|
Junior Member
(02-26-2012, 03:45 AM)
|
#2001
|
|
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:45 AM)
|
#2002
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:47 AM)
|
#2003
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:47 AM)
|
#2004
|
|
Junior Member
(02-26-2012, 03:47 AM)
|
#2005
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:48 AM)
|
#2006
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:50 AM)
|
#2007
I hope we get more varied dance moves this time around. And more air instruments.
|
|
The Tree of Liberty
(02-26-2012, 03:51 AM)
|
#2008
The people I would be bringing in are immediate family: my brothers and my wife. I have a few former guildmates from WoW but I have not mentioned anything to them yet. They are a family as well, though.
I am not crazy about putting restrictions on non-gaffers. Again, it's not fair to treat then like second class members when they have been vouched for. |
|
Junior Member
(02-26-2012, 03:51 AM)
|
#2009
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:52 AM)
|
#2010
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:53 AM)
|
#2011
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:54 AM)
|
#2012
|
|
Junior Member
(02-26-2012, 03:57 AM)
|
#2013
i know it sounds like its wrong, but whats to stop them from them emptying out our guild bank and putting it into their other guild bank assuming they are part of another guild. or just keeping the stuff for themselves or selling it. i mean, i know anyone of us could probably do the same thing but i doubt we would try and screw over our own community. theres a bigger chance of that happening with an outsider with full access to our guild bank.
Last edited by KaoticBlaze; 02-26-2012 at 03:59 AM.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 03:59 AM)
|
#2014
Yogscast in charge of learning how to dodge more?
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:00 AM)
|
#2015
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:02 AM)
|
#2016
I'm all for having outside members join. More members means more opportunities to get things done. As long as a GAF member vouches for them there shouldn't really be a discussion about it imo.
Last edited by SDBurton; 02-26-2012 at 04:07 AM.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:02 AM)
|
#2017
|
|
Junior Member
(02-26-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#2018
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:03 AM)
|
#2019
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:06 AM)
|
#2020
|
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 04:07 AM)
|
#2021
|
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 04:13 AM)
|
#2022
If there are restrictions placed on guild members, it should have less to do with those members' origins and more to do with overseeing the general well-being of the guild. |
|
The Tree of Liberty
(02-26-2012, 04:16 AM)
|
#2023
I don't think ANYONE, even officers, should have full access to the guild bank. No one should be able to clean it out except the GM. Members should be something like 5-10 items daily. Officers maybe triple that.
Additionally, anyone with more access than usual should be required to have additional account security, authenticators and whatnot. |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:18 AM)
|
#2024
So Retro do you know for sure what you and your wife is going? I want to have my girlfriend and I take opposite classes so we can all see how they work together.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:18 AM)
|
#2025
|
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 04:23 AM)
|
#2026
I agree with this set-up. I would also suggest that the number of guild officers be kept at a bare minimum at release and grown based on activity and helpfulness thereafter. In essence, I'm suggesting that we don't begin the game with a ton of gaffers as officers, as it would invariably suggest some form of punishment or mitigation towards players from outside of GAF.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:26 AM)
|
#2027
The one i'm in has a democracy set up within the high ranks, sort of like a round table if you will. No one person will have full power.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:32 AM)
|
#2028
The way it's setup now is sort of the way you described Vinci.
I'll be leading with Jira as co-leader now with Retro and Max as two officers as of this point. I do want to add a couple more people as officers because im expecting a lot of people interested and want enough officers on and available to help if needed. I also don't want an excessive amount of officers either but like you said, we can add more depending on how active they become and how well they help out other members. |
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 04:35 AM)
|
#2029
i think wer starting to get power crazy, even though no one has power. i think we all need to take a step back and think of a name first.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:35 AM)
|
#2030
The name's already been decided...
|
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 04:36 AM)
|
#2031
|
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 04:36 AM)
|
#2032
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:40 AM)
|
#2033
NeoGAF [GAF]
Sounds perfect to me |
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 04:42 AM)
|
#2034
I'll add some options, one way or another:
Ghetto Action Force Gaming's Annoying Friends Good and Fucked Gathering All Females Grin and Frolic |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:42 AM)
|
#2035
Why does the name have to mean something or be something funny and witty? It's a GAF guild. We want to represent the site in game and its simple, to the point, and most people agreed it was the best option anyway.
Best one of the five.
Last edited by Ferny; 02-26-2012 at 04:45 AM.
|
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 04:44 AM)
|
#2036
its fun. we know its gonna be GAF, its just so delightful ^.^
Last edited by Complex Shadow; 02-26-2012 at 04:47 AM.
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:46 AM)
|
#2037
I like Ghetto Action Force
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 04:46 AM)
|
#2038
I concede that if there are more members than there is space in the maximum guild limit, then yes GAFers should get priority, but if there's space, why not let them in? |
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 05:07 AM)
|
#2039
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:11 AM)
|
#2040
|
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 05:17 AM)
|
#2041
|
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:18 AM)
|
#2042
I'm all for allowing non-gaffers in the guild, more people = more fun and opportunities. Only requirement IMO its they follow the rules and behave well like every member of the guild.
About the name we can make a vote using a survey or something like that, i like the simpleness of NeoGAF(GAF) tho. And the press beta videos should be used to teach people what not to do :D |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:19 AM)
|
#2043
yay! talking about guilds is getting me excited
|
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 05:21 AM)
|
#2044
Gentlemen and Fiends
Generals of Awkward Fun Generic Angry Face Generally Against Furries Gone and Forgotten Griefers Against Friendship Gods of All Fiction |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:26 AM)
|
#2045
I like the idea of a GAF acronym, personally. I understand people wanting the guild to represent GAF, considering the vast majority of people will be from here. Even if we do end up going with neoGAF with the GAF tag I'm ok with it. I just think using an acronym adds a bit more personality to the guild name.
I'm not sure what the minimum number of characters are needed for guilds in the game, but I was also thinking of going something like guild name: neo tag: GAF. I think acronyms based on neo with the tag GAF would be kind of neat, too, and still fit the whole neoGAF name. Not Exactly Ordinary New Elite Order Not Even Organized I don't think it's really necessary to decide on a name just yet. We still have quite a ways to go before release. Just my thoughts on it. |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:30 AM)
|
#2046
We're supposed to represent NeoGAF, why is NeoGAF not a good enough name? |
|
Member
(02-26-2012, 05:30 AM)
|
#2047
I like where this topic has went. One of the most important "little things" to me, dances. Maybe Anet can do a "Dance Studio" where you can either create, or just even "buy" new dances for your toon. Some other developer was going to do a dance studio before, but they failed as usual to deliver.
Yes though, I'd be fine buying more dances at a cash shop. Sad to say. |
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 05:31 AM)
|
#2048
|
|
Danish
(02-26-2012, 05:31 AM)
|
#2049
Nataku has a point:
Never Ending Orgies Nubile and Exotic Officers Neutered Eunuchs Organization Newly Elected Organ-donors
Last edited by Vinci; 02-26-2012 at 05:36 AM.
Reason: Boredom mostly...
|
|
Cudi Lame™
(02-26-2012, 05:33 AM)
|
#2050
:lol. Now we need some thing for GAF.
Edit: also, people who arn't gaffers can't see the comunity threads. Right?
Last edited by Complex Shadow; 02-26-2012 at 05:36 AM.
|