|
Member
(11-07-2011, 01:47 PM)
|
#151
Originally Posted by BertramCooper:
|
|
|
|
Banned
(11-07-2011, 01:58 PM)
|
#152
Originally Posted by GoldenEye 007:
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 02:59 PM)
|
#153
Originally Posted by Scott Paterno:
You're not the goddamn prosecutor of this case, Scooter! Its not up to you to decide if there is enough evidence to prove something happened and whose at fault. You had a legitamite accusation with a DIRECT EYEWITNESS statement and your wrinkled decrepit father had an obligation to report it to more than just his boss. Police take reports on everything. Why don't you let THEM decide whether to take it seriously or not.
Last edited by JoeBoy101; 11-07-2011 at 03:03 PM.
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 03:20 PM)
|
#157
Originally Posted by JoeBoy101:
http://www.postgazette.com/pg/11311/1188148-298.stm |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 03:26 PM)
|
#159
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon:
EDIT: Hang on, reading fail. Lemme look at it again. EDIT2: I dunno, Hari. I see your argument, but strikes me as a weak one. That's like seeing a rape and reporting it to the mayor because he oversees the police department of a city. Perhaps he had that in mind, but given it happened in 2002, Paterno would have to be blind to miss the inaction in the near 10 years between then and now.
Last edited by JoeBoy101; 11-07-2011 at 03:31 PM.
|
|
I got grudge sucked!
(11-07-2011, 03:35 PM)
|
#161
Originally Posted by BertramCooper:
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 03:40 PM)
|
#163
Originally Posted by Hari Seldon:
Man, this is seriously making me relive my enitre childhood in State College. |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 03:41 PM)
|
#164
Originally Posted by samus i am:
But he knew what was going on, to say "hey, he reported something so he's clean" is bullshit, but that's what the sport media will say |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 03:42 PM)
|
#165
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 03:49 PM)
|
#166
Originally Posted by Dude Abides:
For me, Mrs Sandusky was the nice woman who washed my pants after I took a spill all over some dog crap in the back yard. Despite there being a pantsless young Asian boy in the house, wasn't like Mr. Sandusky was putting the moves on me. I'm flabbergastedm confused and horrifed to be honest. |
|
Harriet Tubman'd
(11-07-2011, 04:05 PM)
|
#167
I still don't get how Paterno is at fault. He reported the information given to him to the proper people within the College, and as far as I know, we don't really know what happened after that. For all we know, he could have been told that a proper investigation had taken place and nothing of the sort was found. How is he supposed to know that his superiors are shitty enough people to cover up child molestation? He certainly could have followed up intensely, but it's easy to make those types of judgements after the fact...
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:10 PM)
|
#168
Originally Posted by Ken Masters:
|
|
(11-07-2011, 04:29 PM)
|
#169
Paterno really should have followed up a bit more, but I wouldn't say he is at particular fault for not resolving this. He didn't see a crime take place, but rather heard something second-hand. He wasn't there and doesn't know what did or didn't happen or whether this is some false accusation, so he reported what he heard to people in charge of handling these things.
It is the graduate assistant who should have been more vigilant IMO. He should have found out who the boy was, gone to talk the mother, and gotten the police involved (though I can see even being witness to something like that being pretty traumatizing). That said, neither of them are at fault compared to the higher ups who tried to cover things up and then lied about it. Makes me sad for humanity when I read about this :( |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:32 PM)
|
#171
Originally Posted by samus i am:
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 04:33 PM)
|
#172
The thing that makes me stop is this:
Joe Paterno is a football coach, and not a criminal investigator. If he kept pressing for investigation or inquiring about it, at what point does it become interference? At what point would law enforcement usually say, "Chill, joe. We got this." I will admit that having been raised from ages 6 - 13 in State College during the 80's, I have had a very healthy dose of the JoePa Kool-Aid.
Last edited by ChiTownBuffalo; 11-07-2011 at 04:37 PM.
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:33 PM)
|
#173
It's been reported in The Daily Collegian (student newspaper) that Penn State administration is using insurance money set aside for lawsuits to cover the costs of the legal fees they are paying. There was uproar from alumni and students alike when we heard the uni was paying those fees so now they are on damage control with that.
