|
Member
(05-28-2012, 05:27 AM)
|
#352
Oh, that's what the article meant by "linewide relaunch"? I guess that does away with my objections.
|
|
gimme some o dat God-crafted alabaster greatness
(05-28-2012, 05:31 AM)
|
#353
That is from Earth X, great book. |
|
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
(05-28-2012, 05:42 AM)
|
#354
Like I've said before, it seems to me that shazam seems like the only real option. He's a character that's had no sexual interaction in the past due to being an avatar placed on a child. Since he is an adult now, they can do with him whatever they want.
Last edited by Parallax; 05-28-2012 at 05:45 AM.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 06:16 AM)
|
#355
not a teenager?? diana now is your chance! |
|
the things I do for money
I'll never understand the world is just a marble in the palm of my hand (05-28-2012, 06:51 AM)
|
#359
I thought they were supposed to be doing that "Captain Marvel isn't one kid but a whole bunch of them merged together like Captain Planet" thing they had going on in Flashpoint? Of course, I know next to nothing about New 52 Shazam so that's probably wrong.
|
|
Member
(05-28-2012, 08:33 AM)
|
#362
|
|
am I an eager baby bird?
am I a cute baby bunny? (05-28-2012, 09:43 AM)
|
#364
Iconic is the only clue. Wait..they better not make Icon gay. Nah, DC would never refer to him as iconic, anyway...
So that's the clue, it's someone who's been around a while. Probably been on either the JSA or the JLA, someone who hasn't been mothballed into obscurity. They haven't brought Ray Palmer back yet have they? Starman was bi at some point if I recall correctly... |
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(05-28-2012, 07:09 PM)
|
#366
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(05-28-2012, 07:14 PM)
|
#369
|
|
(05-28-2012, 07:19 PM)
|
#370
I love that last panel where everyone is like "good joke, man!" and not disturbed as fuck at the extremely awkward father-son power struggle.
Last edited by HP_Wuvcraft; 05-28-2012 at 07:21 PM.
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(05-28-2012, 07:34 PM)
|
#371
|
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 08:50 AM)
|
#372
|
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 08:59 AM)
|
#373
all that talk of diversity yet their asian Batgirl has completely disappeared and we have Hal in the JL(though im a Hal fan)
Last edited by Razgriz-Specter; 06-01-2012 at 09:13 AM.
|
|
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
(06-01-2012, 09:18 AM)
|
#374
Id like to think that the minority thing is part johns, part blind fanboy hate. I mean jason rusch was hated before he could do anything. |
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 09:25 AM)
|
#376
Ehh don't like.
Him being gay is kinda weird, and probably the most random character to make gay, but I can deal with that pretty easy. Him being a young man sucks though. I like my Alan Scott as a grumpy old grampa with two creepy adult children. He was an awesome team dad for JSA. |
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 09:27 AM)
|
#377
and similar to how I felt about Huntress. |
|
am I an eager baby bird?
am I a cute baby bunny? (06-01-2012, 09:49 AM)
|
#378
Quote:
When you come to a deadend with a character. You don't just give him to some new guy and reboot. They ran out of ideas for him after breaking his neck, and blah. It's just annoying. But that's DC lately. |
|
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
(06-01-2012, 09:52 AM)
|
#379
I like new teen characters. But I fucking hate stephanie brown. |
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(06-01-2012, 10:17 AM)
|
#380
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(06-01-2012, 10:25 AM)
|
#383
Wow, she was one of the best written characters in comics, female or otherwise, in the last few years. Go figure.
|
|
am I an eager baby bird?
am I a cute baby bunny? (06-01-2012, 10:38 AM)
|
#385
I dunno about that. She was written, sure. Since most female characters tend to be background or part of an ensemble, that's definitely a difference. But saying she was one of the best written, I just dunno. She went from Tim's plucky girlfriend, to the heir to the Batgirl mantle, with every growing pains story line they could think up, facing her off against jobber type enemies, that whole weird thing with the older detective, and a very cliched 'dealing with your past and accepting who you are' theme. It's like it took them as many years to learn HOW to write Stephanie Brown as it did for her to finally become a believable Batgirl. And just when they finally got there they ended her book for Final Crisis, Darkest Night, and New 52 Reboot.
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(06-01-2012, 11:56 AM)
|
#387
I pretty much only read her Batgirl series, as well as her excellent appearances in the Cass Batgirl series. All of that was brilliant.
I cannot fathom not loving Brian Q Miller's run. That run made me go back and buy the entire Cass run. So I owe her doubly, because I worship Cass now.
Last edited by krypt0nian; 06-01-2012 at 11:59 AM.
|
|
(06-01-2012, 01:29 PM)
|
#389
I liked Cass as spoiler better.
|
|
Samus made me a Widower :(
(06-01-2012, 01:52 PM)
|
#392
Not in the literal sense of non-comic-reader awareness, no. But he's as "major" and "iconic" as one could have hoped for the character to be, considering that DC realistically wasn't going to introduce a gay version of a character who could be licensed individually (Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Hal Jordan, Barry Allen) or for whom a sexuality change would generate too much fan backlash and/or require too many changes to what little pre-New 52 continuity has been retained (Tim Drake, Superboy, Kyle Rayner).
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(06-01-2012, 02:55 PM)
|
#394
Considering who the initial comment was made to (comic buyers at a comic convention), he'll yes Alan Scott is iconic. He's one of a handful of original superheroes from which all others have been modeled after.
But I already see some of the gay blogs complaining that it's not enough. Typical really. Don't celebrate, pick it apart. It's not like DC has been supporting LGBT charas for years and years now. |
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 02:59 PM)
|
#395
....i'm fooling myself, right ? |
|
Member
(06-01-2012, 03:52 PM)
|
#397
Probably. As far as 90% of people are concerned gender and sex are synonyms. On the other hand, companies love attention whoring, so if they thought they could exploit it, then maybe...
|
|
Honourary member of the SISTERHOOD
(06-01-2012, 04:26 PM)
|
#399
|