwe5c Jesus Bynum rocket dunk from free throw line - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay6MSRHy4Gg&fmt=22 KG rocket dunk from the free throw line REEEEEEEMIIIIIX - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utBOZL7cJPo&fmt=37 |
