BoobPhysics101
Banned
(03-22-2012, 10:15 AM)
#1501

Originally Posted by kameha5th: View Post
Do not even consider buying this card if you already have either the:

GTX 570, GTX 580, and the GTX 590.
Why the fuck not? This thing OC'd vs my GTX 570 OC'd = 40-60% faster. Considering I got my GTX 570 for free, selling and getting this seems like a no brainer.
-SD-
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:16 AM)

-SD-'s Avatar
#1502

GTX 680 vs. water cooled 580.

Newegg TV: EVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 SLI & Triple Monitor Benchmarks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEPL1SilkJ8
Last edited by -SD-; 03-22-2012 at 10:20 AM.
derFeef
lil' bit tasty
(03-22-2012, 10:17 AM)

derFeef's Avatar
#1503

Speaking of triple monitor, still only possible with SLI?
artist
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:18 AM)

artist's Avatar
#1504

Originally Posted by derFeef: View Post
Speaking of triple monitor, still only possible with SLI?
Single card can drive upto 4 displays. 4K ready also.
DieH@rd
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:21 AM)

DieH@rd's Avatar
#1505

Originally Posted by derFeef: View Post
Speaking of triple monitor, still only possible with SLI?
nope, 1 card finally supports gaming with 3 montiors [and in 3d].
Brad Grenz
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:22 AM)

Brad Grenz's Avatar
#1506

Originally Posted by DeFiBkIlLeR: View Post
When are the 660 cards(or the equivalent to this gens 560 range)being launched..?
Who knows. I think the chip being launched as the 680 was originally slated to be the 660.
Unknown Soldier
Watches anime on Wikipedia
(03-22-2012, 10:25 AM)

Unknown Soldier's Avatar
#1507

Kepler is beating the Radeon HD 7970 with a narrow memory bus. When Nvidia lets the Kepler with 512-bit memory bus out of the cage, it's going to be a slaughter.

I still can't max out GTX 470 SLI in many of my games using Core i7-950 (Bloomfield) OCed to 4 ghz. I would need a hugely OCed Ivy Bridge just to keep my GTX 470 SLI cards busy, so I can't imagine what kind of CPU you need for Kepler SLI to keep those beasts fed.
derFeef
lil' bit tasty
(03-22-2012, 10:26 AM)

derFeef's Avatar
#1508

Originally Posted by DieH@rd: View Post
nope, 1 card finally supports gaming with 3 montiors [and in 3d].
Sweet, that was always why I went with AMD, I have 3 monitors - 1x24" for gaming, 1x27" for working/designing, and a second 24" for browsing. So this would work now too?
PowerK
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 10:32 AM)

PowerK's Avatar
#1509

nVIDIA just released an official ForceWare v301.10 WHQL for GTX680.

Release note : http://us.download.nvidia.com/Window...ease-notes.pdf
Last edited by PowerK; 03-22-2012 at 10:37 AM.
Moaradin
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:35 AM)

Moaradin's Avatar
#1510

I hope the 670 or 660 comes out soon after. I need to upgrade from my 460 pretty badly, but I think $400 will be my limit.
BoobPhysics101
Banned
(03-22-2012, 10:43 AM)
#1511

Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier: View Post
Kepler is beating the Radeon HD 7970 with a narrow memory bus. When Nvidia lets the Kepler with 512-bit memory bus out of the cage, it's going to be a slaughter.

I still can't max out GTX 470 SLI in many of my games using Core i7-950 (Bloomfield) OCed to 4 ghz. I would need a hugely OCed Ivy Bridge just to keep my GTX 470 SLI cards busy, so I can't imagine what kind of CPU you need for Kepler SLI to keep those beasts fed.
Nah. OC'd 2500k @ 4.5 Ghz is more than enough for 470 SLI, 580 SLI, or even 680 SLI. Hell, 5 Ghz 2500k is probably the max needed for 680 SLI. CPU won't bottleneck, games just aren't pushing a 470 SLI setup enough.
BoobPhysics101
Banned
(03-22-2012, 10:47 AM)
#1512

Originally Posted by PowerK: View Post
nVIDIA just released an official ForceWare v301.10 WHQL for GTX680.

