|
Member
(10-05-2010, 12:05 AM)
|
#51
Originally Posted by Hilbert:
|
|
|
|
Combovers don't work when there is no hair
(10-05-2010, 12:06 AM)
|
#52
Originally Posted by Anticitizen One:
|
|
Banned
(10-05-2010, 12:30 AM)
|
#54
Originally Posted by Fritz:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 12:31 AM)
|
#55
Originally Posted by Anticitizen One:
|
|
Banned
(10-05-2010, 01:57 AM)
|
#57
Originally Posted by Hilbert:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 02:28 AM)
|
#58
Originally Posted by LakeEarth:
|
|
First tragedy, then farce.
(10-05-2010, 02:31 AM)
|
#59
I don't think you can really turn a Lovecraft book into a movie without completely missing the point.
It is about the first person narrative written by someone who was truly terrified of things they either saw, or in many cases simply heard 2nd hand. For instance, Mountains of Madness isn't about a war between Cthulu and the great old ones at all, yet I fear the movie could easily go that way. |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 02:55 AM)
|
#61
Originally Posted by Manos: The Hans of Fate:
Lovecraft = Fear of cultural degeneration/homogenization, miscegenation, and loss of Anglo-American identity; considered white people and western 'white' culture superior to black people and African American culture. Marked appreciation for Asian and Arabic cultures; married a Jewish woman despite casual anti-semitic opinions, and felt considerable distain for plenty of white ethnic groups outside his small sphere of preferred western nations. Robert E. Howard = Negroes are cartoonish muscle-bound simpletons to be gazed upon in awe, like King Kong, or mocked mercilessly if they try to act like real people. Seriously. Howard is one of my favourite authors, but his work is indefensibly racist. Profoundly racist. I-wouldn't-even-quote-it-to-prove-a-point racist. The notion that Lovecraft was far more racist than most of his contemporaries is patently false. The man died in 1937. Rosa Parks was still sitting in the 'coloured' section of the bus when she was asked to give up her seat to a white passenger in 1955! Having read much of his correspondence (I own several volumes of his collected letters) it's clear that historical revisionism has played a part in this myth. So much of his private correspondence survives, and so much of it is so un-PC, that people want to put him in a special box: "Lovecraft was super racist - way more than my great grandparents, who had all started to figure that stuff out by then!". The fact is, in his letters, Lovecraft constantly argues, debates, and butts heads with his friends on a variety of topics. I don't recall a single incident during which he defended his racial attitudes in response to a disagreement; unlike his political opinions, or countless other branches of his personal philosophy. Lovecraft's racism was not insidious or genocidal. It wasn't even hateful. It was just distressingly well-thought-out. It was based entirely in a fear of alien influences and people who he saw as encroaching on his proud Anglo-American nation. Most conservative, traditionally-minded white people believed themselves culturally and racially superior to all others - whether these others were black, Asian, or simply other white people from a 'less sophisticated' part of Europe! As for Lovecraft's fiction, his most racist work is limited to two stories. The first of these is The Horror At Red Hook, written when he lived in New York, which lumps all the terrifying foreign ghetto elements into a single insidious cult of nefarious evil doers. It basically demonizes poverty stricken immigrant ruffians. It doesn't single out any specific group, and its racism is more a byproduct of the writer's intense xenophobia than anything else. The second of these stories is Arthur Jermyn, which isn't overtly racist - it can merely be interpreted allegorically (something Lovecraft did not intend - he loathed allegorical fiction), and focuses on a man who learns one of his ancestors mated with the queen of a tribe of white apes to father a degenerate line of tainted offspring. It displays a phobia of bigfoot more than a phobia of non-whites, though the African tribes mentioned incidentally are treated with a typical colonial attitude. Other stories are peppered with casually racist references (cat named 'Nigger-man', references to the Inuit as 'Esquimaux' etc.) but these are tactless faux pas typical of a pre-racially-conscientious culture rather than expressions of bigotry. The difference between Lovecraft and Robert E. Howard might be that Lovecraft left behind a body of letters which have been carefully studied and catalogued, before being broken down and distilled into biographical form. These letters certainly display racist attitudes, the more shocking for being so well thought out. Where the man on the street may have felt blacks were inferior, Lovecraft took that feeling or cultural bias and dissected it in order to justify it as part of the tapestry of his worldview. As has been said, this attitude softened considerably as he aged. As far as I recall, he was always a firm opponent of the Nazis, even before the war broke out. This rather surprised me, since he was always a supporter of Aryan racial theory and initially believed that utopia lay in an elitist government in which the wise ruled and the masses were grateful to be given direction. But his philosophy changed profoundly over the course of his life. In the 1930s, plenty of his contemporaries had no real issue with the Nazi agenda before the warmongering and atrocities became manifest, but Lovecraft always had a problem with the fascism; his own conservative politics softening to much more liberal, socialistic attitudes towards the end of his life. His classism gave way to empathy in the wake of the destruction wrought upon his beloved New England by the Wall Street Crash of 1929, and the resulting Great Depression. Racial preferences weren't a primary motivator for his politics or belief system, they were merely a byproduct. Artistic experience and sensual pleasure were his bread and butter. All he really wanted was to be surrounded by like-minded Anglo-Americans who loved England and King George, and whose patronage would allow him to live his life free of financial worry or social upheaval. |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 03:04 AM)
|
#62
I recently re-read Herbert West: Reanimator. Good stuff. Need to see the movie again, it's been years.
