|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:54 AM)
|
#3251
I read through the whole thing, people tested it with the .25 drivers, it doesnt help. Later on the OP posts his clocks while the benchmark is running, and it shows it somewhere around 1350mhz. Another guy with a 670 also comes in and posts another bench with similar results also at around 1350mhz. Most 680s can only get to 1200mhz, thus the 670 is basically equal to the 680.
|
|
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:59 AM)
|
#3254
Whatever it is I'm glad I havent bought anything yet. |
|
(05-07-2012, 06:28 AM)
|
#3256
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 07:05 AM)
|
#3257
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 07:20 AM)
|
#3258
Right now, according to him, 4-Way SLI is almost no difference than having 3 way, but you have to remember that drivers are very early right now and as drivers mature, SLI scaling will improve as time goes by. I know that was the case with the 480/580's as drivers improved so did SLI scaling. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 08:14 AM)
|
#3259
so far voltage control is disabled on both a software level and on a hardware level on the reference boards. The normal reference cards also have only 4 out of 5 phases on the PCB, the fifth spot is blank (cost savings due to GPU being more efficient than expected?) In order not to blow up these PCBs I guess they limited overvolting ability. EVGA has been putting out cards (like the hydrocopper) with the fifth phase enabled, but with the same voltage restrictions still in place they don't clock any better than the regular cards do (hydrocoppers clock worse than some stock air cooled cards, despite paying a hefty premium for those ....) So now the question is whether we finally get overvolting with the new batch of custom PCB cards that are coming up (Asus DC2, MSI Lightning, KFA HoF, etc) ... without a soldering iron ofcourse if the 670 really clocks better, I guess their smaller\partially disabled chips have some more space within the currently limited voltage. Or they generate so much less heat they stay better within the power/thermal limits introduced with this new boost clock thing.... Will also be interesting to see if there is a difference between the small PCB 670s and the larger PCB ones (as they use some surplus 680 PCBs) |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 08:38 AM)
|
#3262
A standard Gigabyte GTX 680... 3 weeks ago... and now from what i can tell the 670 is as powerful yet runs cooler and uses less power. And i have this OC complex about avoiding buyer's remorse at all costs. There had better be a light at the end of this tunnel or i will likely sell my 680 and get a 670
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 08:47 AM)
|
#3263
oh man he just posted overclocked SLI 670 (Gigabyte custom PCB) results
ever so slightly over 20k GPU score ... most watercooled (!) reference 680 SLI I found on hardwarebot only scored 5% better (21k and a bit) and that's with only 1 GPU over 1300 MHz as far as I can see, the other one is lagging behind a bit so yeah either those custom 680 PCBs have to be really really REALLY nice or I see a 670 SLI in my future |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 09:03 AM)
|
#3264
Yeah, but he games at 5760x1080 @120Hz and expects 120FPS across those three monitors. It's not unusual for hardcore flight or racing sim folk to do similar; it's not entirely about the e-peen here there are completely justfiable needs for such a setup :)
|
|
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
(05-07-2012, 10:06 AM)
|
#3265
A GTX670 sounds absolutely amazing....heck ill probably go SLI. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:16 AM)
|
#3271
Ordered a 690 on Saturday. I knew I was getting the shaft slightly but still signed up; now I know I they're not going to be using lube whilst they shaft me. Oh well - I still want a single card solution for reasons of heat and power, but I am damn sure paying a premium for it.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:17 AM)
|
#3272
You mean, thank god they were never in stock. Gonna check out what all the fuss is with the 670s now. Eventually, the 6xx line will see healthy stock, and I'd like to get the most bang for my buck. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 10:17 AM)
|
#3273
Except, I've waited through the 7970, the 680 2GB, the 690 and got the 4GB 680. Give it a month or two and the 660 probably comes along that is so rock solid it'll crack 680 speeds. Then in a few months we'll see a 695 or a 7xx series that blows the competition out of the water. If you had to wait, you could wait forever - It's all about guessing when to pounce.
However, the 680 should have been able to clock higher, which is why Nvidia screwed us over a bit. If all the chips were able to clock reasonably it wouldn't be a problem. Still hoping my Palit 4GBs have a decent chip on them, so I can give them a boot full of mhz. Pure price to performance ratio I don't give a toss about, I have money. However paying premium for exactly the same as someone paying less, that's a bit weak. HOPEFULLY, a lot of this is based on review information, they tend to get sent top-bin chips that'll clock higher. We'll see when it really launches and we have the same saturation as the 680.
Last edited by Sethos; 05-07-2012 at 10:27 AM.
|
|
relies on auto-aim
(05-07-2012, 10:17 AM)
|
#3274
At $399 USD I will buy BUCKETS and resale to GAF.
|
|
do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
(05-07-2012, 11:16 AM)
|
#3277
Probably, there were those 2.5GB GTX570 floating around, im sure 4GB GTX670 will pop up soonish
But no i seriously waited.....and now im glad i did if i can find someone to get my Golden Sample for ~250 ill be in heaven, the GS does clock to 950 easy....and 1000 with a little volt modding. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 11:21 AM)
|
#3278
|
|
Junior Member
(05-07-2012, 12:50 PM)
|
#3280
That is my sentiment almost exactly. After weeks of not being able to order a Nvidia 680, I laugh at the irony of it all. I would have gladly purchased one before I heard about the 670's performance, but now I am going to wait and make sure that the 670 lives up to its hype. Since I will be building a rig for a friend this summer, I want to get him the best value and experience for his first true gaming rig (I build, he pays for it).
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:48 PM)
|
#3281
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 02:58 PM)
|
#3283
Then the 4GB models were announced and I knew I needed those in my life - By that time I also knew the 690 was coming through mah' sources. So I waited ... Waited ... Waited, no news. 4GB finally came in stock and I pulled the trigger. So all the cards were an option but I just knew I'd regret it at some point. Don't really regret my purchase but those 670s are looking mighty fine, would also have to sit around waiting for higher Vram models so it's not too bad. Point being, normally they pace each GPU to fit into a certain market slot. The 670 just seems to run right alongside the 680 at a lower cost, you do feel a bit screwed over by Nvidia. This isn't even about waiting, a lower card shouldn't do that. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:05 PM)
|
#3284
Quote:
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 03:06 PM)
|
#3285
But they can still be OC'd and have 4GB of Ram, I'm obviously happy with my purchase albeit a tad expensive. Just the nature of the situation. However as I said, still want to see the blue collar man get a hold of a 670, could still be top-bin chips that tend to reach reviewers and first adopters. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 04:41 PM)
|
#3289
The 670 board size is crazy. Can't wait for them to be released and reviewed.
Also, slim chance, but does any maker of nVidia cards ever release cards with a red PCB or cooler? Trying to go with a certain color theme with my new build and a red GPU would be perfect. If not I guess I'll just go with black and call it a day. |
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:08 PM)
|
#3290
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:09 PM)
|
#3291
|
|
I'm mad as hell but this sandwich is delicious
(05-07-2012, 05:12 PM)
|
#3292
So it's all about the 670? Cool.
Last edited by Dreams-Visions; 05-07-2012 at 05:33 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:44 PM)
|
#3296
www.scan.co.uk (if you're in the UK) had stock coming in on the 11th. Gainward, Gigabyte, MSI, Asus and EVGA all listed as being available from the 11th.
|
|
Member
(05-07-2012, 05:48 PM)
|
#3297
|