Release note : http://us.download.nvidia.com/Window...ease-notes.pdf
Damn it, I just upgraded to 300.99.

Ok, here's the INF for 301.10 so it can work on all cards (including GTX 680 and GTX 5xx series)

http://www.mediafire.com/?v9iidaz8zu7cgp7 X64

http://www.mediafire.com/?esiqj4oz355tg3z X86
dr_rus
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:47 AM)

dr_rus's Avatar
#1513

Originally Posted by artist: View Post
How did Nvidia manage to triple core count in such a small die? They ditched the hotclocks! Yes, probably half of the 3d geek world already knows this answer (hello dr_rus) but what else did Nvidia change?
Hi artist. Yeah, I knew all of this. That's why I've said "one of the reasons" to BoobPhysics. 680 sitting in my case right now says hi to you too. A nice card but as I've said earlier it should cost $400 at max, not $500.
artist
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:48 AM)

artist's Avatar
#1514

Originally Posted by Brad Grenz: View Post
Who knows. I think the chip being launched as the 680 was originally slated to be the 660.
6 SMX
1152 SPs
96 TMUs
24 ROPs
6 Polymorph engines
192-bit 6Gbps GDDR5
May
$299


Originally Posted by dr_rus: View Post
Hi artist. Yeah, I knew all of this. That's why I've said "one of the reasons" to BoobPhysics. 680 sitting in my case right now says hi to you too. A nice card but as I've said earlier it should cost $400 at max, not $500.
Wiggle room. Pics?
dsk1210
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 10:50 AM)

dsk1210's Avatar
#1515

They have added adaptive vertical sync, I asked andrew from nvidia about that ages ago, so glad to see it has been added.

Rock solid 60 vertical sync on, the minute it drops below the v-sync will drop off allowing the frame rate to stay higher but introducing screen tear, a great option to have for heavy performance gaming.

Bayonetta on the 360 used this smart v-sync and kept the game nice and fluid for the most part.

Along with the new AA method I am keenly anticipating the 685/690



Dave
Last edited by dsk1210; 03-22-2012 at 10:54 AM.
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
(03-22-2012, 10:54 AM)

LabouredSubterfuge's Avatar
#1516

Originally Posted by dsk1210: View Post
They have added adaptive vertical sync, I asked andrew from nvidia about that ages ago, so glad to see it has been added.

Rock solid 60 vertical sync on, the minute it drops below the v-sync will drop off allowing the frame rate to stay higher but introducing screen tear, a great option to have for heavy performance gaming.

Bayonetta on the 360 used this smart v-sync and kept the game nice and fluid for the most part.



Dave
Oh sweet. Do you think they'll be allowing this for the GTX5xx series through new drivers?
BoobPhysics101
Banned
(03-22-2012, 10:56 AM)
#1517

Originally Posted by LabouredSubterfuge: View Post
Oh sweet. Do you think they'll be allowing this for the GTX5xx series through new drivers?
If you have Nvidia Inspector, Adaptive Vsync is working NOW on 300.99 and 301.10. Works beautifully too, just like SMART Vsync in Rage.
dsk1210
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 11:00 AM)

dsk1210's Avatar
#1518

Originally Posted by BoobPhysics101: View Post
If you have Nvidia Inspector, Adaptive Vsync is working NOW on 300.99 and 301.10. Works beautifully too, just like SMART Vsync in Rage.
Perfect, going to try that out right now :)


Dave
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:02 AM)

LabouredSubterfuge's Avatar
#1519

Originally Posted by BoobPhysics101: View Post
If you have Nvidia Inspector, Adaptive Vsync is working NOW on 300.99 and 301.10. Works beautifully too, just like SMART Vsync in Rage.
SWEEEEEEET.
Sethos
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:06 AM)

Sethos's Avatar
#1520

Man, this is why I love Nvidia - Even their drivers is something you can look forward to.

