|
Scored 3/100 on an Exam
(05-10-2012, 08:02 PM)
|
#201
|
|
|
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-10-2012, 08:14 PM)
|
#203
I think another component is that some of the "do not compliment" features are things which are not commonly looked at, like elbows. If someone complimented my elbows, I would think they either have a very bizarre fetish, or have been looking at me for such an extended period of time that they've taken time to notice my elbows as well, or some combination of the two. Both explanations are unsettling. And of course, the sexuality of the feature is important too, but some things which can absolutely be very sexual to some people, such as a smile/lips, can be complimented. Interestingly, I just noticed that I would be perfectly fine complimenting a woman's smile, but if I said she had a nice mouth, that would be very creepy and unacceptable. While some of these taboos have obvious, rational explanations -- as Stet said, complimenting a woman's breasts comes across as an overtly sexual advance -- others do not and just seem customary.
Last edited by Opiate; 05-10-2012 at 08:17 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:23 PM)
|
#204
I think a large part of it is (perceived) intent. Why are you complimenting at all? What motive could you possibly have to comment on any part of me? Especially when you're a stranger.
And then it gets offensive because you can't help but think the person is just thinking sexual thoughts. I guess some people are okay with it if you're in a flirty environment, but it's not okay when you're just standing at a station. It feels like that person is making assumptions about you. If someone approaches you and compliments you on stuff like that, they must think you're okay with it. So that tells me that they think I'm the type of person who flaunts my sexuality and wants to attract a certain group of people. But no. I'm just standing around waiting for a train or something. And it offends me that you would think that I'm the kind of person who wants random men to take notice.
Last edited by frequency; 05-10-2012 at 08:25 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:24 PM)
|
#205
I've thought about something actually. You know those dresses that some women wear that leave absolutely nothing to the imagination? Their tits are practically popping out at every instance.
Those dresses are just shouting, "Look at my tits! look at how beautiful they are!". Your eyes of course are naturally going to gravitate to that area. It's kind of like me walking around with cock out. Who isn't going to look? lol The point being, a woman wears that kind of dress to at least spark some kind of reaction, even if it isn't a directly spoken reaction. If a woman makes such effort to bring attention to her breasts, is it necessarily a bad thing to comment on them? |
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-10-2012, 08:27 PM)
|
#206
You have nice breasts: I would like to have sex with you. You have a nice butt: I would also like to have sex with you. You have nice eyes: I think you are pretty, but do not intend to make a sexual advance. You have a nice smile: you seem like a happy, beautiful girl, but I also don't intend to make a sexual advance. You have nice hair/clothes: You have a good sense of style. You have nice elbows: I either have a very bizarre fetish or I've been staring at you for long enough to notice something mundane like your elbows. Obviously these are not always correct assumptions, just that this is how most of those compliments are percieved.
Last edited by Opiate; 05-10-2012 at 08:32 PM.
|
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 08:28 PM)
|
#207
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:30 PM)
|
#208
Sadly it would come across as perverted to say that. Same with a well shaped posterior. A woman might say differently, but I think they know what they're doing when they wear cleavage revealing tops, sweaters that accentuate their chest area, or a tight dress that shows off their figure. There are a couple of women at work, much older than I am, by at least 12 years, that someways wear these tops where their chest (no cleavage, mind you) is sticking out like. I'm friendly with both of them, we've talked about non-work related stuff on multiple occasions. But as someone who wants to keep my job and doesn't want to be know as the creeper from the IT department, eye contact is critical. And I don't even know how to bring up that observation at work. Where could a conversation possibly go that that would ever escape your lips?
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:31 PM)
|
#209
I love my boobs. They're pretty awesome. But if, upon meeting me, that's what you decide to comment upon it seems obvious that you've pretty much reduced me to nothing more than a pair of tits in your mind. Which is offensive. Plus, the creepyness is a huge factor. It comes across as an overt sexual come-on. Coming from someone I barely know it's actually a little bit threatening. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:32 PM)
|
#211
The way I see it, it's not about you wanting random people to take notice, but I can't shake this feeling that it's being put out there purposefully, given an already known fact that (forgive me here) "men like boobs." Again, I emphasize that it's not something that's cool to point out aside from situations understood to be OK by both parties, but...I just don't know. Call me ignorant. |
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 08:32 PM)
|
#212
|
|
always-end-with-a-swirl
(05-10-2012, 08:33 PM)
|
#213
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:33 PM)
|
#214
What do I have to do with it exactly? It is more presenting herself publicly. In that sense I would make the assumption she wants to be seen publicly.
