|
Member
(06-02-2012, 06:56 PM)
|
#154
(And it's not at all fair to credit them for just "tech work" on GR:SW, Julian Gollop actually works out of that office, he's one of its earliest employees and has worked there since 2006.) So after a bunch of yeoman work, Ubisoft is handing them something significant... I don't know if we can say whether they can handle it or not. I'm more concerned at this point who the producer and storywriter is and what the budget/development time is, my fears are more on the Ubisoft production end than the developer. |
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 06:59 PM)
|
#158
Were you not always playing as assassins in the other AC games ? (I've only played 1 and 2) |
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:00 PM)
|
#160
Here's a link to the ign article with the picture of the protagonist.
http://m.ign.com/articles/2012/06/02...-vita-revealed |
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:04 PM)
|
#165
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:06 PM)
|
#168
I agree. I remember a few years ago, when Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines was released simultaneously with Assassin's Creed II. Even though I had originally preordered both games with the intention of getting them at the same time, I opted to pick up only AC2 at release, and grabbed Bloodlines a few weeks later.
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:06 PM)
|
#171
i think they want to not use a templar as a main character as not to "deceive" the people into them being the good guys but more of supplying a gray area through the eyes of this assassin.
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:08 PM)
|
#172
I trust GAF 10x more than IGN. |
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:09 PM)
|
#173
On one hand, I'm kinda happy I probably don't have to buy a Vita for this since it's Ubisoft Sofia and they don't really instill confidence in this product.
On the other hand I'm sick and tired of publishers spreading out franchises over thousands of different platforms and formats. |
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:09 PM)
|
#174
Anyway, if they manage to pull this off even to AC1 or Revelations mediocre standards and price it appropriately (aka, not the same price as the full game), I'll probably pick it up. I've no clue why they'd tailor multiplayer specifically for the Vita though, surely AC3 and Liberation's multiplayer would cannibalise each other? Ideally they'd figure out a way to get AC3's multi in there and have cross platform play. |
|
Super Adventure Boxing
(06-02-2012, 07:10 PM)
|
#178
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:11 PM)
|
#179
|
|
JJ's Glory Hole!
(06-02-2012, 07:12 PM)
|
#180
|
|
XP-39C²
(06-02-2012, 07:13 PM)
|
#183
I've been wondering what goes under "port begging", can a moderator explain? I thought it was more in the line about talking like "this game would be so much better if it was on (insert system name here) instead", not just saying that one wish the game was on another platform.
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:14 PM)
|
#186
|
|
(06-02-2012, 07:14 PM)
|
#187
it looks hot
|
|
Member
(06-02-2012, 07:19 PM)
|
#199
I really wanted a female protagonist in an AC game (just seemed like a series that could really do it well) so I would be all over this game if I had a Vita, was considering a Vita, or was not already dropping $60 (plus whatever a Wii U costs) to get ACIII proper. Same-day release as ACIII does not seem like a good decision.
|