|
Member
(03-22-2012, 07:42 PM)
|
#3152
Last edited by gooey kablooie; 03-22-2012 at 07:44 PM.
|
|
Banned
(03-22-2012, 09:00 PM)
|
#3153
I´d highly recommend all of you rss this blog:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/ ![]() ![]() Sorry if mentioned before. |
|
Still Alive
(03-23-2012, 12:53 AM)
|
#3160
|
|
Banned
(03-23-2012, 12:53 AM)
|
#3161
|
|
Member
(03-23-2012, 11:52 AM)
|
#3170
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_Luke |
|
Member
(03-23-2012, 11:55 AM)
|
#3171
|
|
(03-23-2012, 12:10 PM)
|
#3173
Looks like maybe the Beagle Boys from Ducktales?
|
|
(03-23-2012, 05:55 PM)
|
#3183
|
|
Banned
(03-23-2012, 10:32 PM)
|
#3192
|
|
Member
(03-23-2012, 11:29 PM)
|
#3193
|
|
I recently went to my friends house to check out his wii. I was generally impressed. It was larger than I expected though.
(03-24-2012, 11:25 AM)
|
#3198
Guys, its a supernova remnant, a blast of light emanated from the remnant and successive layers of the former star's outer shell which were blasted away ages ago were illuminated one by one, giving off the illusion that it was exploding.
|
|
Still Alive
(03-24-2012, 08:17 PM)
|
#3199
![]() It's also known as 1054 which is the year it was seen by various cultures along with documented accounts of chinese and arab astronomers. What we see are just the remnants of that supernova. Back in 1054AD when it was spotted, it was so bright that it outshone all the nearby stars, and was a huge source of illumination for a 'star'. I don't believe we have actually witnessed a supernova 'live' within our time, 20th/21st century scale. I think the last one was in the 1800s, and that one they observed wasn't even in our galaxy!! If a supernova occurs in our galaxy, we will probably be able to see it with our naked eye. It'll be fun times! It isn't exactly 100% known what happened, because the star was previously unknown before 2002 when they saw this outburst occurring. It was originally thought to be a nova eruption (not supernova). Because of this, it was named Nova Monocerotis (that's the constellation it's in) but that has since changed, because they realized it was actually NOT a typical nova outburst. I remember them saying it was believed to be one of the largest known stars before it erupted, but no one can know for sure. The fluctuation in its light though is what makes it odd, and unlike anything else. Still sort of a mystery.
![]() This is what it looks like now (more or less), which makes you really appreciate that we were able to glimpse such a site before it all expanded away into a 'regular' gassy nebula type view; ![]() ![]() [edit] Damn, hate being at the bottom of the page. :lol |