|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:30 PM)
|
#102
ESPN and Netflix are the big ones (there's no way you get HBO for so little). They'd have to get at least one to justify the $10 increase over the base price of monthly LIVE.
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:30 PM)
|
#105
It's a very smart business move. Personally I think it's awful for the person paying it, though. I hope that in next-gen this is only one way of paying for the system, and that you can still buy it outright for a reasonable price.
Last edited by Omikaru; 05-02-2012 at 03:38 PM.
|
|
The Amiga Brotherhood
(05-02-2012, 03:31 PM)
|
#107
The sounds like testing the waters for what comes later. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:32 PM)
|
#109
Wow. Groundbreaking. Get ready for next gen heartache kids. This is surely a test run for their next gen console. Its probably too expensive for them to sell the normal way. Here's the rundown:
Xbox 720 outright w/ no contract: $800 Xbox 720 w/ a four year contract: $200 Xbox 720 w/ a three year contract: $300 Xbox 720 w/ a two year contract: $400 lol...this is not going to be fun times. |
|
Worships the porcelain goddess
(05-02-2012, 03:33 PM)
|
#111
|
|
AKA MS-Evangelist
(05-02-2012, 03:34 PM)
|
#112
What if...
Beefed up Durango, would retail for 599 without a loss BUT.. Can be sold for 199 if buyer agrees on a 2-3 year deal with 59 dollar per month? (or something similar like mobile phone) of course there will be a chance to pay the full amount also.. It feels that there is room for this kind of selling an expensive HW... Could work.. |
|
Banned
(05-02-2012, 03:34 PM)
|
#113
Yeah, and Netflix would seem pretty attractive. Wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be Amazon Prime(plus video streaming service) either.
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:34 PM)
|
#114
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:34 PM)
|
#115
Value of this deal is completely dependent on what you get above and beyond the basic gold xbox live service. There are so many optional services relating to media that might or might not be included in this package. It's just idiotic to start making judgments on whether this constitutes a 'good deal' until you have that information.
Discussion on whether this sort of model in general is a good idea is valid and interesting though. I would go for it if I could tailor it specifically to the services I want/ need, just as I'm not going to tie myself into a phone contract with 3000 texts per month if I don't text. Similarly, if I am tied for two years, I expect it to work out CHEAPER than if I had paid each month for the same services. It's a payoff for the risk I take in not being able to cancel the service whenever I want, unlike a monthly rolling contract or whatever. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:36 PM)
|
#119
Pretty interesting idea, it would be cool if they offered it for even lower ($50?) or even free.
On second thought, no this is a bad idea. I don't want MS getting any funny ideas for next gen. Next thing you know we'll see consoles retailing for $700 with no contract.
Last edited by neptunes; 05-02-2012 at 03:41 PM.
|
|
The Amiga Brotherhood
(05-02-2012, 03:37 PM)
|
#120
A monthly charge and low entry cost is basically throwing down the gauntlet for services in the same way 360 threw down the gauntlet for getting the most powerful box in your living room before Sony. The next battle is for the services, not the games. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:38 PM)
|
#123
For me to enter a 2 year contract like this, I would have to save a lot more than $200 up front. I'm not happy that I deal with this model when it comes to cellphones but, ultimately, I know I will need a cellphone plan for the foreseeable future and off contract phone prices are craziness.
I'm sure the math works out for some people, though.
Last edited by Felix Lighter; 05-02-2012 at 03:56 PM.
Reason: Updated up front savings value
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:38 PM)
|
#124
|
|
Corporate Ballwasher
Ignore everything I say (05-02-2012, 03:39 PM)
|
#125
|
|
Welcome to the Wasteland.
I hope you're wearing your flak vest! (05-02-2012, 03:39 PM)
|
#129
Right, that's my understanding, too. So, it's good for people want a system now or sooner, anyway, with Gold and extra stuff included. It's intended for anyone who cannot afford to simply buy the better deal if they see it since they're close enough to 'paycheck to paycheck' status or just want the simplicity of an all-in-one packaging that they're accustomed to choosing from with cable, satellite, and ISPs contracts. It's meant to be the lowest possible barrier, but it's unlikely to be for anyone on GAF or who can simply afford the best deal they can find because they are willing to pay for the whole thing upfront.
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:39 PM)
|
#130
Oh god no
Please don't let this mobile phone business model stick for next gen Also, this thread has made me realize all over again how much I hate paying my cell phone bill every month. I think I had come to a point of acceptance but then when I realize how much I play Xbox opposed to use my phone, it feels wrong again |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:40 PM)
|
#131
See that's what I think some are not seeing here. This works like this. Console Monthly Xbox live fee of 15 bucks a month. Now compare live now to that price. 60 dollars a year. Divide that by 12. That comes out to 5 bucks a month. With this method you'll be paying 15 bucks a month for live or 180 dollars for that year of live. Hence Microsoft will be more then making the cost of that console back.
Last edited by PsychoRaven; 05-02-2012 at 03:43 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:41 PM)
|
#135
Reminds me of the depressing Mega64 video about the new consoles. I really miss the good old days.
Hopefully people don't support this, but I don't see it happening. That $99 price tag will have people buying now, asking questions later. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:42 PM)
|
#137
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:44 PM)
|
#140
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:44 PM)
|
#142
And either way it's guaranteed this will SEVERELY undercut the initial pricepoint of a comparable PS4 model by $100 or more at launch. (Probably $150-200.) This is effectively Microsoft launching a pre-emptive killshot for the market against Sony's next-gen prospects unless they can transition their audience to this model at this late stage. It will put the screws to Nintendo somewhat as well but the big N is less susceptible to being hurt by this. People will always buy Nintendo hardware to play Nintendo's IPs. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:44 PM)
|
#143
What's to stop any console manufacturer from charging a ridiculous amount on their hardware when they usually sell them at a loss during that period. This would fix that. I can see Sony adopting this strategy too.
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:45 PM)
|
#144
Who is even running Microsoft's gaming division these days? A bunch of guys in suits? Thank god for Nintendo. |
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:46 PM)
|
#145
Yes, PTL for Nintendo's amazing free online service and their awesome DD catalog.
Last edited by Sho_Nuff82; 05-02-2012 at 03:49 PM.
|
|
Banned
(05-02-2012, 03:46 PM)
|
#146
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:46 PM)
|
#147
|
|
Member
(05-02-2012, 03:46 PM)
|
#149
|