Still torn on whether to upgrade. My 580 is a great card but honestly, it's struggling at 2560x1600 with just a bit of AA. However, I know I'll regret it when the GK110 is out in a few months, plus the 2GB is really putting me off.

Although, I'm going SLI, so it doesn't have to be top of the line either .... Decisions.
dsk1210
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 11:14 AM)

dsk1210's Avatar
#1521

how do I use a modified nvidia.inf file? never had to do that before but will not let me install unless I use the modded file.

Ignore this, just copy the modified ini file into the extracted folder with the display properties folder

Dave
Last edited by dsk1210; 03-22-2012 at 11:19 AM.
DSN2K
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:16 AM)

DSN2K's Avatar
#1522

ATI need to drop their prices, 7800 series is hugely over priced
Kaako
Felium Defensor
(03-22-2012, 11:17 AM)

Kaako's Avatar
#1523

GK110 has to have 4GB DDR5 at this point, right? Just imagine a pair of them monsters in SLI...mmm yes.
Mr Swine
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:29 AM)

Mr Swine's Avatar
#1524

Looks like I will wait for the next gen graphics card :) my GTX 580 looks like it will last another year :D
dsk1210
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 11:29 AM)

dsk1210's Avatar
#1525

Just tested Alan Wake at 1080p maxed and the adaptive v-sync is working fantastic, no judder and just a slight amount of tearing when things get hectic. Very pleased. :)


Dave
derFeef
lil' bit tasty
(03-22-2012, 11:30 AM)

derFeef's Avatar
#1526

Dave.
BoobPhysics101
Banned
(03-22-2012, 11:31 AM)
#1527

Originally Posted by derFeef: View Post
Dave.
I'm afraid I can't let you do that, Dave.

Dave
1-D_FTW
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:40 AM)

1-D_FTW's Avatar
#1528

Wow. Didn't know the bit about adaptive v-sync. I'll have to try it.

Originally Posted by amstradcpc: View Post
Minimums in general ( except for Battlefield 3 ) are better for HD 7970 which i consider a better architecture with more potential and much more elegant. This plus long idle tdp advantage that also is important if your leave your rig on at nights...
At the risk of sounding like a jerk, if 10 - 15 watts is a huge deal to you, why don't you just put your computer to sleep at night and save real energy?
Hazaro
relies on auto-aim
(03-22-2012, 11:41 AM)

Hazaro's Avatar
#1529

Looks pretty decent. Some good coolers coming under $550 is ok.
See where the OC potential lies and how min frames hold up. Pretty nice for the 660Ti.
Too bad AMD isn't being competitive, this should have been $400.
Originally Posted by DSN2K: View Post
ATI need to drop their prices, 7800 series is hugely over priced
It is, but compared to what competition?
artist
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:42 AM)

artist's Avatar
#1530

OP is updated.

Fallout-NL
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:44 AM)

Fallout-NL's Avatar
#1531

Originally Posted by Hazaro: View Post
Looks pretty decent. Some good coolers coming under $550 is ok.
See where the OC potential lies and how min frames hold up. Pretty nice for the 660Ti.
Too bad AMD isn't being competitive, this should have been $400.

It is, but compared to what competition?

Well, it's not that huge a leap to the 680.


Also, eh. If you're referring to the 680 as the 660Ti, what is Nvidia actually going to be selling as the 660?
Last edited by Fallout-NL; 03-22-2012 at 11:47 AM.
amstradcpc
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:52 AM)

amstradcpc's Avatar
#1532

Originally Posted by 1-D_FTW: View Post
Wow. Didn't know the bit about adaptive v-sync. I'll have to try it.



At the risk of sounding like a jerk, if 10 - 15 watts is a huge deal to you, why don't you just put your computer to sleep at night and save real energy?
Is a huge deal for the life of the GPU.
1-D_FTW
Member
(03-22-2012, 11:53 AM)

1-D_FTW's Avatar
#1533

Originally Posted by Fallout-NL: View Post
Well, it's not that huge a leap to the 680.


