|
Member
(05-13-2012, 11:04 PM)
|
#51
|
|
|
|
Member
(05-13-2012, 11:09 PM)
|
#52
not too ridiculous, games the first year of the 360 don't look near as good as the games today. It takes devs awhile to fully use everything the system has. That and the public wouldn't be down with buying a new system ever few years.
|
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 12:12 AM)
|
#53
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 12:37 AM)
|
#54
If you want to keep playing your ancient hardware year six after its release, nobody will stop you. But for many people that want new hardware, better hardware that offers more potential for developers to get the most out of, 10 years is about five years too long. |
|
Member
(05-14-2012, 05:39 AM)
|
#55
The PS1 had a lifespan of 10 years, the PS2 is at eleven, the PSP is at 7, the Game Boy ran for 14 years, the DS is at 8, the NES was available for a whopping 20 years (10 in the US). There is a market for a bit underpowered consoles at cheap prices.
|
|
Banned
(05-14-2012, 05:59 AM)
|
#56
Yea, lifespan is different than time between new consoles. Let the PS3 last 25 years as long ad there are a PS4, PS5, PS6, and PS7 in thattime.
|