|
demodded, not denutted
(08-13-2011, 06:29 PM)
|
#52
Terry Goodkind is one of the worst authors I've ever read in my life. I made this huge topic about the Sword of Truth series, and sure enough GAF just exploded with shit that made just how awful he was even more astoundingly clear. The guy is a true warning to mankind, a harbinger of death and destruction unseen since WWII. This guy is the only exception to Godwin's Law: NOT bringing up how he is as bad as the Nazi's means you've left out a point so extremely salient that you've likely lost the debate.
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 06:39 PM)
|
#53
i remember reading an interview from goodkind in which he explained the origins of richard and kahlan. basically, they physically appeared and talked about their problems. (they sat on his shoulders i guess lol) when i saw that, i thought, this guy is either crazy* or he's lying and he thinks that's how the "real authors" get their inspiration.
*he's definitely crazy, but probably not in an imaginary friend kind of way. he leans more to the ax-murderer side. |
|
Aliens ate my babysitter
(08-13-2011, 06:50 PM)
|
#56
He is responsible, though, for one of the most awesome lines in literature (good or bad is up to you).
Quote:
Aslo, Terry's beard and ponytail have transcended being mere parts and have merged into a whole, the Yeard! Also, do not feed the Yeard (rather loan at your local library) |
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 06:51 PM)
|
#57
Originally Posted by icarus-daedelus:
the omen machine has PHILOSOPHY |
|
Everything would be better with more lesbians and basset hounds
(08-13-2011, 06:58 PM)
|
#59
Originally Posted by mjc:
Magnificent OP by the way, Salazar. One for the ages. |
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 07:34 PM)
|
#63
Originally Posted by Amir0x:
I've never read any of these books, but one of my friends bought the first 6 for some reason. It's an easy way to make fun of him now whenever we talk about books. |
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 07:46 PM)
|
#64
True story:
In 2002-3 ish i had read every single book from Terry Brooks (Shannara Series) And I had loved the books and his writing so much i was search desparately for another novel of his to read.... I was perusing B&N at which time I felt that strong twist of the stomach. The one that tickles your sphincter just enough to warn you that If you are not on a toilet in like 30 minutes its ALL over!!! Upon gathering my things in a rush Among the Terry Brooks books was one i hadn't read before... I quickly picked it up and checked it at the cashier and raced home... When i finally ascended the throne i pulled out my PRIZE... and Behold.... what had I done. I had picked up a terry goodkind book thinking it was terry brooks... I TRIED reading it... i REALLY Tried but alas It was soo boring i threw it away... What a waste of college money. |
|
Everything would be better with more lesbians and basset hounds
(08-13-2011, 07:53 PM)
|
#66
Ami's Goodkind hate thread was one of my favorite ever threads on GAF. I only hope that this one can live up to it.
Originally Posted by wrowa:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 08:25 PM)
|
#67
Originally Posted by icarus-daedelus:
|
|
card-carrying scientician
(08-13-2011, 08:27 PM)
|
#68
Goodkind would have been a genius if halfway through SoT he revealed that Richard was the villain all along, and the rest of the series followed a series of heroes trying to stop this delusional psychopath who believes he's a hero.
Last edited by The Technomancer; 08-13-2011 at 08:39 PM.
|
|
FABULOUSLY
DIXI QUID QUID BEAR BEAR (08-13-2011, 08:31 PM)
|
#69
Originally Posted by The_Technomancer:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 08:31 PM)
|
#70
Will buy this when it comes to Kindle. Sword of Truth series was my first series ever (just started reading last year) and I enjoyed it. Maybe because I had no previous reading experience, but I liked it a lot. Curious to see where Omen Machine takes the story.
