|
Member
(03-21-2011, 06:26 PM)
|
#151
I remember seeing Lee at the BAFTAS. He looked very, frail and weak and could barely walk without his stick. I wonder in what capacity he'll be featured
|
|
|
|
Banned
(03-21-2011, 06:31 PM)
|
#152
Originally Posted by bengraven:
|
|
Banned
(03-21-2011, 06:34 PM)
|
#153
I see them as one big film, not three divided and individually rated. Judging them singularly misses the point, IMO.
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 06:39 PM)
|
#154
Originally Posted by Solo:
Wow. You just summed up my thought on Fellowship perfectly. I think it's the best LOTR film even though TTT and ROTK are fantastic. The breaking of the fellowship couldn’t have been done better. Hobbit will be awesome. |
|
The Tree of Liberty
(03-21-2011, 06:49 PM)
|
#155
Originally Posted by JayDubya:
Fellowship feels the most grounded despite jumping from the Shire to Moria to the Dead Marshes AND explaining who everyone is and what they're doing. All of the charm of Tolkien comes across much clearer in the first, whereas the second is basically a long build up to Helm's Deep (interrupted by trees) and the third kind of drags on. And I agree with others in this thread; I kind of like the Hobbit a little more than the LotR. I've probably read the Trilogy 2 or 3 times, but I feel like every year or so I grab my wrinkled old paperback and blow through it again. It's shorter, but also a bit lighthearted, which makes it easier to read through than LotR's heavier subject matter. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 06:50 PM)
|
#156
Originally Posted by Solo:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 06:53 PM)
|
#157
My most anticipated move ever.
I just hope its at least 3 hours long! |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 06:53 PM)
|
#158
Originally Posted by Solo:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:04 PM)
|
#159
Originally Posted by Wray:
Fellowship is by far the best movie. I'm not sure how anyone could disagree. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:12 PM)
|
#160
Originally Posted by WyndhamPrice:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:29 PM)
|
#161
Originally Posted by OuterWorldVoice:
Sign me up for this one! THE WAIT IS KILLING ME |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:37 PM)
|
#162
Originally Posted by Wray:
Reminded me of dune where the only good parts were the sayings at the start of the chapters. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:43 PM)
|
#163
I wonder who will do the voice for Smaug (does he speak?) and the part of Tom Bombadil (although he'd be difficult to portray to audiences. Far harder than someone like Galadriel).
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 07:51 PM)
|
#164
Originally Posted by Solo:
|
|
Banned
(03-21-2011, 07:54 PM)
|
#165
Originally Posted by Mashing:
|
|
The Tree of Liberty
(03-21-2011, 09:57 PM)
|
#166
Originally Posted by Mashing:
2. Unless they're shoehorning him into the film, I don't remember Tom Bombadil making any appearances in the Hobbit. Perhaps you're thinking Beorn (who has already been cast). |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:03 PM)
|
#167
Originally Posted by Retro:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:03 PM)
|
#168
Originally Posted by Mashing:
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(03-21-2011, 10:03 PM)
|
#169
Just coming in here to smile with glee at this coming film
Lord of the Rings :swoon: |
|
if I suck dick, are my arguments less valid?
(03-21-2011, 10:12 PM)
|
#170
Originally Posted by Retro:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:14 PM)
|
#171
ROTK = FOTR > TTT
Can't fecking wait for for this. If it's even half the quality the LOTR trilogy are, we're in for a treat. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:20 PM)
|
#172
Originally Posted by Wray:
|
|
The Tree of Liberty
(03-21-2011, 10:20 PM)
|
#173
Originally Posted by Mashing:
Beorn, in my opinion, is much less whimsical than Bombadil, so he should carry over to film a bit easier. He's basically a big tall dude who lives alone in a huge house surrounded by wildflowers with animal helpers. Which is a little strange, of course, but a bit easier for non-Tolkien fans to swallow than a big bearded guy who does not. stop. singing. But yeah, Smaug definitely talks (and has some great lines), so do the spiders, and the Goblins have some actual lines in the Misty Mountains. If the rule for Lord of the Rings was "Everybody walks, even the trees", then the theme for The Hobbit is "Everybody talks". And I will be much alarmed if nary an "Attercop" is heard...
Originally Posted by agrajag:
Originally Posted by DUFFMCWALIN:
Originally Posted by Lonestar:
Last edited by Retro; 03-21-2011 at 10:32 PM.
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:22 PM)
|
#174
Woohoo finally!!! This should be great. Now if they somehow figure out how to split up the Silmarillion to make it into a few movies I would die of happiness.
Probably impossible I know :| |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 10:22 PM)
|
#175
I had heard Christopher Lee liked the idea of voicing Smaug. But that was awhile back.
|
|
Banned
(03-21-2011, 11:23 PM)
|
#176
Originally Posted by BobLoblaw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ9NOV3KNpY |
|
Banned
(03-21-2011, 11:31 PM)
|
#177
Will the Hobbit have epic wars like Helms Deeps or Battle for Pelannor Fields? I haven't read the books.