The Daily Collegian is filled with letters to the editors of disgust from the situation. It is almost unanimous that everyone involved needs to go, including some who want the president, Spanier to go as well. It is a grim day on campus. I'd rather the AD be caught paying players. |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:35 PM)
|
#174
Originally Posted by Dude Abides:
Sorry for the double |
|
aka andydumi
(11-07-2011, 04:41 PM)
|
#175
Originally Posted by Schmitty:
My question is who is the graduate that witnessed it, and why did he/she not say anything to the police when nothing happened internally after weeks or months or even years? |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:43 PM)
|
#176
Originally Posted by Schmitty:
Edit:
Originally Posted by AndyD:
|
|
(11-07-2011, 04:43 PM)
|
#177
Originally Posted by Ninja Scooter:
but all of that is football, not really related here... i don't think he should be fired, but if he was better for this than for his football record... What I don't understand is how creepy adults are given so much alone time with kids. I also think the wife must have at least had some suspicions if not outright known about her husband. Supposing she is in the house, isn't is suspicious her husband is sneaking out of bed anytime the kids are sleeping in the basement? I don't like to prejudge people and consider myself really, really open-minded, but when an adult man wants to spend a lot of time alone with little kids there is no way that isn't gonna raise a red flag for me. Although I probably would publicly raise suspicions I'm at least going to keep more alert and look for any other signs. And I wouldn't be hesitant to keep and eye out even if the person I suspected was a friend or family member. |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:44 PM)
|
#178
Originally Posted by AndyD:
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 04:46 PM)
|
#179
Paterno needs to be run out of town. Yea, he only heard the info second hand, but he allowed this predator on campus until 2009. He let the guy coach kids until 2009. That's unconscionable. I can see him not wanting to call the cops on his friend of 3 decades, but he heard the guy was violating young boys. And he continued to give him access to young boys.
I respected Paterno a lot, and it does not make me happy to say this.
Last edited by diffusionx; 11-07-2011 at 04:50 PM.
|
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 04:52 PM)
|
#181
Originally Posted by BertramCooper:
|
|
Banned
(11-07-2011, 04:57 PM)
|
#182
Originally Posted by Schmitty:
Remember, the first public accusations against Sandusky came out in 1998. Then, surprise!, he resigns the next year. When the 2002 accusations arose, you mean the God of Happy Valley couldn't put 2 + 2 together? Sandusky was a potential candidate for my alma mater's (Virginia) open head coaching job in the late 90s and word on the street is that it was Paterno himself who warned us off. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 05:13 PM)
|
#183
![]() I bet they wish he would stop wearing Penn State apparel. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 05:40 PM)
|
#190
Originally Posted by lush:
Just because this happened doesn't mean Paterno all of the sudden ripped off his rubber mask and turned into a monster. Joe Paterno is still a good person, he's just not the paragon of coaching perfection everyone else made him out to be. At worst, he's self interested. Jerry Sandusky was his friend for I'm assuming 30 or so years. So when he heard about the first allegations back in 98 he reported to the police and the University authorities. Why didn't he get more into it? Would you want to fully delve into what sort of monster your friend/colleague of 30 years is? By knowing less, and completing due diligence of reporting, Joe gets to play both sides, which is totally human. He reports a crime, and he also protects himself. That's completely understandable. And from what is coming out, he pretty much kept other schools from hiring Snadusky, which explains the bitterness from Sandusky. Yeah, I wished he woulda done more. But, I can't say I wouldn't have had the same conflict.
Last edited by ChiTownBuffalo; 11-07-2011 at 05:44 PM.
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 05:43 PM)
|
#191
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
Paterno may have covered his ass criminally but morally he is just as fucked up as the rest of the people covering this up. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 05:46 PM)
|
#192
Originally Posted by bigtroyjon:
I am saying that in situations like this, with the length and history of the type of relationship Paterno and Sandusky had, it wouldn't be as black/white as people on the outside see it or want it to be. |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 05:49 PM)
|
#193
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 05:51 PM)
|
#194
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
|
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 05:53 PM)
|
#195
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
We're not talking about Sandusky giving players bundles of cash. We're not talking about Sandusky doing lines of coke with the QB or whatever. That would make Paterno an asshole, but all these coaches are. We're talking about Paterno continuing to give Sandusky access to young boys years after it was obvious that he was a predator. If JoePa wanted to stop Sandusky's BS foundation work that was really a front for molestation, he could have. He didn't, so Paterno deserves the criticism he is getting. Paterno is a very, very bad person. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 05:54 PM)
|
#196
Originally Posted by bigtroyjon:
All I said, was that JoePa's action or inaction, was colored by his relationship with Sandusky. I didn't say it was OK, but I'm also saying that it doesn't make JoePa a monster on Sandusky's level. |
|
Member
(11-07-2011, 06:01 PM)
|
#198
Originally Posted by ChiTownBuffalo:
And it's not about something as binary as Paterno being a "monster" or not, or even a "bad person" or not. I don't really know what the official criteria is for "bad people". But ignoring compelling evidence that your old friend is a child rapist is BAD. Really bad, and not in a particularly "understandable" sense. If it's not a black and white issue, then it's a very very very very dark gray, at least. |
|
Either I made up lies about the Boston Bomber or I fell for someone else's crap. Either way, I have absolutely no credibility and you should never pay any attention to anything I say, no matter what the context. Perm me if I claim to be an insider
(11-07-2011, 06:08 PM)
|
#200
Originally Posted by Joe Shlabotnik:
|