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 09:42 PM)
|
#71
Originally Posted by Husker86:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 10:23 PM)
|
#72
Originally Posted by mrowa:
Originally Posted by icarus-daedelus:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 10:53 PM)
|
#76
Originally Posted by Husker86:
Tommie Frazier is my favorite college QB of all time, by the way. |
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 11:01 PM)
|
#77
Originally Posted by JasonUresti:
|
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 11:16 PM)
|
#78
Originally Posted by thomaser:
NB: This ties in with his spluttering disgust for liberals, peace-protesters, and so on. The acute sense of these people that they are "doing the right thing" sets off alarm bells for Terry. This doesn't seem enormously persuasive to me, because Jagang [vastly muscled leader of the anti-Magic army the Imperial Order, fond of greasy chicken and twirling his moustache, able to "dream-walk"], at any rate, seemed extremely, jovially conscious that he was a bad motherfucker. Even more so Darken Rahl, Demmin Nass [the paedophile who gets his testes fed to him], and Drefan. Tobias Brogan [honcho of the Blood of the Fold, another anti-magic inquisition] seems the one to whom it is most applicable, but he is also one of the most tedious villains Goodkind has managed to create. ["FILTHY STREGANICHA, NO I WON'T COME TO BED, I'M GOING TO STAY UP AND PACE ANGRILY."] And Richard is, like you say, possessed by a bizarre moral certainty. Part of this is forced by the plot. As the Seeker, exerciser of the power of the Sword of Truth, Richard has to be minutely, unwaveringly certain that someone deserves to get sliced up in order for him to be able to whack them with the sword. He has a loophole if he turns the sword white (which he does with increasing frequency through the series), but in general, he is functionally bereft of ethical nuance. And he is, you'd better believe, the motherfucking exception. How does he know he is morally perfect ? He fucking knows. Shut the fuck up.
Originally Posted by Verendus:
Last edited by Salazar; 08-13-2011 at 11:27 PM.
|
|
hot hot hanuman-on-man action
(08-13-2011, 11:24 PM)
|
#79
Originally Posted by Husker86:
“A reader lives a thousand lives before he dies. The man who never reads lives only one.” — A Dance With Dragons, by George R. R. Martin |
|
Member
(08-13-2011, 11:58 PM)
|
#80
Pat's Fantasy Hotlist dug up a quote from Mystar, a friend of Goodkind who has been defending him on the internet for years.
Originally Posted by Mystar:
It's fairly certain, I think, that Goodkind shares this view of his work and of its principal characters. I think the books are sincerely intended to be read as the passage of a morally immaculate man (Richard) through an unclean and difficult world.
Last edited by Salazar; 08-14-2011 at 12:09 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:23 AM)
|
#82
Originally Posted by icarus-daedelus:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.terrygoodkind.com/resources-faq.shtml
Last edited by Salazar; 08-14-2011 at 12:28 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:29 AM)
|
#83
I read the first six books when I was in high school. And they were so bad. I had been reading Wheel of Time, and noticed how so many Sword of Truth elements were pretty much stolen from WoT. But I kept reading anyway. Never thought about all the rape and other stupid shit.
Looking back, I actually really liked Faith of the Fallen. It was the only one I enjoyed. Never started Pillars of Creation though. |
|
Junior Member
(08-14-2011, 12:32 AM)
|
#85
This is why you see something like George R R Martin's A song of Ice and Fire always failing by comparison, why it is still sitting on the shelf, why the screen play has had to have been rewritten several times already, and it is still sitting there... It has no true hero's and no honor for life... People want to feel good about their heros, they want Heros, they can believe in!!!
lol. |
|
card-carrying scientician
(08-14-2011, 12:33 AM)
|
#86
Quote:
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:40 AM)
|
#88
Originally Posted by scoot3r:
I no longer take the books seriously, and I find them pretty vile in a whole lot of respects, but I am glad they exist. They are stimulatingly terrible. Goodkind has a tincture of narrative wherewithal: he is a catastrophically bad writer for the most part, but he is not (whatever I said in the OP) a entirely untalented man. Just a below-average hack who decided to use his meagre powers to advance Objectivism and a whole bunch of nauseating sexual, social, and political attitudes. |
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:41 AM)
|
#89
Originally Posted by Salazar:
Wow, this writer sucks but that is like 10 million man points to that Richard guy. And I don't know how anybody would be able to root for that Kahlan girl as a heroine after the kind of fuck-over she tried to pull on him with his own brother. |
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:41 AM)
|
#90
Originally Posted by Salazar:
I guess they do have sex with demons, but Goodkind has nothing on Scott Bakker there. Bakker's rape demons and aliens with black semen and glistening cocks top anything Goodkind has done. |
|
Junior Member
(08-14-2011, 12:41 AM)
|
#91
I was really into this series in high school. It wasn't too "fantasy-like" for my taste, and didn't seem offensively bad for me. I got up to Chainfire before I finally stopped because Goodkind got even more blatantly obvious w/ his preaching in chapters upon chapters with little to no plot progression and Richard being an annoying whiny emo twat.