Dagon was a cool movie too, otherwise a lot of the adaptations have been disappointing. Also, Cthulhu lives!
Quote:
|
|
aka Mister Chef
(10-05-2010, 03:43 AM)
|
#64
This is my favorite Lovecraft compilation by far, and I fully recommend it to anyone who wants to get into the Cthulhu mythos:
http://www.amazon.com/Best-H-P-Lovec...6250007&sr=8-1 It's missing a few of his best stories, but it is still a great introduction to his work, and it's just $11 :D |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 03:56 AM)
|
#65
Long time since I've read a Lovecraft work. I remember my local library having these 3 huuuuuge books covering the Cthulhu mythos, unrelated works and the dream texts with analysis and similar works from Derleth. My mum had one of the funniest face when I came back from the library with something like 20 cm in thickness of books :lol
|
|
Sperm Receptacle
(10-05-2010, 03:57 AM)
|
#66
![]() Everyone who's even slightly interested in Lovecraft or Cthulhu owes it to themselves to see this film. The Call of Cthulhu is a very faithful adaptation of Lovecraft's story, presented as it would have been had it been produced in the golden age of silent cinema! And the best part? You can stream it on Netflix! GO GAF GO! |
|
aka Mister Chef
(10-05-2010, 04:29 AM)
|
#69
Originally Posted by Extollere:
http://www.amazon.com/Best-H-P-Lovec...6250007&sr=8-1 Trust me :D If you don't believe me take a look at the ratings and reviews by customers. |
|
Banned
(10-05-2010, 05:13 AM)
|
#70
Originally Posted by Aske:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 06:38 AM)
|
#71
Originally Posted by Manos: The Hans of Fate:
|
|
Combovers don't work when there is no hair
(10-05-2010, 08:05 AM)
|
#72
Originally Posted by Manos: The Hans of Fate:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 09:36 AM)
|
#73
Originally Posted by Snaku:
Also, In the mouth of madness is the best "normal" lovecraftian movie imo. Not because it tells a story he would have written, but because it's a wonderful and completely insane homage. |
|
Banned
(10-05-2010, 10:18 AM)
|
#75
Originally Posted by Hilbert:
There's also a direct-to-DVD 2010 movie (26th October) called Altitude, apparently inspired by Lovecraft. However, impressions seem pretty bad. |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 10:28 AM)
|
#76
There is also the musical - A Shoggoth On The Roof.
|
|
Banned
(10-05-2010, 12:47 PM)
|
#77
Originally Posted by Aske:
http://www.rehupa.com/romeo_southern.htm But yeah Howard was pretty damn racist.
Last edited by Manos: The Hans of Fate; 02-05-2011 at 02:09 AM.
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 04:28 PM)
|
#78
Originally Posted by LakeEarth:
For the dedicated fan, you might be interested in listening to this interview with S.T. Joshi from the Point of Inquiry podcast. http://www.pointofinquiry.org/st_jos...d_freethought/ It is a podcast about athiesm, but they do talk about H.P. Lovecraft's atheism, his philosophy, his racism and Joshi's other books about religion. It is pretty interesting. I actually did not care for that black and white Cthulu movie. I thought it was pretty bad. Yea, it was an exact telling of the story, but the story is not made to be a movie. Exact translations of lovecrafts work have never really worked as a movie. |
|
correct about everything
(10-05-2010, 05:00 PM)
|
#79
On a lighter note, anyone read Neil Gaiman's I, Cthulhu? I found it to be rather funny.
|
|
all good things
(10-05-2010, 06:14 PM)
|
#81
Originally Posted by Snaku:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 06:25 PM)
|
#82
Originally Posted by Aske:
Nothing like Conan beating up "ape-men" almost every other story. :lol |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 06:51 PM)
|
#83
I know this is the OT (and I know there are going to be some who disagree with me), but if you like Lovecraft's writings and like video games, Eternal Darkness (GameCube) is about as good as it gets. Call of Cthulu: Dark Corners of the Earth might have the official license, but it's nowhere near as good. ED does Lovecraftian horror right.
