|
Banned
(04-24-2012, 07:56 PM)
|
|
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(04-24-2012, 09:10 PM)
|
Not really politics but . . . .
The John Edwards case is a bit a farce. Yeah, the guy is a scumbag and a liar. But this whole campaign contribution thing is a bit of a stretch. It would be illegal for him to spend campaign contributions on supporting a mistress. So how can you prosecute people giving money to support the mistress as being undeclared illegal campaign contributions? If they declared the money as contributions, it still would have been illegal. No matter how they spend money on her, it would be illegal . . . that doesn't seem to make sense. |
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(04-24-2012, 10:11 PM)
|
Maybe not. It will be interesting to see if there continues to be an anti-Romney vote. Maybe Newt will get a resurgence? maybe Ron Paul will bring in more than 10%. Maybe people will continue to vote for Santorum.
It will be very interesting to see the turn-out and what the total of Romney votes versus not-Romney votes is. I have no idea what will happen. |
|
Banned
(04-24-2012, 11:03 PM)
|
Looks like Romney is planning quite a barn burner speech tonight to set off the general election
Quote:
Great line! He also plans on addressing fairness (in one of the weaker parts of the speech imo): http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.co...a-in-primetime |
|
Junior Member
(04-24-2012, 11:15 PM)
|
Quote:
And you would have to be stupid to buy any of that bullshit. |
|
Member
(04-24-2012, 11:42 PM)
|
Originally Posted by Mitt Romney's Shit Speech:
Also, the middle class isn't growing, Mitt. |
|
Member
(04-24-2012, 11:46 PM)
|
That line is good cable news fodder. It all depends on which way the economy is moving in the next 6 months.
I mean, that's the main thing that will determine the election outcome. But, Romney talking about fairness does no good to him. If economy is improving and Romney brings fairness into the debate, he is toast. Romney is officially starting his GE campaign today. Obama needs to kick it into gear too. |
|
sober, clothed, willing
(04-25-2012, 12:04 AM)
|
It is always curious to see Hilary folks warp their original standards and philosophy to attack Obama. It made the Tea Party look like a High School Logic club. You basically couldn't slide a credit card between Hilary and Obama on policy and style, but when Obama got the nod the Hilary hystericals acted like it was Hitler Versus Santa. I remember that old Jewish lady (host) on Air America went fucking MENTAL and turned into a racist overnight after Obama won the primary. It was absolutely shocking and bizarre.
|
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 12:10 AM)
|
This should be interesting
#12329
http://nationaljournal.com/congress/...rates-20120424
Senate and WH agree to close S-Corporation loophole to pay for the Student Loan Interest Rate Extension. Republicans will oppose it (tax hike), I wonder what stance Romney will take. |
|
water to wine
the drink exchanger (04-25-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
|
|
sober, clothed, willing
(04-25-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
|
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 12:16 AM)
|
I'm also confused by Phoenix Dark.
Is he trolling? Cause he doesn't simply try to tell gaffers to "stay cautious" about an Obama victory. He is full-on playing devil's advocate, even sounding like a GOP pundit half the time. If it's not trolling and actually his opinions he is posting, it's quite sad to see how a person's political views and rationale can be so fickle that you can fall from one extreme end of the political spectrum into an another. "I'm disillusioned by Obama, therefore the other guy is good!" This is the only thing I'll say about PD, because it's annoying how he manages to make himself the biggest subject of this thread... |
|
sober, clothed, willing
(04-25-2012, 12:18 AM)
|
|
|
clairvoyancy is no excuse for trollin'
(04-25-2012, 12:27 AM)
|
I want the guy paying 13.9% tax on $20 MILLION (and who wants to cut that by another 20%) to talk about 'fairness'. Please . . . bring it up. |
|
Honk if you love cookies.
(04-25-2012, 12:46 AM)
|
Polls, polls everywhere!
http://www.nationaljournal.com/topli..._XgVes.twitter Obama beats Romney 47-39 Democrats win generic House ballot 46-43. 3 point margin is on the cusp of winning it back. They also polled generic Senate ballot, which is weird considering there's not a senator up in every state, but Democrats lead 50-39 on that. Troubling is that a plurality answered that government could get more done if Congress/White House control was split between the parties. What planet are these people living on |
|
dreams superior dreams
(04-25-2012, 12:54 AM)
|
|
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 01:03 AM)
|
a.) don't pay attention and b.) believe the logical fallacy that a compromise/middle ground is always the best route. |
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 01:19 AM)
|
|
|
sober, clothed, willing
(04-25-2012, 01:31 AM)
|
But the Hilaryis44 people went fucking nuts. I saw hysteria, racism, just sheer insanity. Was a real eye opener. |
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 01:33 AM)
|
|
|
Prefers her Trek sans Abrams
(04-25-2012, 01:34 AM)
|
|
|
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(04-25-2012, 01:44 AM)
|
The WSJ had their token non-ultra right wing view point article today (thus meeting their quota for the rest of the year) about higher taxes on the rich not likely destroying the world economy:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...997820160.html As usual, the comments section is very revealing. 90% of the people disagreeing with the article's premise are dismissing it simply based on the fact that the columnists are egghead, latte-sipping, Academia dwelling perfessors who never worked in the "private sector" a day in their lives. A few people try to go into detail as to WHY they think the article's incorrect, but don't really providing much compelling arguments. |
|
Member
(04-25-2012, 01:47 AM)
|
|
|
Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
(04-25-2012, 01:51 AM)
|
|
|
Banned
(04-25-2012, 02:01 AM)
|
|