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:46 AM)
|
#92
Originally Posted by Basileus777:
And Jagang was just a super powerful dude. There's no shame in coming out second best to a cube of muscle with black eyes who can invade dreams.
Last edited by Salazar; 08-14-2011 at 12:49 AM.
|
|
Everything would be better with more lesbians and basset hounds
(08-14-2011, 12:49 AM)
|
#93
Originally Posted by AlphaDragoon:
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:51 AM)
|
#94
Originally Posted by icarus-daedelus:
Ordinarily, she and Richard weren't able to have sex, because her Confessor powers would be released at the point of orgasm and Richard would become a vegetable. Shota (milf witch, fancies Richard but thinks he is dangerous, keeps threatening to kill them or any offspring they conceive) engineered some magical way for them to fuck. |
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:53 AM)
|
#95
Originally Posted by Computer:
It's not entirely fair, a lot of those quotes are either out of context and make sense in context, or aren't as stupid as they make them sound. I do have plenty of issues with Goodkind, certainly -- I strongly disagree with his conservative, Objectivist philosophy for instance, and as the series gets farther in the Objectivism becomes more and more blatant (that "pacifists are evil" book was so messed up...), and I do think that all of his books could stand to be significantly shortened (I like plenty of long fantasy books, but his... they could be shorter for sure.), and yeah he does have some issues with his female characters certainly (though many of the situations do make sense, not all of them do, and they're a bit too frequent to not make it obvious that he has issues with women...), but... no, I don't entirely hate his books. His writing's okay, and particularly earlier on I liked the story and characters. Not all of his female characters are bad, Kahlan's a good character most of the time for instance, and there are other good ones as well. I liked the fantasy series that the first four books make up. It does get a lot harder to like Richard once you hit stuff like him killing pacifists though. And while I read almost all of the series, I finally gave up on the second to last Sword of Truth book, and don't have the last one... though honestly, it was probably the "Kahlan is MIA for most of two books" thing that finally did in my interest in the series, as much as anything... So yeah, not sure if I'll read this or not. Maybe, if I get around to finishing Sword of Truth first, sometime.
Originally Posted by Morn:
I mean, Martin is a better writer than Goodkind, certainly. I would say that. But Goodkind's not all bad.
Originally Posted by Computer:
Originally Posted by Salazar:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Basileus777:
Quote:
Last edited by A Black Falcon; 08-14-2011 at 01:06 AM.
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 12:58 AM)
|
#96
Cheers, A Black Falcon. I agree with most of what you suggest.
I concede that lifting quotes from Goodkind's books makes them seem perhaps more ridiculous than they are, but I think it is a) a necessary critical process b) not making them substantially more silly than they already are. I don't asperse Goodkind because I like Martin; I think the work that the Westeros boards have done, at the vanguard of the anti-Goodkind internet movement, gives too strong an impression that criticism of Goodkind is motivated by reverence for Martin.
Last edited by Salazar; 08-14-2011 at 01:02 AM.
|
|
FABULOUSLY
DIXI QUID QUID BEAR BEAR (08-14-2011, 12:59 AM)
|
#97
Originally Posted by Basileus777:
|
|
Member
(08-14-2011, 01:26 AM)
|
#99
Originally Posted by Darkness:
I never got far enough into Legend of the Seeker to see a mriswith. ![]() These are serpentine corrupted ex-Wizards, who wear chameleonic cloaks and fight with tuning forks called "yabree". They call Richard "skin brother" because he took a cloak off a mriswith he killed. He was noted for this feat, and it made a Sister of the Light named Pasha all the more desperate to get naked with him.
Last edited by Salazar; 08-14-2011 at 01:31 AM.
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(08-14-2011, 01:33 AM)
|
#100
Originally Posted by Darkness:
Who cares if Terry Goodkind is one of the worst authors alive today? If you like him, you like him. Fuck the po-lice. |