|
Banned
(09-07-2011, 11:15 PM)
|
#201
Originally Posted by Gully State:
I'm just saying you're not doing the argument any favours by using a bad image like that. Get a direct screenshot otherwise it just looks like you're trying to skew it. |
|
|
|
(09-07-2011, 11:15 PM)
|
#202
This is one of those cursed articles that make you dumber after reading it! Don't think I can be fooled so easily!
|
|
Member
(09-07-2011, 11:19 PM)
|
#203
Posted from the "I need a PC thread" as it was linked in there:
Silly article with a divisive premise to get attention/hits/$. Standardization already occurs in architecture, you don't need it with hardware. That's on the hardware manufacturers to get drivers to optimize the games. The whole point of the PC is that it's open. That's true in hardware, software, games, input devices, displays, and networking tools. They did standardize the Gaming PC, it's called PS3 and X-Box. To have standardized hardware would turn it into a console. If you want that standardization to be something devs bank on, you need standardized software/OS as well. This guy is on crack. |
|
Member
(09-07-2011, 11:31 PM)
|
#207
PCs do not lack power at all. At worst if and when consoles can use top of the line computer parts with maybe some features not available at PC, PCs will be outclassed for a year if that. This doesn't look to be the case now due to power consumptions rising, so consoles will probably use old equipment.
The problem with PCs is that developers don't often develop with them in mind rather than PCs suffering due to being weaker (they are far more powerful) or suffering due to consoles being easier to optimise due to being closed platforms. Standardization as an issue with PCs has more to do IMO with older PCs being available and selling while with the console that is not necessarily a case. So you can get out a console exclusive that can run on the console no problems while when it comes to PC it might run good on some PCs while the older ones might have problems. Though in this generation old PCs play console ports usually much better than consoles themselves. Anyway the problem is that a developer might target the console while in the case of the PC it might target both the older and newer PCs and make a game powerful enough for both. This problem is faced for a short period of time when consoles are new, and it isn't very important. And at that period of time you will probably get Games that target the stronger PC systems if developers care enough. But then again my 9800GTX can run pretty much everything somewhat adequately and others maxed out and it is old. Not as old as consoles of course. So... PC gaming might be outclassed a year at times. I don't see this new generation of consoles outclassing it at all hardware wise for the reason I mentioned. So the problems with PC as far as graphical fidelity is concerned is not a lack of power or standardization but that Games are designed based on running on old console hardware, and almost overwhelmingly first designed with that in mind. Standardization... is relatively very unimportant. PCs are most of the time pretty damn powerful and keep getting pretty damn powerful and impressively so in comparison to consoles.
Last edited by Reuenthal; 09-07-2011 at 11:41 PM.
|
|
(09-07-2011, 11:32 PM)
|
#208
Originally Posted by f0rk:
|
|
Member
(09-07-2011, 11:36 PM)
|
#209
I don't believe the diffference between console and pc versions of multiplats is as big as some people make it out to be, but it is noticable (though there are some were it is large).
In regards to controllers, the 360 controller is definitely the better input in certain games. You'd have to be crazy to play Just Cause 2 with m+kb if you have a 360 controller. It's even better in certain fps due to the comfort factor (eg Crysis 2). Just finished playing the Hard Reset demo with the 360 controller. The mouse has situations where it's better too of course..like all Valve games. edit: and yeah, author is a troll. Why is Kotaku publishing blogs as new stories??
Last edited by NBtoaster; 09-07-2011 at 11:40 PM.
|
|
Member
(09-07-2011, 11:44 PM)
|
#212
Originally Posted by Castor Krieg:
|
|
Member
(09-08-2011, 12:19 AM)
|
#217
Originally Posted by bandresen:
So it's a very nice example of how much more pc hardware can do. Troll backfire?
Originally Posted by ghst:
|
|
Corporate Apologist
(09-08-2011, 12:21 AM)
|
#218
Originally Posted by bandresen:
Also, the great thing about DirrctX being a software abstraction layer, is that as the hardware changes, the software will still work. If you wrote right to the hardware, major changes would break past software.
Last edited by Drkirby; 09-08-2011 at 12:28 AM.
|
|
(09-08-2011, 01:26 AM)
|
#220
Originally Posted by Reallink:
I typed Stalker+ controller and found of five forums only a few people being snarky, the rest where trying to help people who wanted to get the controller working with the game. but teh thruth is for some games, M/KB is better. but the beauty of PC games is that you can choose whatever control scheme you desire. |
|
Junior Member
(09-08-2011, 02:21 AM)
|
#223
This should be pitched somewhere with a big 'mainstream' audience.
Would you rather spend about $3000 dollars on a 'gaming laptop'. Or spend a few hours to learn how to build a gaming rig of much more power for $500 to $1000? And might just be my asian background, but it's a lot easier to convince the parents that building a gaming pc is cool vs getting a new console. I need a 9800gtx cuz... school. yeah. |
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 07:59 PM)
|
#224
Hey look, Kotaku themselves just told everyone what everyone but this stupid guy realized about the Razer Blade:
http://kotaku.com/5885068/razer-blade-the-kotaku-review Hint: it's disappointing in performance, overpriced, has shitty battery life, and the extra LCD is completely useless. |
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 08:18 PM)
|
#227
I thought it was a fully relevant follow-up to what this entire thread was about in the first place.
First, ridiculous hyperbole and speculation by the guy about how the Razer Blade will be some magical savior for a platform that doesn't need a savior. Everyone knows he's totally full of shit and swallowing PR wholesale without checking his information with anyone who actually knows anything. Then...oh hey...look...review of said thing. It sucks. |
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 08:18 PM)
|
#228
|
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 08:18 PM)
|
#229
|
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 08:23 PM)
|
#231
Master race needs to calm the fuck down. The guy makes some interesting points. You don't have to agree with someone to recognise that they've articulated a coherent argument.
I guess if you're not willing to bow down to the almighty PC your opinion is useless on gaf. Edit: Shit, hosed for not checking the dates.
Last edited by AShep; 02-15-2012 at 08:32 PM.
|
|
Member
(02-15-2012, 08:26 PM)
|
#233
This is an old thread. I deliberately bumped this thread because it was the ultimate demonstration that this guy is full of shit and is talking about a platform that he seriously knows nothing about, whatsoever.
|
|
Banned
(02-15-2012, 08:30 PM)
|
#234
Also, I thought people were going to start being banned for using the term "master race" in conjunction with PC gaming. What happened with that? I was looking forward to seeing if I was right that it was most often used as a pejorative. |