Fallout-NL
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:05 PM)

Fallout-NL's Avatar
#51

Originally Posted by jorma: View Post
this is demonstrably false; copyright infringers spend more money on copyrighted works than non-infringers.
Bingo.
ssolitare
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:07 PM)
#52

So if you are a streamer you are still screwed?
Cmagus
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:07 PM)

Cmagus's Avatar
#53

Well Canada is somewhat trying to do the same thing with Bill-C11. This bill is all over the place right now hopefully they don't get the right to stop peoples internet.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/03...n_1346132.html

"Steve Anderson, national co-ordinator of Openmedia.ca, a national campaign for open and low-cost internet, says the bill is a win for consumers over all, but the group is still concerned about how the legislation handles so-called digital locks on copyrighted content. C-11 makes no provisions to allow consumers to break digital locks on material they've bought.

Opposition MPs tried to exempt users who break locks for lawful reasons, to make a backup copy for example, but Conservative MPs wouldn't budge.

Anderson says there were groups lobbying for stricter provisions, like access to subscriber data from internet service providers or the ability to terminate internet service for first-time offenders who are convicted of violating the copyright law, and he's pleased those changes didn't make it into the bill."
Last edited by Cmagus; 03-22-2012 at 03:10 PM.
immy
Banned
(03-22-2012, 03:09 PM)

immy's Avatar
#54

Hmm what do people use these days now that rapidshare sucks?
onemic
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:09 PM)

onemic's Avatar
#55

Originally Posted by darkwing: View Post
this might be the end of public torrents?
and the flourishing of private torrents
Hari Seldon
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:10 PM)

Hari Seldon's Avatar
#56

Our corporate overlords will not stop until the entire internet is mandated that you watch 3 minutes of commercials out of every 10 minutes of internet time.
Lonestar
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:13 PM)

Lonestar's Avatar
#57

Originally Posted by Night_Trekker: View Post
Yep. Do your piracy on those and let them take the fall. Watch it happen.



No, it's because the MPAA and the RIAA never have enough money.
HA HA It already does happen.
PSGames
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 03:13 PM)

PSGames's Avatar
#58

Originally Posted by jorma: View Post
this is demonstrably false; copyright infringers spend more money on copyrighted works than non-infringers.
Interesting. Do you have any links for this?
params7
Banned
(03-22-2012, 03:15 PM)

params7's Avatar
#59

Ok. I need a list of participating and non-participating ISP's. PRONTO
Rebel Leader
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:24 PM)

Rebel Leader's Avatar
#60

Originally Posted by ssolitare: View Post
So if you are a streamer you are still screwed?
I think I'll be fine since all of the stuff I steam is foreign.
Keru_Shiri
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:26 PM)

Keru_Shiri's Avatar
#61

Originally Posted by jorma: View Post
this is demonstrably false; copyright infringers spend more money on copyrighted works than non-infringers.
Is there a source? Not trying to gainsay your statement, but I legitimately want to know where I can find that data.
Sweeper17
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 03:27 PM)
#62

I think there will be a opening for going back to 56K to download small files and these could starting opening other private networks.
Seraphinianus
Banned
(03-22-2012, 03:30 PM)
#63

Originally Posted by onemic: View Post
and the flourishing of private torrents

torrents from private sites aren't any less traceable. It's just the site itself that's password protected from the public.
Reseil
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:35 PM)

Reseil's Avatar
#64

Originally Posted by onemic: View Post
and the flourishing of private torrents
Newsgroups
Hari Seldon
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:36 PM)

Hari Seldon's Avatar
#65

Originally Posted by Seraphinianus: View Post
torrents from private sites aren't any less traceable. It's just the site itself that's password protected from the public.
If the torrent transfer forces encrypted transfer then the ISP will have no clue wtf you are doing.
pyros
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:38 PM)

pyros's Avatar
#66

I wish consumers worldwide could join together to boycott mainstream media for just one week, that would scare the hell out of most corporations.


just a dream
zoukka
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:39 PM)

zoukka's Avatar
#67

Quote:
With SOPA and PIPA out of the way for now, American users of the Web must look ahead before declaring victory in a war against online censorship. Recently the US fought and won for the extradition of a 23-year-old UK man who operated a website that American authorities decided was in violation of US law. If they are willing to ship a college student abroad to bring him to trial for posting a few links, will they think twice before turning off your Internet for sharing your own copies of South Park? That’s an episode you’ll have to stay tuned for to find out.
lol what, just remove US internets from the rest of the world and be done with it.

Will miss GAF.
Seanspeed
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:40 PM)

Seanspeed's Avatar
#68

Cox Cable has been doing this for a while already.