Also, eh. If you're referring to the 680 as the 660Ti, what is Nvidia actually going to be selling as the 660?
Hopefully something that's been intentionally gimped with clock speeds and can be easily over-ridden to get a lot of the performance back.

Originally Posted by amstradcpc: View Post
Is a huge deal for the life of the GPU.
My GTX 460 barely runs much over ambient temps when it's sitting at long idle. I don't think 15 - 20 watts (with a fan running on it) is going to affect life one bit. It's nice and all that AMD is putting a zero state in for when the monitor is off and the computer is running, but if anyone is truly interested in saving electricity, the sleep button on the keyboard is a whole lot better. Takes 3 second to come out of sleep and according to my Kill-a-watt, my entire system uses 1 - 2 watts while sleeping.
Last edited by 1-D_FTW; 03-22-2012 at 11:56 AM.
artist
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:07 PM)

artist's Avatar
#1534

Load temps are going to effect your GPU life more than the wattage consumed.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
(03-22-2012, 12:12 PM)

LiquidMetal14's Avatar
#1535

Really liking the results here. Leaning towards NVIDIA for my next upgrade.
Last edited by LiquidMetal14; 03-22-2012 at 12:20 PM.
dark10x
60 fps 60 fps 60 fps 60 fps 30 fps 60 fps 60 fps
(03-22-2012, 12:14 PM)

dark10x's Avatar
#1536

Performance looks nice, but I'm kind of glad it isn't a massive leap. I purchased a GTX580 on the cheap from a GAF member earlier this year and was kind of hoping the 680 wouldn't completely obliterate it yet. :P OK, that's kind of silly, but hey.

I really need to upgrade my CPU, though, as it seems the good ol' i7 930 just can't keep up with the 580 in some cases. I'm finding some games are CPU limited with drops under 60 fps occurring regardless of graphical settings.
Geezer
Broken water pistol loaded with piss
(03-22-2012, 12:19 PM)
#1537

Originally Posted by artist: View Post
6 SMX
1152 SPs
96 TMUs
24 ROPs
6 Polymorph engines
192-bit 6Gbps GDDR5
May
$299
Out of interest,is this based on GK104 with parts disabled or another smaller die?
Semiaccurate said that there will be 7 and 8 part GK104s, which correspond to 1344SP (maybe a future GTX 670) and 1536SP (GTX 680) variants.
confused
Banned
(03-22-2012, 12:19 PM)

confused's Avatar
#1538

So, can this card finally run Crysis 1 maxed at 60+ fps @ 1080P or can we finally admit the game was just badly optimised/terribly supported ?
Fixed1979
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:21 PM)

Fixed1979's Avatar
#1539

Ordered...now I just have to wait for it to arrive.
artist
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:22 PM)

artist's Avatar
#1540

Originally Posted by Geezer: View Post
Out of interest,is this based on GK104 with parts disabled or another smaller die?
Semiaccurate said that there will be 7 and 8 part GK104s, which correspond to 1344SP (maybe a future GTX 670) and 1536SP (GTX 680) variants.
Yes. Unconfirmed so dont put any stock into it.
rabhw
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:23 PM)

rabhw's Avatar
#1541

So if GK104 = GTX680, GK110 = GTX690? Does that mean the 690 will be a dual-GPU part like the 590? Haven't been keeping up with this stuff.

I want to hop off the SLI / CrossfireX train, so I'll be selling my dual 6950's to buy one of these. Where do people reliably and un-sketchily sell video cards?
BrokenEchelon
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:24 PM)

BrokenEchelon's Avatar
#1542

Nvidia GPUs are better than AMD GPUs?

What a huge surprise.

