|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 08:16 AM)
|
#901
Stupid alarmist bullshit |
|
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 01:35 PM)
|
#902
I think it's better to think about it as donating to something that might get you some free bonus stuff. Same when I see people complaining about some of the higher pledge rewards of kickstarter not being worth it. The point is to support a project, the rewards are just small incentives to get more people to donate.
|
|
(05-14-2012, 02:13 PM)
|
#905
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 02:14 PM)
|
#908
How does that make you feel? Do you feel like you deserve to make threads still? If you could make a new thread, what would you discuss? How are you going to spend all of your additional free time? |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 02:15 PM)
|
#909
|
|
(05-14-2012, 02:18 PM)
|
#910
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 02:35 PM)
|
#911
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 02:37 PM)
|
#912
I say this guy get's butter_sticks thread making ability, Highlander style.
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 02:42 PM)
|
#913
Nice job. You have impressed the regulars and made a name for yourself.
|
|
show 'em yer Jazz hands
(05-14-2012, 03:05 PM)
|
#914
I'm late to the discussion, but I want to put in my thoughts.
I was a backer on Republique, but the by the end of the Kickstarter campaign I was totally tired of hearing about it and disgusted by how heavy handed all of Ryan's friends were about pimping the thing out on podcasts, in articles, and through social media. You couldn't go a day without a major outlet reminding you of the project, and it felt really, really gross. This was written before it funded, when it looked like it was going to come up short: http://stupidgamer.com/2012/05/08/re...d-to-pitch-in/ And yes, this was a project that the gaming industry decided that we needed to fund. It was almost like supporting the project was equated with supporting Shacknews, IGN, Joystiq, Kotaku, etc. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 04:31 PM)
|
#915
You essentially use Kickstarter to gain pre-orders for a soon to launch game. The 7% commission is usually much cheaper than traditional outlets and you can have the more expensive tiers which are essentially free money for the devs/publishers that otherwise wouldn't be available by any other method. Just set the funding amount low enough that you're guaranteed to hit it and you're golden. Much like they did with Xenonauts. And it can be replicated for pretty much any other release. It's way better than doing collector editions and going forward not doing it is just leaving money on the table. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 04:38 PM)
|
#916
My goodness. Seems like a waste to me. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 04:40 PM)
|
#918
The documentary is awesome, and note that the original $100k was *bare bones* coverage. Three times 'bare bones' seems reasonable for the amount of revenue they eventually got.
|
|
beaten too hard
or not enough <3 (05-14-2012, 04:54 PM)
|
#919
|
|
STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
(05-14-2012, 05:03 PM)
|
#920
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 05:05 PM)
|
#921
I think its a little ridiculous that the documentary is going to cost more than the original budget of the Game. Increased costs went to - Increased travel time because of 1 yr dev time instead of 6 months - Buying new equipment. - Buying music. So from 100,000 to $393,964 (which is actually 4 times the cost) Why cant they use their existing equipment Which looks great from all the vids I've seen. Why cant they not get super expensive music? Do you really need a brand new score for a video game documentary? 6 months extra of people sitting behind desks doing work? I would prefer they put that money into the game. Budget seems excessive to me. Throwing the money around a bit if you ask me. It would be terrible if they don't meet budget and time constraints... |
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 05:11 PM)
|
#922
The docu is a massive positive and they are doing right it making it as good as they can. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 05:20 PM)
|
#926
did you put into the Kickstarter before or after they went over the initial target? they were very upfront that whatever money went in over the original target would be split between the game and the documentary.
the documentary has been great so far and it was always part of the intitial funding target and always part of the plan for any overage. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 05:22 PM)
|
#927
Allow me to kinda/sorta fix that for you.
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 08:45 PM)
|
#928
All i was saying is that... 2PP's productions were also good before they got their budget upped 400%. I didn't think it was so necessary, what with the new equipment and brand new music. I was just surprised that that budget grew by so much. |
|
Billiechu
(05-14-2012, 10:12 PM)
|
#930
Uhhh... why? They were given 3 million to make the game. Why would they not use that 3 million? Why would they commit what's basically fraud when even copy they sell is pure profit?
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 10:18 PM)
|
#932
People pledged money for DFA and for DFA only. |
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 10:19 PM)
|
#933
Besides the money for the documentary, and overhead costs, Double Fine has explicitly stated that they're putting the rest of the money into that one project.
If word ever got out that Double Fine spent the money on something else, the community would be in an uproar. It's really not in Double Fine's best interest to risk something like that, and they know it. |
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 10:22 PM)
|
#934
|
|
watch me play my flute
(05-14-2012, 10:25 PM)
|
#937
Poor scarves. They get so much hate. All they wanna do is keep your neck warm and, in certain cases, keep sand out.
I don't see why people get their panties in such a twist over Kickstarter. People pay money for stupid stuff all the damn time. So, you think people giving money to Kickstarter projects that may never actually produce something is stupid. Cool. That's their problem. They have every right to spend their money on whatever the hell they want. Personally, I like Kickstarter. But you obviously have to use your brain and look at the people behind the projects their past work if any and using the information available to decide whether or not they seem trustworthy.
Last edited by El Sloth; 05-14-2012 at 10:34 PM.
|
|
I'm an idiot
(05-14-2012, 10:30 PM)
|
#938
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 10:39 PM)
|
#939
The original $$$ value for DFA is 400k, they got 3 million. Tim would be stupid to A) throw that all into a game. B) not put it in a bank n collect some interest. They don't need it right away. I didn't assert that what my said was fact (what with the pulling it outta my Ass caveat). Settle down fool |
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 10:58 PM)
|
#945
Here is a quote from Kickstarter's Project Guidelines, which despite being called "guidelines" are rules hard enough that projects which violate them will not be allowed to launch.
Quote:
I find that most Kickstarter detractors have never bothered to give the site's terms of service or guidelines even a cursory look and am not surprised that you prove yourself no exception. |
|
Billiechu
(05-16-2012, 01:17 AM)
|
#947
|
|
Banned
(05-16-2012, 01:29 AM)
|
#948
I think what brings out the detractors is a basic reversal of what capitalism is supposed to be about. The basic premise of commerce is the idea of exchanging money for goods. However commerce is not really what Kickstarter is aimed at achieving (although it certainly plays a large part).
Kickstarter is inherently a mechanism for individuals to fund projects that may otherwise not have been funded. That's all there is to it. The rewards are just meant to sweeten the incentive to give money, but overall, they're not the point. The point is to help teams and individuals create artistic goods that would not otherwise exist. Well this makes people suspicious. They've spent their entire lives dealing with the legacy version of commerce that such a new way of doing business goes against everything they've ever known. You don't Kickstart a project to BUY a project. You kickstart it to HELP a project come to fruition. Now others may certainly see it in other ways but that's my perspective on it and that's why some people have a hard time coming to terms with it. It's inherently socialized game development. And anything socialized is a scam. Just because one guy might be a scam artist and make off with your good will - it doesn't mean everyone will. And just because one person managed to take advantage of the system - so what? The overall good is worth it. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of legitimate individuals who will make what you want them to make if enough people are like-minded and want to see it happen. If you can't bring yourself to trust these individuals, that's fair. But I think it's important to understand why people do reach out and give millions to DFA or 500k to Republique.
Last edited by zendavis; 05-16-2012 at 01:35 AM.
|
|
It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
(05-16-2012, 02:51 PM)
|
#950
|