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:34 PM)
|
#178
Originally Posted by Solo:
But I won't because it's late. I'm tired. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:35 PM)
|
#179
Originally Posted by params7:
The majority of the novel is about Bilbo adventuring with Dwarfs. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:42 PM)
|
#180
Originally Posted by Solo:
And now I'm going to have to watch the movies in order after hearing this music. Thanks! |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:42 PM)
|
#181
There is a battle/war at the end but biblo is "unconscious" so you only read bits relating to people involved in it other than that it would be a spider battle and goblin/wolf battle, Smaug HAS to speak as he is The Bigboss and has atleast three pages of dialogue from memory, His voice would suit they guy that played saurman (sp)
No Tom Bambilbee is not in The Hobbit. If you haven't read it, read it. Its an awesome, awesome book. |
|
sober, clothed, willing
(03-21-2011, 11:44 PM)
|
#182
Originally Posted by JayDubya:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:46 PM)
|
#183
Originally Posted by WJD:
|
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:48 PM)
|
#184
Get hype!
Can't wait to see Smaug. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:51 PM)
|
#185
Originally Posted by joeyjoejoeshabadoo:
It'll also be the first time we see a dwarf army involved in a battle, which should be a sight to behold. |
|
The Tree of Liberty
(03-21-2011, 11:55 PM)
|
#186
Originally Posted by params7:
- Small Battles with Goblins beneath the Misty Mountains. Mostly Gandalf, but Thorin gets in there a bit too. - Small 'battle' (mostly Gandalf) with Goblins and Wargs in the forests. - Battle with Spiders; mostly Bilbo. - Battle with Smaug; very one-sided between Smaug and the Men of Laketown. - Battle of the Fire Armies: Wargs, Goblins, Dwarves, Elves, Men, Bears, Eagles and Bats. In the book Bilbo is knocked out for it, but I would be willing to bet that we see a lot more of it in the film. - Battle with the Necromancer: Only mentioned in the book, this would be the White Council (Gandalf, Saruman, Radagast, Elrond, Galadriel and a ton of other heroes) driving the Necromancer (Sauron) from southern Mirkwood. Since they divided up the movie into two parts and have mentioned that they will switch from Bilbo + Company to focus on what Gandalf is doing during his absences in the book, we might see a battle here too. Of those, the last two are the most likely to be the biggest and the second to last is likely the only one that will approach the epicness of LotR's big battle scenes. |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:56 PM)
|
#187
Originally Posted by disappeared:
![]() ALL ABOARD!!! |
|
Member
(03-21-2011, 11:56 PM)
|
#188
Originally Posted by Edmond Dantès:
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 12:02 AM)
|
#189
Originally Posted by Advance_Alarm:
Edit: He's knocked just after the eagles arrive, but before the arrival of Beorn.
Last edited by Edmond Dantès; 03-22-2011 at 12:09 AM.
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 12:06 AM)
|
#190
So excited for this.
I watched Fellowship and Two Towers a couple of weeks back (planning on watching RotK soon). I still think Fellowship is the best, but I'd forgotten how much I enjoyed Two Towers. This was the theatrical version, too. Helms Deep is such an awesome battle. And Gandalf is boss throughout the whole movie. I still don't understand the whole 'Aragorn falls off a cliff' thing, because it really just seems pointless. I can understand why they put the warg fight in, though. And I think the changes with Frodo/Sam were probably necessary, because chronologically they spend the entirety of the Two Towers walking around in rocks and marshes. |
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 12:18 AM)
|
#191
Originally Posted by Solo:
Overall the movie just in general feels a class ahead of the rest. I'll post my other thoughts on the next two later. PS: How many of you are excited for 2 movies, and how many of you are worried there are 2 movies verses 1 (+ an EE dvd/blu-ray)? |
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:25 AM)
|
#192
Originally Posted by Brettison:
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:31 AM)
|
#193
FOTR is the best but I'm not gonna say it's the only great film of the tree.
Two Towers is pretty damn good too. And Return of the King has it's moments. |
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:38 AM)
|
#194
Fellowship is great, but no greater than the other two. Pretty consistent franchise. I think each one might have been progressively better actually, if only by small amounts. Most people you meet like one of the sequels more than Fellowship..I'd say Fellowship is probably the least liked amongst the majority.
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:40 AM)
|
#195
Originally Posted by Solo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgcoB...eature=related |
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:42 AM)
|
#196
Originally Posted by Evlar:
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:43 AM)
|
#197
Where do you reckon the first movie will end?
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:45 AM)
|
#198
Speaking of timelines, I wonder if anyone's made any fan edits to make TTT and ROTK match their book versions? So you watch all the Aragorn and friends stuff, then all the Frodo and Sam stuff. Would be interesting to watch.
|
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:49 AM)
|
#199
Originally Posted by Secret_Riddle:
On a separate note my rankings change depending upon the theatrical release verse the EE... Theatrical FOTR>ROTK>TTT Extended FOTR>TTT>ROTK I think this is mainly because ROTK already feels the longest for me theatrical wise, and I don't get this big swath of info that I feel is really necessary, cool, or even nice as supplementary material. TTT EE material isn't great by any means, but I think it's more watchable in EE form than ROTK. FOTR EE wise adds the best material, and IMO the most useful. |
|
Member
(03-22-2011, 02:52 AM)
|
#200
I think it's interesting to note that there are a lot more displays of magical ability from Gandalf in The Hobbit when compared to the LotR trilogy. I mean the man straight up smites handfuls of Goblins and lights worgs on fire if memory serves.
I suppose Tolkien wasn't thinking about the limitations imposed on Gandalf as a Maia in Middle Earth when he wrote The Hobbit (hell he probably hadn't even thought up the idea of Maiar yet?). |