And I see nothing wrong with it.
jorma
is now taking requests
(03-22-2012, 03:44 PM)
#69

Originally Posted by PSGames: View Post
Interesting. Do you have any links for this?
There is plenty of research and as far as i know all the independant research done came to the same conclusion. I know that both norwegian and swedish universities has done the research. Most of the stuff i've read on it is in Swedish though.

fake edit:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009...buy-more-music

I'll try to find better examples later but my ride home from work is waiting patiently for me to finish up here :P
BruiserBear
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:45 PM)

BruiserBear's Avatar
#70

Originally Posted by Sentry: View Post
Scary shit.
It's not scary if you don't pirate.
ClovingWestbrook
If you see me on Gaming Side being a jackass, contact Blackace and Bish immediately
(03-22-2012, 03:48 PM)

ClovingWestbrook's Avatar
#71

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
It's not scary if you don't pirate.
Really? Come on man.
zoukka
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:50 PM)

zoukka's Avatar
#72

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
It's not scary if you don't pirate.
You might want cameras in your bathroom because you don't masturbate and metal detectors in your doorsteps in case your neighbour comes in with a machete, but I don't.
Talamius
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:50 PM)
#73

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
It's not scary if you don't pirate.
How secure is your wireless?
Eschaton
Once got into a vicious fistfight with a coat hanger
(03-22-2012, 03:51 PM)

Eschaton's Avatar
#74

A milestone in the eventual internet history classes.

Still isnt stopping piracy though.
BruiserBear
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:52 PM)

BruiserBear's Avatar
#75

Originally Posted by zoukka: View Post
You might want cameras in your bathroom because you don't masturbate and metal detectors in your doorsteps in case your neighbour comes in with a machete, but I don't.
Really? It's the same thing?


Originally Posted by Talamius: View Post
How secure is your wireless?
Secure enough. I also don't walk around scared every day that I could get arrested because someone who looks like me might commit a crime.
abusori
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:53 PM)

abusori's Avatar
#76

Originally Posted by params7: View Post
Ok. I need a list of participating and non-participating ISP's. PRONTO
Yeah, this would be helpful.
darkwing
Member
(03-22-2012, 03:57 PM)

darkwing's Avatar
#77

Originally Posted by jorma: View Post
this is demonstrably false; copyright infringers spend more money on copyrighted works than non-infringers.
probably not true in Asia, heck in our country, in every corner there are stalls selling pirated stuff, 'movies' cost like $2, so why would they buy original stuff lol
SoulPlaya
more money than God
(03-22-2012, 04:04 PM)

SoulPlaya's Avatar
#78

Does this apply to video game piracy? Shouldn't game companies be trying to get in on this?
SpacLock
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:05 PM)

SpacLock's Avatar
#79

I don't see Charter Communications mentioned anywhere in that article, so whatever. Charter skipped that whole bandwidth cap debacle, too.
Tantalus
Junior Member
(03-22-2012, 04:19 PM)

Tantalus's Avatar
#80

This might cause trouble for some people who torrent large amounts, but for the "smart pirate" it probably isn't going to be an issue. With so many methods of encryption and ways to obscure network traffic, there is always going to be a way around these kind of things. The only difference is that now more and more people will start looking into ways to hide what they are doing, and then we're back to square one again.
Eschaton
Once got into a vicious fistfight with a coat hanger
(03-22-2012, 04:25 PM)

Eschaton's Avatar
#81

Originally Posted by SoulPlaya: View Post
Does this apply to video game piracy? Shouldn't game companies be trying to get in on this?
Maybe, but game publishers and developers dont present a united front on the issue is my guess. That's reflected in how PC games(probably the most pirated format of games) are handled by different companies. The video games industry is pretty good about trying to adapt their model to changing times to make money. At least in comparison to the oldies in the music and film industry that can't deal with the fact that they aren't making Michael Jackson money anymore.
LordCanti
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:31 PM)

LordCanti's Avatar
#82

Originally Posted by Hari Seldon: View Post
If the torrent transfer forces encrypted transfer then the ISP will have no clue wtf you are doing.
That's not how this works though. The license holder jumps on a torrent (they know what it is) and finds your IP. They then send your ISP a notice, and the ISP sends it along to you (and then takes action if necessary).

It makes no difference if the torrent is forcing encryption or not. No one is accountable for actually proving that you've downloaded what the license holder says you have (which is the major problem I see with this).
CornBurrito
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:37 PM)

CornBurrito's Avatar
#83

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
It's not scary if you don't pirate.
Question: Would watching a clip of an episode on youtube get me in trouble for piracy?
jorma
is now taking requests
(03-22-2012, 04:40 PM)
#84

Originally Posted by jorma: View Post
There is plenty of research and as far as i know all the independant research done came to the same conclusion. I know that both norwegian and swedish universities has done the research. Most of the stuff i've read on it is in Swedish though.

fake edit:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009...buy-more-music

I'll try to find better examples later but my ride home from work is waiting patiently for me to finish up here :P
Adding a few interesting links on the matter:

http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Stu...n_file_sharing

http://torrentfreak.com/suppressed-r...sumers-110719/
BruiserBear
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:43 PM)

BruiserBear's Avatar
#85

Originally Posted by Obsessed: View Post
Question: Would watching a clip of an episode on youtube get me in trouble for piracy?
No, and I don't think there is even a tiny chance ISPs would suggest so. We all know who they're after here, and it's not YouTube users.
DonasaurusRex
Online Ho Champ
(03-22-2012, 04:44 PM)