Originally Posted by Hilbert:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 07:11 PM)
|
#85
Originally Posted by Night_Trekker:
Has anyone seen these? http://www.amazon.com/H-P-Lovecraft-.../dp/B0015U0QNK I haven't had a chance to yet. edit: Hey it's on instant watch! I know what I am doing tonight! |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 07:13 PM)
|
#86
Originally Posted by Night_Trekker:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=409144 I did touch upon ED and DCotE, and was rightly schooled by the experts in all the titles I had missed, most significantly (and recently) is Amnesia: the Dark Descent, which I shall be downloading and trying tonight. So check that thread out for the gaming angle... |
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 07:18 PM)
|
#87
Originally Posted by Night_Trekker:
Though if you want to read his true take on H.P.'s works you need to read Jerusalem's Lot, a short story you can find in Night Shift, I believe. Almost no relation to the vampire story 'Salem's Lot. Very much about unspoken eldritch horrors and a narrator who may or may not be stark raving mad... |
|
Purple Drazi
(10-05-2010, 07:19 PM)
|
#88
Originally Posted by John Dunbar:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 07:21 PM)
|
#89
Originally Posted by Imbarkus:
|
|
Member
(10-05-2010, 07:51 PM)
|
#90
on the Lovecraftian path, farther away from Stephen King and closer to actual legitimate literature, I would highly recommend Algernon Blackwood
he is mentioned in Lovecrafts essay "Supernatural Horror In Literature"
Quote:
|
|
Member
(10-06-2010, 05:53 AM)
|
#91
Originally Posted by Imbarkus:
|
|
Member
(12-02-2010, 05:13 PM)
|
#92
I read some Lovecraft novels the last week, and he is (fucking) awesome. I especially liked Colour out of Space and Dunwhich Horror, and will read At the Mountain of Madness tonight. I thought he's work had aged horribly, but it's really enjoyable.
Started reading because of the Del Toro film that will come out; I am stoked. |
|
Member
(12-02-2010, 06:16 PM)
|
#93
If you love Lovecraftian stuff, be sure to check out the Laundry series by Charles Stross, starting with The Atrocity Archives.
|
|
Purple Drazi
(12-02-2010, 08:04 PM)
|
#94
Originally Posted by Purkake4:
|
|
(12-02-2010, 08:17 PM)
|
#95
Originally Posted by El_Victor:
Lovecraft is great, I'm gonna have to knock down a few more stories while I'm on Xmas break. |
|
Member
(12-02-2010, 08:32 PM)
|
#96
Originally Posted by Aske:
Lovecraft had his moments but his writing is quite leadened and he could obsess over architecture to the point of killing the flow of his own stories. |
|
Member
(12-02-2010, 08:37 PM)
|
#97
Interesting thread. Bookmarked!
I read a number of short story collections by Lovecraft plus his short novel To the Mountains of Madness many years ago. Favorite story is probably Shadows over Innsmouth. Also read a collection RE Howard's Lovecraft pastiches. The problem I have with many Cthulhu tales though is that many are regurgitating the same plot over and over again: a modern traveler comes to a remote town/house/lake/glade/etc, everything feels wrong, he wakes a hidden force of evil from its long slumber and loses his mind when he sees what should never be seen with human eyes. I think I prefer the fantasy worlds created by Lord Dunsany or Clark Ashton Smith. I wonder why they never got the recognition RE Howard and HP Lovecraft received after their deaths. |
|
Member
(12-02-2010, 08:56 PM)
|
#99
A game that was obviously influenced by Lovecraft was a Japanese PC game called Saya no Uta.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SayaNoUta It was translated into English. After playing it I was sick in my stomach. |
|
PoliGAF Co-Champion
(12-02-2010, 09:19 PM)
|
#100
I just bought the board game, Arkham Horror, for a friend. I played it a long time ago, but they clearly updated it. It looks great. My buddy is a huge Lovecraft fiend, and I generally get him something Lovecraftian every year. There's certainly no lack of merchandise.
Speaking of, anyone popped for one of these yet?
|