I don't have a personal need for a 600 series yet, but I sure as hell am happy with progress.
georaldc
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:29 PM)
#1543

Those benchmarks make me happy and sad at the same time lol. Happy because of the good performance increases, and sad because I don't see my card in any of those benches lol.

I have a 6970 and a 1920x1080 monitor. You guys think its worth it to do the jump? The only really heavy games I have are Battlefield, Crysis and Witcher 2 (uber).
michaelius
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:33 PM)
#1544

Originally Posted by amstradcpc: View Post
Is a huge deal for the life of the GPU.
Surely my GTX 470 would be very very dead already if it mattered ;)

Are there any rumors about 670 release date ? I'd love to upgrade but i always prefer to get slightly cut down versions of top card as they have better value/performance ratio.
scogoth
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:40 PM)

scogoth's Avatar
#1545

Originally Posted by dark10x: View Post
Performance looks nice, but I'm kind of glad it isn't a massive leap. I purchased a GTX580 on the cheap from a GAF member earlier this year and was kind of hoping the 680 wouldn't completely obliterate it yet. :P OK, that's kind of silly, but hey.

I really need to upgrade my CPU, though, as it seems the good ol' i7 930 just can't keep up with the 580 in some cases. I'm finding some games are CPU limited with drops under 60 fps occurring regardless of graphical settings.
No game should you be CPU limited with a i7 930. Are you running stock clocks?
Refreshment.01
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:40 PM)

Refreshment.01's Avatar
#1546

Originally Posted by The Dutch Slayer: View Post
I have a AMD HD 5850.

I know 500 is a lot of money but man I think it would be a great upgrade.
But it depends on what you are actually playing. Given the prices and my gaming diet beginning to think i could easily hold my self for some months until new things or prices become more reasonable. Plus the 2GB is a turn off, a game like Skyrim gets close to 2GB at 1080p plus official texture pack and running with 4x AA.

Really impressive but who overclocks better at stock voltage? That could be a decisive factor.
Originally Posted by confused: View Post
So, can this card finally run Crysis 1 maxed at 60+ fps @ 1080P or can we finally admit the game was just badly optimised/terribly supported ?
Or you could get the other pair of glasses and view it this way, there were also a lot of games that didn't look close to Crysis yet ran worse.
Last edited by Refreshment.01; 03-22-2012 at 12:45 PM.
Felix Lighter
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:41 PM)

Felix Lighter's Avatar
#1547

Looks like an amazing card. I should have stuck with 5850 just a bit longer it seems.
The Dutch Slayer
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:43 PM)

The Dutch Slayer's Avatar
#1548

Originally Posted by Refreshment.01: View Post
But it depends on what you are actually playing. Given the prices and my gaming diet beginning to think i could easily hold my self for some months.

Really impressive but who overclocks better at stock voltage? That could be a decisive factor.
Building a new rig as soon as ivybrige is out so I can wait at least until that is out :)

I do do gaming at 1920x1080 on my tv with the 360 controller, most of the time.
And most of the time not full all high but mostly high settings.
scogoth
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:45 PM)

scogoth's Avatar
#1549

Originally Posted by The Dutch Slayer: View Post
Building a new rig as soon as ivybrige is out so I can wait at least until that is out :)

I do do gaming at 1920x1080 on my tv with the 360 controller, most of the time.
And most of the time not full all high but mostly high settings.
So why do you need $500gpu and new CPU to game at 60fps at 1080p with a controller with noticeable input lag?
Refreshment.01
Member
(03-22-2012, 12:50 PM)

Refreshment.01's Avatar
#1550

Originally Posted by scogoth: View Post
So why do you need $500gpu and new CPU to game at 60fps at 1080p with a controller with noticeable input lag?
Yes, and i'll add that depending from what CPU The Dutch Slayer is upgrading and what games he typically uses he could still get slight fps increases because of the better cpu architecture. Also Dutch try to get a GPU with 3GB, even if you game at 1080p i gave that Skyrim example were 2GB gets maximized depending on your settings.

Maybe some months from now there will be a 680 3GB edition at the same price.