|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#501
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#502
In its current form its a very broad, very open to interpretation type of law. I believe it was intended for situations where someone is met with force or threat of force through no fault of their own that they wouldn't be under any obligation to retreat. Such as a car jacking or mugging. It wasn't intended for wanna-be-cops to be vigilantes then use it as their defense when they kill a kid carrying skittles and tea |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#503
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#504
Are you talking about in Florida specifically? I ask because you say it makes no sense, and if you read the law it makes quite a bit of sense.
Now, while Devo does make a good point in that it often protects people that it "shouldn't", the same could be said about many other laws. All created with good intent, but are being used/applied possibly too often and not to their original creators' intent. edit: Or maybe you mean it doesn't make any sense to you. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#505
Well, two audio experts said it wasn't Zimmerman. Trayvons's mom and cousin said it was Trayvon's voice. Every witness that night said it sounded like a child's or young man's voice. What conclusion would you draw?
|
|
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#506
Her point about a fair and impartial jury is a good one...gonna be tough now
|
|
King of Twin-Tails
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#507
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:23 PM)
|
#508
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:24 PM)
|
#509
Atheist gaf attack quick - the public official started her meetings with a prayer!!!1
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:24 PM)
|
#510
Police are getting glowing reviews. They can rest easy.
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:24 PM)
|
#511
No. SYG has nothing to do with this. If Mr. Zimmerman followed the instructions of the officer on the phone and stayed put, he would not have been arrested and a boy would still be alive.
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:24 PM)
|
#512
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:24 PM)
|
#513
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:25 PM)
|
#514
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:25 PM)
|
#515
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:25 PM)
|
#516
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:26 PM)
|
#517
|
|
(04-11-2012, 11:26 PM)
|
#518
GREAT press conference. Very informative and easy to understand. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:26 PM)
|
#519
;) |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:26 PM)
|
#520
Prosecutor did well there.
Definitely seems more interested in the facts than giving the media what they want. |
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:26 PM)
|
#521
|
|
WW2 was not a racial conflict -- GOTCHA!
(04-11-2012, 11:27 PM)
|
#522
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:27 PM)
|
#523
As for the proof, we don't know yet. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:28 PM)
|
#525
|
|
good credit (by proxy)
(04-11-2012, 11:28 PM)
|
#526
yooooo unghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:28 PM)
|
#527
I don't see a problem with the intent of the law but rather that it's going to be used and abused. People should have a right to defend themselves at whatever cost WHEN their life or the lives of their loved ones are in jeopardy. Of course, as seen in this case, it's quite easy to claim your life was in jeopardy when the only witness to what happened is dead.
|
|
Tough_Smooth
(04-11-2012, 11:28 PM)
|
#528
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:29 PM)
|
#529
bloodlust is the enemy of justice, not an enabler of it. If he is guilty that's what the trial is for, we don't need people building up an illusion that justice for Trayvon is synonymous with zimmermans punishment. It might be, but its not on us to decide that. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:30 PM)
|
#530
With that said, regardless of anything else, Zimmerman's following of Trayvon (enough so to actually alarm Trayvon to the point of addressing it with someone he was talking on the phone with) is enough to tell me that Zimmerman has culpability in the outcomes of the evening... Even if Trayvon swung first. I just don't know to what degree that legal culpability really is under Florida laws. But we'll find out soon enough. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:30 PM)
|
#531
I am glad this is going to trial.
Lets see whats going on with the facts. |
|
underwear police
(04-11-2012, 11:31 PM)
|
#532
Al Sharpton on the podium.
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:31 PM)
|
#533
|
|
good credit (by proxy)
(04-11-2012, 11:31 PM)
|
#534
That's because you have zero understanding of how the technology works or how the human body makes vocal sound. Now if you say you wouldn't trust it given the low quality of the 911 tape, that's a different argument.
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:31 PM)
|
#535
2nd Degree Murder seems like the appropriate charge. We shall see if the prosecution has enough to convict. Should be an interesting trial.
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:32 PM)
|
#536
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:33 PM)
|
#537
Do most of you really think Zimmerman is a monster and a murderer? Do you think he planned to kill Trayvon that day when he decided to follow him?
Some of you guys act like this is a case of premeditated murder against an unarmed child for no reason. It is not even close. There is a huge difference! Whether his life was ever in danger is certainly debatable (hence the charge). I can't believe that any of you actually believe he ''had it out'' for Trayvon and did this for any other reason than what he felt like was self defense. I don't know if the law will agree that it was self defense, but in my opinion, Zimmerman certainly felt that way at the time and didn't have the luxury of analyzing every thing to the millionth degree like all of you do. I am not trying to defend Zimmerman's actions, but I am trying to put myself in his shoes at this point, and I truly feel bad for him. In my opinion, he is clearly not a racist or a murderer, but simply someone who may or may not have made some bad decisions and judgment calls that led to the unforunate death of a 17 year old ''child''. None of us know exactly what happened in the minutes that led up to Trayvon's death, but most of you seem pretty sure of yourselves about what happened and why it happened and you seem hell-bent on prosecuting Zimmerman long before all the facts are known and the court of law has rendered a verdict.
Last edited by whatbrown; 04-11-2012 at 11:35 PM.
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:33 PM)
|
#538
Imagine one of the first motions by the defense will be to change location of trial. Then it will go on for months and months of jury selection because the jury pool is beyond contaminated
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:34 PM)
|
#539
|
|
Tough_Smooth
(04-11-2012, 11:34 PM)
|
#540
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:35 PM)
|
#541
That removes the possibility of an accident. Either Trayvon was at fault or Zimmerman given those options. |
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:35 PM)
|
#542
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:35 PM)
|
#543
|
|
(04-11-2012, 11:35 PM)
|
#544
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:36 PM)
|
#545
Only reason he hasn't already been sent up the creek already is because he killed a black kid. If he had killed a white kid, it would be first degree murder. |
|
Still Alive
(04-11-2012, 11:36 PM)
|
#546
Live feed anywhere?
|
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:36 PM)
|
#547
|
|
Banned
(04-11-2012, 11:36 PM)
|
#548
We know that Zimmerman was told to sit in the car and not chase after him. He didn't follow the professional police officers orders and we now have a dead boy. He's completely to blame for the death. If he did was he was told he wouldn't be on trial and Martin would still be alive. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:37 PM)
|
#549
Florida's Stand Your Ground law directly obstructed police from arresting Zimmerman. The police chef even stated it.
There was already a legal protection for self-defense written into law, SYG eradicated exceptions and put a broad protection layer for disproportionate response based a person's own judgement in a tense situation. By law, it cedes judgement to the mental state of a distressed individual. |
|
Member
(04-11-2012, 11:37 PM)
|
#550
So at the very least he started following him and was planning on use his gun. On other issues, the real problem with SYG is that it stopped the cops from arresting Zimmerman at first. Not that just being able to kill someone because you have "reasonable belief of bodily damage" is not super crazy. |