DonasaurusRex's Avatar
#86

well back when i was in HS my teacher predicted this....said over time governments and companies will get a stranglehold on the net...even though no one should be in charge of it.


next(now) will be metered internet so that logging onto a fucking gateway and using internet backbones that taxpayers paid for decades ago. We still dont have our fiber optic network that fully replaced copper ...wtf happened to that money.
MMaRsu
I need some paprika
Official moneylender of the Coalition of Muslim Drug Dealers
(03-22-2012, 04:51 PM)

MMaRsu's Avatar
#87

Fuck thank god I dont live in the US what the fuck

I thought USA stood for fucking freedom and shit
Rebel Leader
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:54 PM)

Rebel Leader's Avatar
#88

Originally Posted by MMaRsu: View Post
Fuck thank god I dont live in the US what the fuck

I thought USA stood for fucking freedom and shit
It's freedom with restrictions.
bangai-o
Member
(03-22-2012, 04:57 PM)

bangai-o's Avatar
#89

do they see you everytime you login to your bank account?
BruiserBear
Member
(03-22-2012, 05:04 PM)

BruiserBear's Avatar
#90

Originally Posted by MMaRsu: View Post
Fuck thank god I dont live in the US what the fuck

I thought USA stood for fucking freedom and shit
Well, if it's true freedom we're after we should just have anarchy, right?
Angry Fork
Spelling is Hard
(03-22-2012, 05:10 PM)

Angry Fork's Avatar
#91

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
Well, if it's true freedom we're after we should just have anarchy, right?
We should. Anarchy mixed with socialism. That's basically where things should go imo and what's best for humanity in terms of democracy, freedom etc.

But you're thinking of the chaos/dog gone wild/explosion kind of anarchy which is bullshit.
pelicansurf
Needs a Holiday on Gallifrey
(03-22-2012, 05:12 PM)

pelicansurf's Avatar
#92

Originally Posted by BruiserBear: View Post
Well, if it's true freedom we're after we should just have anarchy, right?
You need to stop, bro.

This is so silly, it's the best they can do after those bills crashed and burned.
bengraven
will fuck homely black hookers in the name of progress and tolerance
(03-22-2012, 05:16 PM)

bengraven's Avatar
#93

DOWNLOAD EVERYTHING YOU CAN QUICKLY.


Originally Posted by pelicansurf: View Post
You need to stop, bro.

This is so silly, it's the best they can do after those bills crashed and burned.
There was no way they were going to simply stop SOPA. They are going to keep reforming it over and over again until it's a law. They will never give up on it. The bottom line is the "wild west" of the internet is going to be chained up and under control within 5 years. Maybe less.
SoulPlaya
more money than God
(03-22-2012, 05:17 PM)

SoulPlaya's Avatar
#94

Originally Posted by MMaRsu: View Post
Fuck thank god I dont live in the US what the fuck

I thought USA stood for fucking freedom and shit
Here, "freedom" means Capitalism.
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
(03-22-2012, 05:17 PM)
#95

OMG.. I might not be able to blatantly break the law!

INTERNET DESTROYED!!

LULZ

Honestly people talking about freedom? GTFO of here with that crap.. seriously..gonna have to ignore all threads on this because it's going to be painful. You are not "free" to break well defined and purposeful laws.. this is the ALTERNATIVE to getting personally sued, which the RIAA backed off on.

Much better solution. Can we get back to normalcy some day? A planet where people don't think piracy is some "right"?
bengraven
will fuck homely black hookers in the name of progress and tolerance
(03-22-2012, 05:18 PM)

bengraven's Avatar
#96

Originally Posted by SoulPlaya: View Post
Here, "freedom" means Capitalism.
Yes. They're the ones with the freedom.
ReturnOfTheRAT
Member
(03-22-2012, 05:21 PM)

ReturnOfTheRAT's Avatar
#97

Originally Posted by MMaRsu: View Post
Fuck thank god I dont live in the US what the fuck

I thought USA stood for fucking freedom and shit
Freedom to steal?
nVidiot_Whore
Banned
(03-22-2012, 05:24 PM)
#98

Average modern human: I DEMAND all companies make their products available to me digitally. If they don't, I'll find an alternative source for them.

*entire industry switches over to digital distribution*

Alright.. what I MEANT WAS... I demand to be allowed to download this digital content illegally for free, and any attempt to stop me I'll scream about "freedom" and "corporations" and "the government."

The new reality we live in. Honestly people, grow the fuck up.
SoulPlaya
more money than God
(03-22-2012, 05:25 PM)

SoulPlaya's Avatar
#99

Wait, hasn't Comcast already been doing this for a while with the RIAA and MPAA?
ghostmind
Slightly Aroused
(03-22-2012, 05:27 PM)

ghostmind's Avatar
#100

Originally Posted by Rebel Leader: View Post
It's freedom with increasing restrictions.

More accurate, perhaps?