|
(05-22-2012, 05:16 PM)
|
#104
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:17 PM)
|
#106
Anyway we saw what Marvel has done with many of its characters, they took Nick Fury who nobody cared about, and made him interesting in part by his ethnicity change (in the Ultimate universe and cinematic universe). I suspect they will take a character who needs much the same "makeover" in this instance as well. Why does everyone keep suspecting it will be a villain? Personally I don't think that is their route, it has the potential to send a bad message. Wouldn't bother me, but still. |
|
G for Gothic Lolita
(05-22-2012, 05:18 PM)
|
#107
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:19 PM)
|
#109
|
|
Hemp Hemp Hooray
(05-22-2012, 05:21 PM)
|
#111
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:21 PM)
|
#112
Luthor has been in the relaunch since day 1 so that leaves him out too. |
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:23 PM)
|
#113
Big deal. Ultimate Marvel did this with Colossus years ago.
AND IT WAS DUMB. Not because they handled Colossus being gay poorly (as I don't remember that at all) but because they decided to make Nightcrawler, who is usually one of the most kind-hearted X-men, and make him into a hate-filled psycopath for a very special episode. |
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:24 PM)
|
#114
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:26 PM)
|
#115
Good. Minorities need a ton more representation. Companies like DC have a responsibility regarding this. Even if they're probably (definitely) just doing it for media buzz, the end result is good. If it's written well, that is. But mainstream comics, so probably not.
Next they can work on not having a super-objectified depiction of women. Actually, nevermind. That's less likely than Batman and Superman both turning out to be gay.
As for Nightcrawler, he acted like some people actually do when they find out their best mate is guy, just exaggerated for comics. They went too far, maybe, but it wasn't completely stupid. You could understand the artistic reason.
Last edited by Suairyu; 05-22-2012 at 05:28 PM.
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:26 PM)
|
#116
|
|
Hemp Hemp Hooray
(05-22-2012, 05:27 PM)
|
#117
|
|
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
(05-22-2012, 05:28 PM)
|
#118
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:31 PM)
|
#123
It felt very heavy handed. I thought these two things happened within issues of each other. |
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:34 PM)
|
#124
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:37 PM)
|
#128
On one hand, this is fantastic to keep branching away from the homogenization of comic book heroes that had unfortunately built up over the years.
On the other hand, I'm sure there's a more organic way to this that wouldn't feel so forced. On the third hand, it's just comics and people really seem to get upset about these things when the damn things reboot every ten years or so anyway. I'm not surprised to see minorities getting more spotlight in the stories though. And, it is a good thing. It seems strange to have a staunch resistance to this change especially among younger audiences who are, in general, far more progressive than older demographics. I know it's more due to the "change is worrisome" but these overhauls of characters really allows a great breadth and depth of creativity that couldn't be enjoyed if the creators stuck staunchly to their original visions. I mean, look at Batman and the numerous various portrayals we've had of him. It would suck if we were stuck with just the Adam West interpretation for the last fifty years. |
|
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
(05-22-2012, 05:39 PM)
|
#129
|
|
Member
(05-22-2012, 05:45 PM)
|
#132
If it has to be a goddamn gimmick to give me a gay character in comics that I can get into then so be it.
I think a lot of people take for granted how 99% of comics are really focused on straight emotional / sexual relationships. I can get invested in these relationships regardless of the gender of the characters, but there's something that is always missing for me. When I read the new issues of Swamp Thing I can't tell if I don't give a shit about the relationship between the two characters or if it's just poorly written with crappy characterization. Although it may seem trite or shallow it's difficult for me to get into characters when you can't identify with who they are or their motivations. That's not something that is always tied to their sexual orientation, but anything helps. I love comics, movies, video games and animation, but I can count the number of characters I really feel like I can identify with on one hand. Everyone else gets everything. Not that I have any faith in DC pulling this off. |
|
Junior Member
(05-22-2012, 05:55 PM)
|
#136
Probably Shazam, since we haven't officially seen him yet. I can't imagine it'll be Wally West, given his history.
plus, they're saving Wally and the real Booster Gold for when they revert back to the old continuity If its not Shazam, I'm going to go with Beast Boy. I don't think we've seen him yet and he's a relatively major character. Or have we seen the Doom Patrol yet? Could be one of them too. |
|
(05-22-2012, 05:55 PM)
|
#137
|
|
Hemp Hemp Hooray
(05-22-2012, 06:02 PM)
|
#141
|
|
shh! it's already 2014!
(05-22-2012, 06:02 PM)
|
#142
I like how being gay is a big reveal in a comic book.
|