|
Member
(01-04-2011, 07:54 PM)
|
Crytek details - Crysis: 3+ million. Warhead: 1.5+ million. Far Cry: 2.5+ million
#1
(Credit goes to Ogs for finding this tidbit on the GT forums. Thought it was interesting enough for its own topic)
http://www.zuse.hessen.de/mm/Konrad_...erli_Final.pdf For all the crap about the "sales crysis" the series encounter, for all the nonsense about how piracy alone sent Crytek to consoles, and for all the negative press about how the game required a "$3000 PC" to run, these are some pretty amazing numbers if you ask me. It's also worth noting that 3+ million for Crysis puts it in competitive leage with Far Cry 2 - Ubisoft's multiplatform game that sold 2.9 million as of 1 year ago. So we have a PC exclusive that made a profit on a $22 million budget as of 2+ years ago, and has continued to sell since then, but was apparently in "crysis" due to piracy, is right up there in sales with a multi-platform, probably bigger-budget game, that was hailed for being a tremendous success. Really makes me think about hyperbole in games press - both positive and negative. Other tidbits: They've released "3 AAA games" (Far Cry, Crysis, Warhead), but claim that have 5 currently in development. We know 3, what could the others be? ---Crysis 2 ---Warface ---Codename: Kingdoms (exclusive 360 game) They're also an astoundingly large company:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 07:59 PM)
|
#5
PC developers generally have a better idea of how to budget. They don't spend $100 million developing one game, which is why they can make a good profit even on 1 platform. CryTek games have the free marketing bonus of being cutting edge graphical showcase games. Everyone who builds a new PC goes back an grabs Crysis off Steam to see their new toy in action.
|
|
point your penis at me,
and have a good day (01-04-2011, 08:01 PM)
|
#10
Originally Posted by Zzoram:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:04 PM)
|
#12
Originally Posted by Darklord:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:04 PM)
|
#13
Originally Posted by Darklord:
I mean yeah, obviously piracy is an issue, and some of those pirated copies mean lost sales (no one knows how many), but Valve has the right idea on this. It's a smart idea to go multiplatform for them, but only because it means extra revenue. Looking at the size of their company - that has still today only released PC exclusives - it's quite obvious that piracy hasn't been too damaging.
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:05 PM)
|
#14
Originally Posted by Solo:
Anyways, I'm still surprised considering Far Cry 2 was on 3 platforms, opposed to Crysis which is a PC game expected to get lower sales because people who can't run it and piracy. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:06 PM)
|
#15
Originally Posted by Solo:
|
|
point your penis at me,
and have a good day (01-04-2011, 08:10 PM)
|
#17
Originally Posted by szaromir:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:10 PM)
|
#18
Originally Posted by Zzoram:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:11 PM)
|
#19
Originally Posted by dLMN8R:
I distinctly remember that right when it came out word was it sold very poorly - this was gleefully reported by all the American games media. CryTek bitching and whining started immediately. It later turned out sales were decent. And like I said, Crysis has been burning steadily since. Crisis averted. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:11 PM)
|
#20
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
People will continue to claim that PC gaming is dead/dying while information like this is ignored because the original comments by Yerli were far more quotable than these sales figures. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:13 PM)
|
#22
Originally Posted by Dave Long:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:16 PM)
|
#26
Originally Posted by Visualante:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:16 PM)
|
#27
Originally Posted by Salacious Crumb:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:19 PM)
|
#29
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
|
|
I do not avoid women, GAF, but I do deny them my essence.
(01-04-2011, 08:24 PM)
|
#32
Far Cry does kind of suck. The gameplay wasn't up to par with HL2 and Doom 3 on release, and it hasn't aged well since. It was great at the time because no one else had done a game like it, but now that people have and done it much better since (especially Crytek itself with Crysis) it doesn't hold up.
Although, it did lead to the two best (imo) FPS games released this generation with Crysis and Far Cry 2. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:28 PM)
|
#36
I just hope that going multiplatform and having so many games doesn't threaten their existence by fracturing their talent into too many directions. Nothing wrong with a little ambition, but Crytek has expanded fast. Reminds me of CDProjekt.
I also wish they had released another expansion to Crysis. Warhead was great and must have been pretty cheap to do. Edit. Far Cry 2 is amazing. If there were no checkpoints that game would have been almost perfect. |
|
I do not avoid women, GAF, but I do deny them my essence.
(01-04-2011, 08:29 PM)
|
#38
Originally Posted by szaromir:
|
|
Banned
(01-04-2011, 08:30 PM)
|
#39
Originally Posted by dionysus:
|
|
Americans out of Mexico! The Border Tax Equity Act
(01-04-2011, 08:34 PM)
|
#40
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
FC3 should fix: -Enemy AI -Respawn checkpoints -Better plot |
|
Banned
(01-04-2011, 08:34 PM)
|
#41
Originally Posted by Mr_Brit:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:35 PM)
|
#42
FarCry was fantastic up till the fucking Trigens
FarCry 2 has the most hideous graphics of any modern AAA game. The fact that every single person in the game hated you and tried to kill you ruined the game. If there had been some civilian NPCs the immersion would have been much better. Also the stealth was broken and enemies hunted you down like they were they damn Predator. I had so high hopes for this game.... Oh, and respawing enemies and checkpoints..... And then suddenly...fucking jeep out of nowhere plows your ass..... |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:38 PM)
|
#45
No licensing fees. PC games make almost 30% more profit per sale than console games.
Crysis is in an interesting position, cause years later, it's still considered one of - if not THE showpiece game for a PC rig. I mean, what bigger, better looking FPS games have come out since? Battlefield: Bad Company 2 looks good, but nothing as good as Crysis. So the Crysis games have continued to sell as people continue to upgrade their PCs. It's one of those games you pick up with a new computer to see what it can do...and to play a great FPS. The thing is, Crytek looks at that $22 Million number...and wonders what they COULD have made if the game was on consoles. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:40 PM)
|
#47
Originally Posted by The Antitype:
|
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:43 PM)
|
#48
Originally Posted by kamspy:
Both the gamelay and the graphics are the best of any FPS ever made. My personal top 3 1) Crysis (PC) 2) Halo franchise (360) 3) Everything else |
|
I do not avoid women, GAF, but I do deny them my essence.
(01-04-2011, 08:44 PM)
|
#49
Originally Posted by DennisK4:
And I think Far Cry 2 is one of the best looking games out there on PC. I know you don't seem to enjoy the style, but if you do (and I do) the game is gorgeous. The main issue with Far Cry 2 is that it obviously isn't finished and there are obvious shortcuts taken to release the game at the time they did. |
|
Member
(01-04-2011, 08:45 PM)
|
#50
Originally Posted by Lagspike_exe:
|