I'm simply asking the question if she wears a dress that is specifically accentuating her breasts, is it necessarily a bad thing to acknowledge them? |
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 08:34 PM)
|
#215
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:36 PM)
|
#216
Don't get smart. The implication was not about attention whoring, it was about understanding that people will see you whatever is being exposed, and the fact that breasts probably carry a more sexual weight than a pair of legs doesn't need to be brought up.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:39 PM)
|
#217
It is also completely hypothetical. It has nothing to do with whether I would or wouldn't comment on her breasts. I am simply playing devils advocate so to speak. |
|
card-carrying scientician
(05-10-2012, 08:41 PM)
|
#219
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:43 PM)
|
#220
Does everything you wear have some ulterior motive? I wear what I wear just because I like it. It's very depressing if I have to stop wearing what I want and stop being comfortable because I need to hide myself otherwise I'm being perceived as wanting attention. I guess my point is that I'm wearing this for me. Not for you. If I can't dress for myself anymore and have to be conscious of hiding any skin, then society has regressed. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:43 PM)
|
#221
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:44 PM)
|
#223
|
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-10-2012, 08:45 PM)
|
#224
You assume that a compliment for your breasts is an overt sexual advance, when it doesn't necessarily have to be so. It is, as you said, the "percieved intent." Similary, a man might assume that the low cut shirt you're wearing is intended to draw attention. That is the percieved intent. However, I think the former assumption is much safer than the latter -- so ultimately I agree with you. I just wanted to make note that this concept goes both ways.
Last edited by Opiate; 05-10-2012 at 08:48 PM.
|
|
I have a foreskin yet I do not have AIDS
(05-10-2012, 08:47 PM)
|
#226
|
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 08:47 PM)
|
#227
|
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-10-2012, 08:48 PM)
|
#229
I have (although obviously not expressed in precisely those words). I agree, it's not typical, but it's seems entirely possible that you're assuming you know the intent of every man when you did not, just as men in here are assuming every tight shirt is intended to draw their attention.
Last edited by Opiate; 05-10-2012 at 08:51 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:50 PM)
|
#230
This is not a deep argument I was making btw.. I was just throwing it out there because it came to mind. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:51 PM)
|
#231
I think the main thing is that women do tend to want to show off "what they've got", which explains cleavage. In many ways men are the same. On the other hand, they want blokes staring and drooling over their assets. Seems pretty logical when you think about it.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:52 PM)
|
#232
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:53 PM)
|
#233
But it's crossing the line when someone approaches you and acts upon their assumptions. |
|
Depressingly Realistic
(05-10-2012, 08:54 PM)
|
#234
Originally Posted by frequency:
Last edited by Opiate; 05-10-2012 at 08:56 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:55 PM)
|
#236
I think our attraction to the opposite sex does cloud our judgement and makes are motives seem unclear sometimes but what about those times where even women judge each other on what they're wearing? Are they just as guilty for assuming? |
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 08:57 PM)
|
#238
Judging in what way? Assuming the women want attention? They're just as guilty of course. Who the fuck are they to decide why I'm wearing X.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:58 PM)
|
#239
I...see.... Nice smile is totally different. You can always see a full smile. You pretty much only see full breasts in sexual scenarios. |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 08:59 PM)
|
#240
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 09:00 PM)
|
#242
|
|
underwear police
(05-10-2012, 09:01 PM)
|
#243
I'd like to add that opiate's post doesn't do anything to negate the idea that they're objectifying a woman still based on certain parts. Fly by comments are still rude.
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 09:01 PM)
|
#244
Out of interest, I just remembered an interview that is very on topic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbTm6hdLm2M |
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 09:06 PM)
|
#246
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 09:08 PM)
|
#248
|
|
Member
(05-10-2012, 09:08 PM)
|
#249
Yep, assuming they want attention. Ok thank you, I just wanted to clarify that it could work both ways, because some women are looking just as hard at that nicely fit top with matching heels as unfairly as some guys do. Like you said, they don't know why you could be wearing what you're wearing.
|
|
If I want to pay a black man $20 to suck him off in a public bathroom, by God and Country, I SHALL.
(05-10-2012, 09:09 PM)
|
#250
|